PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · TH Open 2023; 07(03): e206-e216
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770783
Original Article

Rivaroxaban versus Apixaban for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Patients at Lower Risk of Bleeding

Kimberly Snow Caroti
1   Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
2   Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States
,
Cecilia Becattini
3   Department of Internal and Emergency Medicine – Stroke Unit, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
,
Marc Carrier
4   Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
,
Alexander T. Cohen
5   Department of Haematological Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
,
Anders Ekbom
6   Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Alok A. Khorana
7   Cleveland Clinic and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
,
Agnes Y.Y. Lee
8   Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia and BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
,
Christopher Brescia
9   Freshtech IT, LLC, East Hartford, Connecticut, United States
,
Khaled Abdelgawwad
10   Pharmacoepidemiology Group, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
,
George Psaroudakis
10   Pharmacoepidemiology Group, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
,
Marcela Rivera   a
10   Pharmacoepidemiology Group, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
,
Bernhard Schaefer   b
10   Pharmacoepidemiology Group, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
,
Gunnar Brobert   b
10   Pharmacoepidemiology Group, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
,
Craig I. Coleman 
1   Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States
2   Evidence-Based Practice Center, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints


Abstract

This retrospective study, utilizing U.S. electronic health record (EHR) data from January 2013 to December 2020, sought to assess whether rivaroxaban and apixaban had similar effectiveness and safety in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with a cancer type not associated with a high risk of bleeding. We included adults diagnosed with active cancer, excluding esophageal, gastric, unresected colorectal, bladder, noncerebral central nervous system cancers and leukemia, who experienced VTE and received a therapeutic VTE dose of rivaroxaban or apixaban on day 7 post-VTE, and were active in the EHR ≥12 months prior to the VTE. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included recurrent VTE, any bleed resulting in hospitalization, any critical organ bleed, and composites of these outcomes at 3 and 6 months. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 1,344 apixaban and 1,093 rivaroxaban patients. At 3 months, rivaroxaban was found to have similar hazard to apixaban for developing recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.60–1.27). No differences were observed between cohorts for this outcome at 6 months (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.71–1.40) or for any other outcome at 3 or 6 months. In conclusion, patients receiving rivaroxaban or apixaban showed similar risks of the composite of recurrent VTE or any bleed resulting in hospitalization in patients with cancer-associated VTE. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05461807.

Key Points

  • Rivaroxaban and apixaban have similar effectiveness and safety for treatment of cancer-associated VTE through 6 months.

  • Clinicians should therefore consider patient preference and adherence when choosing the optimal anticoagulant.

Keywords

apixaban - rivaroxaban - venous thromboembolism - cancer-associated VTE

a At time of study conduct, currently affiliated with Janssen Research and Development, Barcelona, Spain.


b At time of study conduct, currently consultant for Bayer AG.


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 03. März 2023

Angenommen: 17. Mai 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
10. Juli 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Heit JA. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015; 12 (08) 464-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hutten BA, Prins MH, Gent M, Ginsberg J, Tijssen JG, Büller HR. Incidence of recurrent thromboembolic and bleeding complications among patients with venous thromboembolism in relation to both malignancy and achieved international normalized ratio: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18 (17) 3078-3083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Piccioli A. et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 2002; 100 (10) 3484-3488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Khorana AA, Noble S, Lee AYY. et al. Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16 (09) 1891-1894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Key NS, Khorana AA, Kuderer NM. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (05) 496-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J 2020; 41 (04) 543-603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C. et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (04) 927-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Farge D, Frere C, Connors JM. et al; International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC) advisory panel. 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23 (07) e334-e347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Streiff MB, Holmstrom B, Angelini D. et al. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19 (10) 1181-1201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sabatino J, De Rosa S, Polimeni A, Sorrentino S, Indolfi C. Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with active cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiooncol 2020; 2 (03) 428-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Optum. Optum EHR data. 2022. Accessed March 8, 2022 at: https://www.optum.com/business/solutions/life-sciences/real-world-data/ehr-data.html
    PubMed
  • 12 White RH, Garcia M, Sadeghi B. et al. Evaluation of the predictive value of ICD-9-CM coded administrative data for venous thromboembolism in the United States. Thromb Res 2010; 126 (01) 61-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP, Daugherty JR, Smalley WE, Ray WA. An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011; 20 (06) 560-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Prasad V, Jena AB. Prespecified falsification end points: can they validate true observational associations?. JAMA 2013; 309 (03) 241-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P. et al; Hokusai VTE Cancer Investigators. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (07) 615-624
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Coleman C, Caroti KS, Abdelgawwad K. et al. Patient characteristics and temporal changes in anticoagulation treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with cancer-associated thrombosis: an Oscar-US Analysis. Blood 2021; 138 (Suppl. 01) 2132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46 (03) 399-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Langan SM, Schmidt SA, Wing K. et al. The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE). BMJ 2018; 363: k3532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Riaz IB, Fuentes HE, Naqvi SAA. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants compared with dalteparin for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: a living, interactive systematic review and network meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2022; 97 (02) 308-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lanéelle D, Le Brun C, Mauger C. et al; SFMV VTE Study Group. Patient characteristics and preferences regarding anticoagulant treatment in venous thromboembolic disease. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8: 675969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Alberts MJ, Peacock WF, Fields LE. et al. Association between once- and twice-daily direct oral anticoagulant adherence in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients and rates of ischemic stroke. Int J Cardiol 2016; 215: 11-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Kong SX, Zhao SZ. Administrative databases and outcomes assessment: an overview of issues and potential utility. J Manag Care Pharm 1999; 5: 215-222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar