Rofo 2015; 187(06): 467-471
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399271
Abdomen
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Optimized 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE Sequences at 1.5T MRCP in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis

MRCP mit optimierter 3D-SPACE-Sequenz: Ein Vergleich mit der konventionellen 3D-TSE-Sequenz bei der Diagnostik der Choledocholithiasis
P. Sudholt
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Marburg, Germany
,
C. Zaehringer
2   Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
,
C. Urigo
3   Radiology, Ars Medica Clinic, Gravesano-Lugano, Switzerland
,
A. Tyndall
2   Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
,
G. Bongartz
2   Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
,
J. Hohmann
2   Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 June 2014

15 January 2015

Publication Date:
15 April 2015 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether or not MRCP using a 3D-SPACE sequence allows for better image quality and a higher level of diagnostic confidence than a conventional 3D-TSE sequence at 1.5 T regarding the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in a routine clinical setting.

Materials and Methods: 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE sequences were performed in 42 consecutive patients with suspected choledocholithiasis undergoing MRCP. Evaluation of image quality and diagnostic confidence was done on the pancreaticobiliary tree which was subdivided into 10 segments. They were scored and statistically evaluated separately for visibility and diagnostic certainty by three radiologists with differing levels of experience on a five-point scale of 1 to 5 and –2 to 2, respectively. Student t-test was performed, and the interobserver agreement was also calculated.

Results: Image quality for each segment was significantly better for the 3D-SPACE sequence compared to the 3D-TSE sequence (4.48 ± 0.94 vs. 3.98 ± 1.20; 5-point scale p < 0.01). Diagnostic confidence for the reporting radiologist was also significantly better for 3D-SPACE than for 3D-TSE (1.68 ± 0.56 vs. 1.46 ± 0.70; 3-point scale; p < 0.01). The interobserver agreement was high in both sequences, 0.62 – 0.83 and 0.64 – 0.82, respectively.

Conclusion: The optimized 3D-SPACE sequence allows for better image quality in 1.5 T MRCP examinations and leads to a higher diagnostic confidence for choledocholithiasis compared to the conventional 3D-TSE sequence.

Key Points:

• 3D-SPACE allows for better image quality in 1.5 T MRCP.

• This leads to a higher diagnostic confidence particularly in the periampullary region.

• 3D-SPACE should be considered to substitute conventional 3D-TSE sequences in clinical routine MRCP.

Citation Format:

• Sudholt P, Zaehringer C, Urigo C et al. Comparison of Optimized 3D-SPACE and 3D-TSE Sequences at 1.5T MRCP in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2015; 187: 467 – 471

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die vorliegende Studie soll zeigen, dass eine MRCP im Rahmen der klinischen Routinediagnostik einer Cholezystolithiasis und/oder einer Choledocholithiasis unter Verwendung einer 3D-SPACE-Sequenz eine bessere Bildqualität und eine höhere diagnostische Konfidenz besitzt als die bislang normalerweise angewendete 3D-TSE-Sequenz.

Material und Methoden: Eine 3D-SPACE- und 3D-TSE-Sequenz wurde bei 42 Patienten durchgeführt, die sich einer MRCP mit Verdacht auf Choledocholithiasis unterzogen. Die Beurteilung der Bildqualität und der diagnostischen Konfidenz der Cholangien und des Ductus pancreaticus erfolgte getrennt nach insgesamt 10 Segmenten der Gangsysteme bezüglich des Vorhandenseins von Konkrementen. Drei Radiologen mit unterschiedlicher Erfahrung in abdomineller Radiologie bewerteten diese Parameter auf einer fünfstelligen Skala von 1 bis 5 respektive –2 bis + 2. Die statistische Auswertung erfolgte mittels Student-t-Test. Zusätzlich wurde auch das Interobserver-Agreement mittels Cohen-κ-Statistik berechnet.

Ergebnisse: Die Bildqualität der 3D-SPACE-Sequenz wurde von den befundenden Radiologen signifikant besser als bei der 3D-TSE-Sequenz bewertet (4,48 ± 0,94 vs. 3,98 ± 1,20; 5-Punkte-Skala; p < 0,01). Auch die diagnostische Konfidenz war bei der 3D-SPACE signifikant besser (1,68 ± 0,56 vs. 1,46 ± 0,70; 3-Punkte-Skala; p < 0,01). Dies traf für jedes der untersuchten Segmente der Gallenwege zu, besonders deutlich in der klinisch wichtigen periampullären Region. Das Interobserver-Agreement war für beide Sequenzen mit 0,62 – 0,83 bzw. 0,64 – 0,82 hoch.

Schlussfolgerung: Die optimierte 3D-SPACE-Sequenz liefert in der klinischen Routine auch bei 1,5 T eine bessere Bildqualität und eine höhere diagnostische Konfidenz im Vergleich zur konventionellen 3D-TSE-Sequenz und sollte entsprechend als Standard eingesetzt werden.

Kernaussagen:

• Die 3D-SPACE-Sequenz bietet im Rahmen der 1,5T-MRCP eine überlegene Bildqualität aufgrund höherer Konturschärfe.

• Dies führt zu einer höheren diagnostischen Sicherheit insbesondere in der wichtigen Papillenregion.

• In der klinischen Routine sollte die 3D-SPACE die konventionelle 3D-TSE-Sequenz ersetzen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF et al. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2002; 55: 17-22
  • 2 Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O et al. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000; 215: 737-745
  • 3 Reinhold C, Guibaud L, Genin G et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison between two-dimensional fast spin-echo and three-dimensional gradient-echo pulse sequences. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 1995; 5: 379-384
  • 4 Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y et al. In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique. Am J Roentgenol American journal of roentgenology 1997; 168: 1449-1454
  • 5 Asbach P, Klessen C, Kroencke TJ et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction. Magnetic resonance imaging 2005; 23: 939-945
  • 6 Haystead CM, Dale BM, Merkle EM. N/2 ghosting artifacts: elimination at 3.0-T MR cholangiography with SPACE pulse sequence. Radiology 2008; 246: 589-595
  • 7 Arizono S, Isoda H, Maetani YS et al. High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR cholangiography using a high-sampling-efficiency technique (SPACE) at 3T: comparison with the conventional constant flip angle sequence in healthy volunteers. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 2008; 28: 685-690
  • 8 Morita S, Ueno E, Masukawa A et al. Comparison of SPACE and 3D TSE MRCP at 1.5T focusing on difference in echo spacing. Magnetic resonance in medical sciences: MRMS: an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2009; 8: 101-105
  • 9 Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Maruyama N et al. Usefulness of the SPACE pulse sequence at 1.5T MR cholangiography: comparison of image quality and image acquisition time with conventional 3D-TSE sequence. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI 2013; 38: 1014-1019
  • 10 Griffin N, Charles-Edwards G, Grant LA. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights into imaging 2012; 3: 11-21
  • 11 Irie H, Honda H, Kuroiwa T et al. Pitfalls in MR cholangiopancreatographic interpretation. Radiographics: a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2001; 21: 23-37