Home
Subject List
Alphabetical List
Help
FAQ
Highlights
Deutsche Version
Quick Search
Advanced Search >>
Single Articles
View Shopping Cart
LogIn
Username
Password
Register Now
Thieme eJournals / AbstractContact Us
Short Communication
Endoscopy 2005; 37: 362-366
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826156

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
 
 
Puncture of Solid Pancreatic Tumors Guided by Endoscopic Ultrasonography: A Pilot Study Series Comparing Trucut and 19-Gauge and 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles
 
T.  Itoi1, F.  Itokawa1, A.  Sofuni1, K.  Nakamura1, A.  Tsuchida2, K.  Yamao3, T.  Kawai4, F.  Moriyasu1
1 Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
2 Third Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
3 Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
4 Endoscopic Center, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Background and Study Aims: The aim of this prospective study was to compare endoscopic ultrasonography-guided Trucut needle biopsy (EUS-TNB) with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) using 19- and 22-gauge needles for biopsy from different sites in patients with solid pancreatic cancers.
Patients and Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients with masses in the uncinate process (n = 3), the head (n = 5), or the body and tail (n = 8) of the pancreas underwent both EUS-TNB and EUS-FNAB. The specimens obtained were evaluated by histopathological analysis alone
Results: Tissue specimens were obtained by Trucut needle, and by 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles in 69 %, 69 %, and 100 % of patients respectively. Sensitivity for malignancy was 69 % for all needles. Tissue sampling by Trucut and by 19-gauge aspiration needle from masses in the uncinate process was impossible. The sensitivity of the Trucut and 19-gauge aspiration needles was 100 % in the 11 patients with successful procedures. If Trucut or19-gauge aspiration needles had been used for body and tail masses, and the 22-gauge aspiration needle for masses in the uncinate process and head, the sensitivity for malignancy would have been 81 %.
Conclusions: EUS-TNB allows reliable tissue sampling for the diagnosis of pancreatic masses, but its use is limited to lesions in the body and tail of the pancreas. EUS-FNAB using a 22-gauge needle may be useful for accurate diagnosis in some patients with masses in the uncinate process or the head of the pancreas.

 
Full text (English) as
HTML (38 kb)  PDF (363 kb)
Table of Contents
Other Issues:
Service
Sample Issue (01/2009)
Recommend Article
Recommend Journal
Instructions for Authors
More About This Journal
Endoscopy Cases & Techniques Library
German National License
Download Bibliographical Data
Bookmark Article
Delicious    Delicious



©
Thieme eJournals is a service of the Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. and
Georg Thieme Verlag.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York. All rights reserved.
Impressum / Disclaimer