Download PDF
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2015; 47(01): 24-31
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398546
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Digitale Volumentomografie (DVT) des knöchernen Handskeletts: Erste Erfahrungen und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten

Application Possibilities and Initial Experience with Digital Volume Tomography in Hand and Wrist Imaging
S. M. Goerke
1   Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
J. Neubauer
2   Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
H. Zajonc
1   Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
J. R. Thiele
1   Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
E. Kotter
2   Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
M. Langer
2   Department für Radiologische Diagnostik und Therapie, Klinik für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
G. B. Stark
1   Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
,
F. M. Lampert
1   Department Chirurgie, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 18 February 2014

akzeptiert 19 December 2014

Publication Date:
23 February 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die digitale Volumentomografie (DVT) stellt eine neue Möglichkeit der Schnittbildgebung in der Handchirurgie dar. Die Methode hat in der letzten Dekade eine weite Verbreitung in der Kopf-Hals-Bildgebung gefunden und ist in diesem Bereich ein etabliertes Standardverfahren, für das eine, im Vergleich zur Computertomografie (MDCT), niedrigere Strahlenexposition beschrieben wird. Wir berichten über 24 Monate klinische Erfahrung mit dem Einsatz der Methode in einer handchirurgischen Universitätsklinik. Die DVT wird bezüglich ihrer Technik sowie ihrer klinischen Eignung anhand von exemplarischen Falldarstellungen vorgestellt und evaluiert. Weiterhin werden ihre Vor- und Nachteile diskutiert und in den Kontext der aktuellen Literatur gesetzt.

Abstract

During the last decade, DVT (digital volume tomography) imaging has become a widely used standard technique in head and neck imaging. Lower radiation exposure compared to conventional computed tomography (MDCT) has been described. Recently, DVT has been developed as an extremity scanner and as such represents a new imaging technique for hand surgery. We here describe the first 24 months experience with this new imaging modality in hand and wrist imaging by presenting representative cases and by describing the technical background. Furthermore, the method’s advantages and disadvantages are discussed with reference to the given literature.

Schlüsselwörter

bildgebende Verfahren - Handchirurgie - Handgelenk - Computertomografie - Digitale Volumentomografie

Key words

radiological imaging - hand surgery - wrist - computed tomography - digital volume tomography
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Schädel-Höpfner M, Prommersberger KJ, Eisenschenk A et al. Behandlung von Handwurzelfrakturen. Empfehlungen der Sektion Handchirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Unfallchirurgie. Der Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 741-754 quiz 755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hauret L, Hodez C. A new modality for dentomaxillofacial imaging: cone beam CT. Journal de radiologie 2009; 90: 604-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Carrino JA, Al Muhit A, Zbijewski W et al. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. Radiology 2014; 270: 816-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zbijewski W, De Jean P, Prakash P et al. A dedicated cone-beam CT system for musculoskeletal extremities imaging: design, optimization, and initial performance characterization. Medical physics 2011; 38: 4700-4713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De Cock J, Mermuys K, Goubau J et al. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new low dose, high resolution imaging technique of the wrist, presentation of three cases with technique. Skeletal radiology 2012; 41: 93-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ramdhian-Wihlm R, Le Minor JM, Schmittbuhl M et al. Cone-beam computed tomography arthrography: an innovative modality for the evaluation of wrist ligament and cartilage injuries. Skeletal radiology 2012; 41: 963-969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe M. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. Dento maxillo facial radiology 2004; 33: 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?. Dental clinics of North America 2008; 52: 707-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kalender WA. Der Einsatz von Flachbilddetektoren für die CT-Bildgebung. Der Radiologe 2003; 43: 379-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. European radiology 1998; 8: 1558-1564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H et al. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2012; 114: 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Damet J, Sans-Merce M, Mieville F et al. Comparison of organ doses and image quality between CT and flat panel XperCT scans in wrist and inner ear examinations. Radiation protection dosimetry 2010; 139: 164-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K et al. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology and endodontics 2003; 95: 371-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F et al. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics: official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 2008; 133 640 e641-e645
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Matikka H, Viren T. Radiation dose reduction in cone-beam computed tomography of extremities: evaluation of a novel radiation shield. Journal of radiological protection: official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection 2014; 34: N57-N63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Krimmer H, Schmitt R, Herbert T. Kahnbeinfrakturen-Diagnostik, Klassifikation und Therapie. Der Unfallchirurg 2000; 103: 812-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Faccioli N, Foti G, Barillari M et al. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Skeletal radiology 2010; 39: 1087-1095
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O et al. Digitale Volumentomografie (DVT) und Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT (MSCT): eine objektive Untersuchung von Dosis und Bildqualitat.. RoFo: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 2011; 183: 144-153
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tagliafico A, Rubino M, Autuori A et al. Wrist and hand ultrasound. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology 2007; 11: 95-104
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K et al. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otology & neurotology: official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 2009; 30: 299-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leng S, Zambelli J, Tolakanahalli R et al. Streaking artifacts reduction in four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography. Medical physics 2008; 35: 4649-4659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dento maxillo facial radiology 2011; 40: 265-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Neubauer J, Voigt JM, Lang H et al. Comparing the image quality of a mobile flat-panel computed tomography and a multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study. Investigative radiology 2014; 49: 491-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reichardt B, Sarwar A, Bartling SH et al. Musculoskeletal applications of flat-panel volume CT. Skeletal radiology 2008; 37: 1069-1076
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 2009; 107: 559-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. European journal of radiology 2012; 81: 267-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bolte H, Sattler EM, Jahnke T et al. Low dose MDCT of the wrist – an ex vivo approach. European journal of radiology 2011; 77: 207-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Prakash P, Zbijewski W, Gang GJ et al. Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging. Medical physics 2011; 38: 5612-5629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Guggenberger R, Morsbach F, Alkadhi H et al. C-arm flat-panel CT arthrography of the wrist and elbow: first experiences in human cadavers. Skeletal radiology 2013; 42: 419-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Koskinen SK, Haapamaki VV, Salo J et al. CT arthrography of the wrist using a novel, mobile, dedicated extremity cone-beam CT (CBCT). Skeletal radiology 2013; 42: 649-657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar