J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75(01): 016-019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327445
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Modified Surgical Approach to Cervical Neurinomas with Intraforaminal Components: Minimal Invasive Facet Joint Sparing “Open-Tunnel” Technique

Péter Banczerowski
1   National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
,
Róbert Veres
1   National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
,
János Vajda
1   National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 October 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background The conventional posterior approaches, which may involve multilevel laminectomies and facetectomies, may lead to spinal deformities, instability, or subluxation. Our objective was to develop a minimally invasive approach suitable for exploring neuromas with an intraforaminal component in the cervical spine, with the aim of preserving mechanically relevant bone structures and the facet joints as much as possible.

Methods The authors used the hemi-semi-laminectomy combined with partial lateral facetectomy “open-tunnel” technique in nine adult patients with neuromas of the cervical spine extending into the foramen.

Results The operating field under the operating microscope was sufficient for tumor removal according to the keyhole concept. The approach did not affect the extent of tumor resection or neurological outcome. Complete removal was achieved in all patients, as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The affected nerve roots included C3 in three cases, C2 and C4 in two, and C5 and C6 in one case. Average follow-up was 12 months, with a range from 8 to 18 months. Histological results were as follows: six schwannomas and three neurofibromas. Computed tomographic scans demonstrated the extension of the keyhole approaches and the moderately affected bony structures and facet joints. Instability was detected in none of the patients on the flexion or extension lateral radiographs during the follow-up period.

Conclusion This modified surgical approach fulfills the requirements of other minimally invasive techniques and lowers the risk of damage to the crucial posterior stabilizers of the spine; furthermore, disintegration of vertebral arches and facet joints is reduced. The approach is suitable for exploring and removing neuromas located in the spinal canal and in the neuroforamen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ozawa H, Kokubun S, Aizawa T, Hoshikawa T, Kawahara C. Spinal dumbbell tumors: an analysis of a series of 118 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 587-593
  • 2 Lot G, George B. Cervical neuromas with extradural components: surgical management in a series of 57 patients. Neurosurgery 1997; 41: 813-820 , discussion 820–822
  • 3 Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, Capuano C, Conti R. Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2004; 61: 34-43 , discussion 44
  • 4 Cherqui A, Kim DH, Kim SH, Park HK, Kline DG. Surgical approaches to paraspinal nerve sheath tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2007; 22: E9
  • 5 Tandon N, Vollmer DG. Cervical laminectomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L, , eds. Atlas of Neurosurgical Techniques: Spine and Peripheral Nerves. New York: Thieme; 2006: 233-238
  • 6 Katsumi Y, Honma T, Nakamura T. Analysis of cervical instability resulting from laminectomies for removal of spinal cord tumor. Spine 1989; 14: 1171-1176
  • 7 Yasuoka S, Peterson HA, MacCarty CS. Incidence of spinal column deformity after multilevel laminectomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 441-445
  • 8 McCormick PC. Surgical management of dumbbell tumors of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 1996; 38: 294-300
  • 9 Kato Y, Kaneko K, Kataoka H, Kojima T, Imajyo Y, Taguchi T. Cervical hemilaminoplasty: technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 296-301
  • 10 Raimondi AJ, Gutierrez FA, Di Rocco C. Laminotomy and total reconstruction of the posterior spinal arch for spinal canal surgery in childhood. J Neurosurg 1976; 45: 555-560
  • 11 Shikata J, Yamamuro T, Shimizu K, Saito T. Combined laminoplasty and posterolateral fusion for spinal canal surgery in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 259s: 92-99
  • 12 Kehrli P, Bergamaschi R, Maitrot D. Open-door laminoplasty in pediatric spinal neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 1996; 12: 551-552
  • 13 Tandon N, Vollmer DG. Cervical laminotomy. In: Fessler RG, Sekhar L, , eds. Atlas of Neurosurgical Techniques: Spine and Peripheral Nerves. New York: Thieme; 2006: 239-249
  • 14 Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Aalders M, Wiedemayer H, Floerke M, Stolke D. Reconstruction of the laminar roof with miniplates for a posterior approach in intraspinal surgery: technical considerations and critical evaluation of follow-up results. Spine 2004; 29: E333-E342
  • 15 Banczerowski P, Veres R, Vajda J. Modified minimally invasive surgical approach to cervical neuromas with intraforaminal components: hemi-semi-laminectomy and supraforaminal burr hole (modified foraminotomy) technique. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52: 56-58
  • 16 Koch-Wiewrodt D, Wagner W, Perneczky A. Unilateral multilevel interlaminar fenestration instead of laminectomy or hemilaminectomy: an alternative surgical approach to intraspinal space-occupying lesions. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 485-492
  • 17 Eggert HR, Scheremet R, Seeger W, Gaitzsch J. Unilateral microsurgical approaches to extramedullary spinal tumours. Operative technique and results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1983; 67: 245-253
  • 18 Yasargil MG, Tranmer BI, Adamson TE, Roth P. Unilateral partial hemilaminectomy for the removal extra- and intramedullary tumors and AVMs. In: Symon L, , ed. Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery. Vol. 18. Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag; 1991: 113-132
  • 19 Chiou SM, Eggert HR, Laborde G, Seeger W. Microsurgical unilateral approaches for spinal tumour surgery: eight years' experience in 256 primary operated patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1989; 100: 127-133
  • 20 Sario-glu AC, Hanci M, Bozkuş H, Kaynar MY, Kafadar A. Unilateral hemilaminectomy for the removal of the spinal space-occupying lesions. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1997; 40: 74-77
  • 21 Banczerowski P, Vajda J, Veres R. [Removal of intraspinal space-occupying lesions through unilateral partial approach, the “hemi-semi laminectomy”]. Ideggyogy Sz 2008; 61: 114-122
  • 22 Banczerowski P, Vajda J, Veres R. Exploration and decompression of the spinal canal using split laminotomy and its modification, the “archbone” technique. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (5, Suppl 2) ONS432-ONS440 , discussion ONS440–ONS441