Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772458
Virtual versus In-Person Ophthalmology Interviews: Perceptions of U.S. Ophthalmology Fellowship Applicants in 2022–2023
Abstract
Purpose Despite easing restrictions on social distancing and travel since the beginning of coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews remain a widely used format for ophthalmology fellowship interviews. This study aims to evaluate the relative benefits and drawbacks of in-person versus virtual interviews during a cycle where both formats were prevalent.
Methods A prospective cross-sectional study surveyed all fellowship applicants (N = 311) who applied to Wills Eye Hospital and Bascom Palmer Eye Institute during the 2022 to 2023 application cycle.
Results A total of 59 (19%) applicants responded to the survey, with the majority being male (53.0%) and between the ages of 20 and 35 (91.3%). There was no statistically significant difference between the number of virtual and in-person interviews attended or the total number of interviews attended. The highest ranked limitations of the virtual interview process were limited exposure to details of the program structure, limited opportunity to exhibit applicants' strengths to the program, and limited exposure to the fellows. The highest ranked strengths were less pressure during interviews, greater scheduling flexibility, and ability to interview at more fellowship programs. The highest ranked limitations of the in-person interview process were more pressure during interviews, inability to interview at all desired fellowship programs, and decreased scheduling flexibility. The highest ranked strengths based on median rankings were greater exposure to details of the program structure, greater ability to exhibit an applicant's strengths to the program, and greater exposure to the geographic location/city.
Conclusion While both in-person and virtual interviews have their own benefits and limitations, virtual interviews appear to be more cost-effective and time-efficient while in-person interviews provide better opportunities to assess program fit and culture. A hybrid format that combines the ideal aspects of both formats may be an optimal solution.
* Elliot G. Cherkas and Charlotte N. Shields are represented as co-first authors.
** The further information has been provided in the [Appendix A] (availaible in the online version).
Publication History
Received: 26 April 2023
Accepted: 17 July 2023
Article published online:
12 September 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Patel SN, Cherkas EG, Shields CN. et al. Virtual ophthalmology fellowship interviews: perceptions of U.S. ophthalmology fellowship applicants in 2020. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e102-e107
- 2 Shah SM, Barkmeier AJ, Dalvin LA, Tooley AA. Applicant perceptions regarding the 2020 to 2021 virtual ophthalmology residency interview and match season. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e144-e150
- 3 Ahmed B, Ly V, Parikh A. et al. Perceptions of a virtual interview exercise for ophthalmology residency applicants. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e256-e263
- 4 Jebaraj A, Warner J, Pettey J, Jardine G, Vegunta S. Ophthalmology residency virtual interviews in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives of applicants, selection committee members, and current residents. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (02) e170-e174
- 5 Steren B, Parikh A, Ahmed B, Young B, Sridhar J, Kombo N. COVID-19 and the ophthalmology residency match: data from applicants' perspectives. J Acad Ophthalmol 2021; 13 (01) e73-e77
- 6 Relke N, Soleas E, Lui CJ. Internal medicine residents' and program directors' perception of virtual interviews during COVID-19: a national survey. Can Med Educ J 2022; 13 (03) 37-42
- 7 Armstrong A, Kroener L, Cohen JG. et al. Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology. Med Educ Online 2022; 27 (01) 2068993
- 8 Robinson KA, Shin B, Gangadharan SP. A comparison between in-person and virtual fellowship interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2021; 78 (04) 1175-1181
- 9 Nirmalan A, Baiyasi A, Jassal J, Kasetty V, Goldman D. Applicant Perspective on the 2021 Ophthalmology Residency Cycle - A Post-Match Analysis. Research Square; 2022 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1561994/v1
- 10 Peyser A, Gulersen M, Nimaroff M, Mullin C, Goldman RH. Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21 (01) 449
- 11 Hamade N, Bhavsar-Burke I, Jansson-Knodell C. et al. Virtual gastroenterology fellowship recruitment during COVID-19 and its implications for the future. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67 (06) 2019-2028
- 12 Ferry AM, Asaad M, Elmorsi R. et al. Impact of the virtual format on plastic surgery residency and fellowship interviews: a national cross-sectional study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (03) 684e-690e
- 13 Domingo A, Rdesinski RE, Stenson A. et al. Virtual residency interviews: applicant perceptions regarding virtual interview effectiveness, advantages, and barriers. J Grad Med Educ 2022; 14 (02) 224-228
- 14 Haisley KR, Renshaw SM, Needleman BJ, Narula VK, Poulose BK, Perry KA. Virtual interviews for surgical fellowship are an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews for applicants and faculty alike. Surg Innov 2022; 29 (06) 781-787
- 15 Ophthalmology Fellowship Match Stats 2017–2022. SF Match - residency and Fellowship Matching Services. Accessed June 16, 2023 at: https://www.sfmatch.org/specialty/ophthalmology-fellowship/Statistics