An Ophthalmology Virtual Externship during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Background The evolution of medical school curricula, characterized by truncated preclinical periods and reduced emphasis on ophthalmology, presents formidable obstacles to early exposure for aspiring medical students. The constraints imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic further exacerbated the limitations on opportunities, compelling the implementation of innovative initiatives aimed at augmenting students' ophthalmology education through virtual means.

Purpose This article assesses the impact of an Ophthalmology Virtual Externship (OVE) on medical students' knowledge, interest, confidence, and seeking mentorship in ophthalmology.

Materials and Methods A total of 76 students voluntarily participated in the program. The OVE encompassed four virtual sessions, facilitated by 4th year medical students employing a near-peer mentorship framework. The initiative was tailored for 2nd and 3rd year medical students and was conducted under the supervision of a faculty member. All participating students completed both pre- and postexternship surveys utilizing a 7-point Likert scale to gauge their levels of interest, confidence, and inclination toward mentorship opportunities in the field of ophthalmology. Furthermore, assessments of ophthalmology knowledge were administered prior to and subsequent to the externship participation. The degree of satisfaction derived from the OVE experience was also evaluated.

Results Participation in the OVE significantly elevated confidence in knowledge (p < 0.001) and mentorship interest (p = 0.029). Ophthalmology knowledge test scores also notably improved post-OVE across all participants, irrespective of prior experience (p < 0.001), with the most significant increase observed among 2nd and 3rd year students (p < 0.0001). After OVE participation, 73% of students expressed intent to pursue ophthalmology opportunities, including mentorship or research. The OVE received an average Likert score of 6.35 out of 7 for student satisfaction.

Conclusion The OVE serves as a virtual learning instrument beneficial for 2nd and 3rd year students with a proclivity for ophthalmology, offering a means to circumvent curriculum-related constraints. Moreover, given the decline in formal ophthalmic education, our study contributes to future research assessing the effectiveness of an OVE in addressing ophthalmic knowledge gaps among all medical students.

Keywords

virtual externship - ophthalmology - confidence - mentorship

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. März 2023

Angenommen: 09. November 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. Dezember 2023

• References

• 1 Fagel BG. Medical student externship as an opportunity to expand the base of medical education. The viewpoint of the Student American Medical Association. JAMA 1970; 213 (12) 2059-2061
• 2 Cronau H, Haines DJ. Medical Student Summer Externship Program: increasing the number matching in family practice. Med Educ Online 2004; 9 (01) 4362
• 3 Branstetter IV BF, Faix LE, Humphrey AL, Schumann JB. Preclinical medical student training in radiology: the effect of early exposure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (01) W9-14
• 4 Baker KS, Cormican D, Seidman PA. Summer anesthesiology externship: demonstrating the ability of early clinical involvement to educate and increase specialty interest. J Educ Perioper Med 2012; 14 (04) E063
• 5 Ross DA. National Neuroscience Curriculum Initiative “Quarantine Curriculum” Committee. Creating a “Quarantine Curriculum” to enhance teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med 2020; 95 (08) 1125-1126
• 6 Sam AH, Millar KR, Lupton MGF. Digital clinical placement for medical students in response to COVID-19. Acad Med 2020; 95 (08) 1126
• 7 Holmberg MH, Dela Cruz E, Longino A, Longino N, Çoruh B, Merel SE. Development of a single-institution virtual internal medicine subinternship with near-peer teaching in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Med 2021; 96 (12) 1706-1710
• 8 Moxon NR, Goyal A, Giaconi JA. et al. The state of ophthalmology medical student education in the United States: an update. Ophthalmology 2020; 127 (11) 1451-1453
• 9 Hawthorne MR, Dinh A. Meeting the demand of the future: a curriculum to stimulate interest in careers in primary care internal medicine. Med Educ Online 2017; 22 (01) 1340780
• 10 Quillen DA, Harper RA, Haik BG. Medical student education in ophthalmology: crisis and opportunity. Ophthalmology 2005; 112 (11) 1867-1868
• 11 Kalina RE, Van Dyk HJ, Weinstein GW. Ophthalmology teaching in medical schools. J Med Educ 1981; 56 (02) 143-145
• 12 Clarkson JG. Training in ophthalmology is critical for all physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121 (09) 1327
• 13 Stern GA. The Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology Education Committee. Teaching ophthalmology to primary care physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113 (06) 722-724
• 14 Cobbs L, Tsui E, Haberman I. et al. Student perceptions of the ophthalmology curriculum in medical school. J Acad Ophthalmol 2018; 10: e79-e82
• 15 Gupta RR, Lam WC. Medical students' self-confidence in performing direct ophthalmoscopy in clinical training. Can J Ophthalmol 2006; 41 (02) 169-174
• 16 Drees BM, Omurtag K. Accelerated medical education: past, present and future. Mo Med 2012; 109 (05) 352-356
• 17 Cangiarella J, Gillespie C, Shea JA, Morrison G, Abramson SB. Accelerating medical education: a survey of deans and program directors. Med Educ Online 2016; 21: 31794
• 18 Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: how computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9 (06) 583-602
• 19 Guze PA. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015; 126: 260-270
• 20 Serhan D. Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: students' attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. Intl J Technol Educat Sci 2020; 4 (04) 9
• 21 Lochner L, Wieser H, Waldboth S, Mischo-Kelling M. Combining traditional anatomy lectures with e-learning activities: how do students perceive their learning experience?. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 69-74
• 22 Silbert BI, Lake FR. Peer-assisted learning in teaching clinical examination to junior medical students. Med Teach 2012; 34 (05) 392-397
• 23 Lim SYS, Koh EYH, Tan BJX, Toh YP, Mason S, Krishna LKR. Enhancing geriatric oncology training through a combination of novice mentoring and peer and near-peer mentoring: a thematic analysis of mentoring in medicine between 2000 and 2017. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11 (04) 566-575
• 24 Khapre M, Deol R, Sharma A, Badyal D. Near-peer tutor: a solution for quality medical education in faculty constraint setting. Cureus 2021; 13 (07) e16416
• 25 Wright S, Wong A, Newill C. The impact of role models on medical students. J Gen Intern Med 1997; 12 (01) 53-56
• 26 Noble J. Factors influencing career choice in ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 2006; 41 (05) 596-599
• 27 Nimmons D, Giny S, Rosenthal J. Medical student mentoring programs: current insights. Adv Med Educ Pract 2019; 10: 113-123
• 28 Hall S, Harrison CH, Stephens J. et al. The benefits of being a near-peer teacher. Clin Teach 2018; 15 (05) 403-407
• 29 Almarzooq ZI, Lopes M, Kochar A. Virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a disruptive technology in graduate medical education. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75 (20) 2635-2638
• 30 Huynh R. The role of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2017; 92 (04) 430