Home
Subject List
Alphabetical List
Help
FAQ
Highlights
Deutsche Version
Quick Search
Advanced Search >>
Single Articles
View Shopping Cart
LogIn
Username
Password
Register Now
Thieme eJournals / AbstractContact Us
Original Article
Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1089-1093
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826039

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
 
 
Chromoendoscopy Using Indigo Carmine Dye Spraying with Magnifying Observation Is the Most Reliable Method for Differential Diagnosis between Non-Neoplastic and Neoplastic Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective Study
 
K.-I.  Fu1, 2, Y.  Sano1, S.  Kato1, T.  Fujii1, F.  Nagashima1, T.  Yoshino1, T.  Okuno1, S.  Yoshida1, T.  Fujimori2
1 Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Digestive Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
2 Department of Surgical and Molecular Pathology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Mibu, Shimotuga, Tochigi, Japan

Background and Aims: Differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions is very important at colonoscopy, since removal or biopsy of non-neoplastic polyps wastes time and resources. We therefore conducted a prospective study to examine whether indigo carmine dye spraying with and without magnification is more reliable than the conventional method for differential diagnosis.
Patients and Methods: 122 patients with 206 lesions of 10 mm or smaller were recruited into this study. All lesions detected on colonoscopy were first diagnosed using the conventional view, then at chromoendoscopy using 0.2 % indigo carmine, and finally at chromoendoscopy with magnification. The diagnosis at each step were recorded consecutively. All lesions were finally categorized as neoplastic or non-neoplastic according to pit pattern; non-neoplastic lesions were biopsied for histological evaluation, and all the neoplastic ones were removed endoscopically. The accuracy rate of each type of endoscopic diagnosis was evaluated, using histological findings as reference.
Results: Histologically, 46 lesions (22 %) were non-neoplastic and 160 (78 %) were neoplastic. The overall diagnostic accuracies by conventional view, chromoendoscopy, and chromoendoscopy with magnification were 84.0 % (173/206), 89.3 % (184/206) and 95.6 % (197/206), respectively.
Conclusion: Chromoendoscopy with magnification is the most reliable method for determining whether a colorectal lesion is non-neoplastic or neoplastic.

 
Full text (English) as
HTML (36 kb)  PDF (303 kb)
Table of Contents
Other Issues:
Service
Sample Issue (01/2009)
Recommend Article
Recommend Journal
Instructions for Authors
More About This Journal
Endoscopy Cases & Techniques Library
German National License
Download Bibliographical Data
Bookmark Article
Connotea    Connotea

Delicious    Delicious



©
Thieme eJournals is a service of the Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. and
Georg Thieme Verlag.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York. All rights reserved.
Impressum / Disclaimer