OP-Journal 2014; 30(2): 76-80
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383260
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sprunggelenksfraktur im Alter – was ist anders?

Ankle Fractures in the Elderly – What is Different?
Sabine Ochman
,
Julia Evers
,
Michael J. Raschke
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 February 2015 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Aufgrund der demografischen Entwicklung ist mit einer deutlichen Zunahme von Sprunggelenksfrakturen beim älteren Patienten zu rechnen. Im Vergleich zum jungen Patienten finden sich Unterschiede hinsichtlich des Traumamechanismus, des Frakturmusters, der Knochenqualität und der Nebenerkrankungen. Auch beim älteren Patienten steht die Wiederherstellung der Funktion an oberster Stelle des therapeutischen Regimes. Die konservative Therapie wird bei stabilen Frakturformen sowie instabilen Frakturen mit Kontraindikationen zur operativen Therapie empfohlen. Die operative Therapie sollte weichteiladaptiert und durch spezielle operative Techniken und Implantate individuell erfolgen. Hierbei hat die initiale Transfixation mittels Fixateur externe einen hohen Stellenwert. Die operativen Techniken reichen von dorsaler Plattenpositionierung über K-Draht-Techniken, Hakenplatten, Fibulanägel bis hin zu winkelstabilen Plattensystemen, die gute postoperative Ergebnisse zeigen. Eine primäre Versteifung mittels retrograder Nagelarthrodese ist nur als Salvage-Verfahren Ausnahmefällen vorbehalten.

Abstract

Because of the demographic changes there will be an increase of osteoporotic ankle fractures in the elderly. Differences to ankle fractues in younger patients are observed regarding the trauma mechanism, bone quality and comoribidities. The goal of operative treatment is reconstruction of the function and exact anatomy of the ankle joint with respect to the soft tissue trauma. Preoperatively CT scan is recommended for diagnosis and preoperative planning. Recommended operative techniques are the use of locking plates, dorsal plate positioning and second stage reconstruction with initial use of external fixation. Primary arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail should be considered as salvage procedure in exceptional cases.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Al-Nammari SS, Dawson-Bowling S, Amin A et al. Fragility fractures of the ankle in the frail elderly patient: treatment with a long calcaneotalotibial nail. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B: 817-822
  • 2 Ali MS, McLaren CA, Rouholamin E et al. Ankle fractures in the elderly: nonoperative or operative treatment. J Orthop Trauma 1987; 1: 275-280
  • 3 Anand N, Klenerman L. Ankle fractures in the elderly: MUA versus ORIF. Injury 1993; 24: 116-120
  • 4 Bauer M, Bengner U, Johnell O et al. Supination-eversion fractures of the ankle joint: changes in incidence over 30 years. Foot Ankle 1987; 8: 26-28
  • 5 Buckingham R, Hepple S, Winson I. Outcome of ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2000; 6: 175-178
  • 6 Bugler KE, Watson CD, Hardie AR et al. The treatment of unstable fractures of the ankle using the Acumed fibular nail: development of a technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94: 1107-1112
  • 7 Cole PA, Craft JA. Treatment of osteoporotic ankle fractures in the elderly: surgical strategies. Orthopedics 2002; 25: 427-430
  • 8 Giannini S, Chiarello E, Persiani V et al. Ankle fractures in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 2013; 25 (Suppl. 01) S77-S79
  • 9 Heim D, Niederhauser K. One-third tubular hook plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 305-309
  • 10 Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al. Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people: Finnish statistics during 1970–2000 and projections for the future. Bone 2002; 31: 430-433
  • 11 Kim T, Ayturk UM, Haskell A et al. Fixation of osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a biomechanical comparison of locking versus conventional plates. J Foot Ankle Surg 2007; 46: 2-6
  • 12 Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W et al. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 635-639
  • 13 Koval KJ, Petraco DM, Kummer FJ et al. A new technique for complex fibula fracture fixation in the elderly: a clinical and biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 28-33
  • 14 Koval KJ, Zhou W, Sparks MJ et al. Complications after ankle fracture in elderly patients. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28: 1249-1255
  • 15 Lemon M, Somayaji HS, Khaleel A et al. Fragility fractures of the ankle: stabilisation with an expandable calcaneotalotibial nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 809-813
  • 16 Lynde MJ, Sautter T, Hamilton GA et al. Complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Surg 2012; 18: 103-107
  • 17 Makwana NK, Bhowal B, Harper WM et al. Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 525-529
  • 18 McKean J, Cuellar DO, Hak D et al. Osteoporotic ankle fractures: an approach to operative management. Orthopedics 2013; 36: 936-940
  • 19 Meier C, Schefold JC, Hug U. Temporary Kirschner wire ankle transfixation and delay ORIF. A staged operative treatment for closed unsatble ankle fractures with tibio-taler dislocations snd soft tissue trauma. Eur J Trauma 2004; 30: 371-377
  • 20 Minihane KP, Lee C, Ahn C et al. Comparison of lateral locking plate and antiglide plate for fixation of distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20: 562-566
  • 21 Ochman S, Raschke MJ. Sprunggelenk und Fuß. Alterstraumatologie 2009; 1: 497-517
  • 22 Pagliaro AJ, Michelson JD, Mizel MS. Results of operative fixation of unstable ankle fractures in geriatric patients. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22: 399-402
  • 23 Panchbhavi VK, Mody MG, Mason WT. Combination of hook plate and tibial pro-fibular screw fixation of osteoporotic fractures: a clinical evaluation of operative strategy. Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26: 510-515
  • 24 Pichl J, Hoffmann R. [Ankle fractures in the elderly]. Unfallchirurg 2011; 114: 681-687
  • 25 Rajeev A, Senevirathna S, Radha S et al. Functional outcomes after fibula locking nail for fragility fractures of the ankle. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2011; 50: 547-550
  • 26 Ramasamy PR, Sherry P. The role of a fibular nail in the management of Weber type B ankle fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone–a preliminary report. Injury 2001; 32: 477-485
  • 27 Rammelt S, Heim D, Hofbauer LC et al. [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures]. Unfallchirurg 2011; 114: 847-860
  • 28 Salai M, Dudkiewicz I, Novikov I et al. The epidemic of ankle fractures in the elderly–is surgical treatment warranted?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 511-513
  • 29 Schaffer JJ, Manoli A 2nd. The antiglide plate for distal fibular fixation. A biomechanical comparison with fixation with a lateral plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69: 596-604
  • 30 Shivarathre DG, Chandran P, Platt SR. Operative fixation of unstable ankle fractures in patients aged over 80 years. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32: 599-602
  • 31 Srinivasan CM, Moran CG. Internal fixation of ankle fractures in the very elderly. Injury 2001; 32: 559-563
  • 32 Wronka KS, Salama H, Ramesh B. Management of displaced ankle fractures in elderly patients–is it worth performing osteosynthesis of osteoporotic bone?. Orthop Traumatol Rehabil 2011; 13: 293-298
  • 33 Zaghloul A, Haddad B, Barksfield R et al. Early complications of surgery in operative treatment of ankle fractures in those over 60: a review of 186 cases. Injury 2014; 45: 780-783
  • 34 Zahn RK, Frey S, Jakubietz RG et al. A contoured locking plate for distal fibular fractures in osteoporotic bone: a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury 2012; 43: 718-725
  • 35 Zwipp H, Amlang M. [Treatment of fractures of the ankle in the elderly]. Orthopade 2014; 43: 332-338