Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60(02): 151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726740
WIS-Vortrag
Medizinische Physik

Automated objective optimization of iterative image reconstruction protocols

P Nikulin
1   Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Dresden
,
J Maus
1   Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Dresden
,
F Hofheinz
1   Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Dresden
,
J van den Hoff
1   Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department of Positron Emission Tomography, Dresden
› Author Affiliations
 

Ziel/Aim The image quality achieved in iterative PET image reconstruction is influenced by several internal and user-settable parameters (number of iterations and subsets, PSF model, etc.). Typically, there are more than 3 user-settable parameters involved, interacting in a non-intuitive way. Reasonable settings typically are obtained interactively by try-and-error which is highly subjective. This proof-of-concept work proposes a method for automated reconstruction parameters optimization for a given, preselected image quality metric.

Methodik/Methods In out approach, we reconstruct images of cylindrical phantom with six “hot” sphere inserts simulating lesions of different sizes and target-to-background activity concentration ratios (20:1, 10:1, 5:1). 4 parameters of our in-house reconstruction tool THOR [1] were varied during optimization: no. of iterations and subsets, tube of response (ToR) radius, Gaussian post filter FWHM. As image quality metric we chose the weighted sum of standard deviation of contrast recovery coefficients of all 6 inserts (as a surrogate for image resolution), the image noise, and Gibbs artifacts. This metric is minimized with Bayesian optimization method using Gaussian process as a surrogate function. The reconstruction parameters resulting in the minimum metric value were chosen.

Ergebnisse/Results The optimization process lasted for 50 iterations. The resulting reconstruction parameters were: no. of iterations/subsets = 2/21, ToR radius = 2.95mm, Gaussian filter FWHM = 4.0mm. The resulting images show [4.7-5.8]mm resolution and 14 % noise level. Gibbs artifacts level was found to be below 3.5 %.

Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions Our framework for reconstruction protocol optimization is capable of deriving reasonable reconstruction parameters in a fully automated manner. The presented approach might also be used to improve and objectify the comparison of different image reconstruction algorithms.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur/References

  • 1 Lougovski A. , et al., Physics in Medicine and Biology, 59 (03) ), p. 561 2014;