Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1988; 01(02): 64-67
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633166
Short Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Pyrolytic Carbon and Cobalt-Chromium Bone Liners Flexible Implant Arthropinlasty

J. A. McGehee
*   From the Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
,
A. R. Swanson
**   From the BIodgett Memorial Medical Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan
,
T. D. Braden
*   From the Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

An in vivo evaluation was conducted on the ability of synthetic bone liners to protect the Swanson High Performance Silastic Finger Joints following 73 flexible arthroplasties in the rabbit stifle. Three different groups of synthetic bone liners were tested against a control group in which no bone liners were used. The implanted bone liners consisted of 48 full circumference liners fabricated from pyrolytic carbon, 34 full circumference and 32 partial circumference liners of a cobaltchromium alloy (Vitallium).

 
  • References

  • 1 Swanson A B, deGroot Swanson G, Frisch E E. Flexible (silicone) implant arthroplasty in small joints of the extremities: Concepts, physical and biological considerations, experimental and clinical results. In: Rubin L R. (ed). Biomaterials in reconstructive surgery. St. Louis: C B Mosby Co; 1983: 595-623.
  • 2 Swanson A B. Flexible implant resection arthroplasty in the hand an extremities. St. Louis: C B Mosby Co; 1973
  • 3 Wrightman B, Simon S, Rose R. et al. Environmental fatigue testing of silastic finger joint prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1972; 3: 15-24.
  • 4 McGehee J A, Swanson A B, Braden T D. An animal model for the implantation of a bone liner in the flexible implant arthroplasty. Vet Comp Ortho Trauma 1988; 1: 40-5.
  • 5 Dixon W J, Massey F J. Enumeration statistics. In: Introduction to statistical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1969. Chap 13: 327-43.
  • 6 Dahhan P, Benazet J P, Leanori J. Carbon fiber ligament prosthesis: present problems and future prospects. Int J Artif Organs 1982; 5 (03) 1985.
  • 7 Benson J. Elemental carbon as a biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res Symp 1971; 5: 41.
  • 8 Claes L, Burri C, Neugebauer R, Walter D, Rose P. The elasticity of various carbon fiber ligament prosthesis. J Biomechanics 1980; 13 (09) 810.
  • 9 Claes L, Neugebauer R. In vivo and in vitro investigation of the long-term behavior and fatigue strength of carbon fiber ligament replacement. Clin Orthop 1985; 196: 99-111.
  • 10 Swanson A B. Flexible implant arthroplasty in the hand. Clin Plast Surg 1976; 3 (01) 141-57.
  • 11 Lynch C T. Handbook of Materials Science. Cleveland: CRC Press; 1975. 3 493.
  • 12 Tonino A J, Davison C L, Klopper R J, Linclau L A. Protection from stress in bone and its effects. J Bone Joint Surg (BR) 1976; 58-B: 107-13.
  • 13 Lynch C T. Handbook of Material Sciences. Cleveland: CRC Press; 1975. 1 431.
  • 14 Cohen J. Biomaterials in orthopaedic surgery. Am J Surg 1967; 114: 31-41.