PDF herunterladen
CC BY 4.0 · The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology 2024; 08(01): 027-030
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778119
Original Article

The Utility of Routinely Performing a Short-Interval Cholecystogram following Cholecystostomy Tube Placement

Jospeh Geisler
1   Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
,
Mohammad Amarneh 
1   Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States
2   Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of routinely performing short-interval cholecystogram (SIC) following percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) placement and to identify predictive factors for early PCT dislodgment.

Materials and Methods We conducted retrospective review of 224 adult patients who underwent PCT placement for acute cholecystitis at a single tertiary care medical center. SIC was defined as occurring at least 1 day after PCT placement and prior to the patient being discharged from the hospital. Early PCT dislodgment was defined as occurring within 2 months of placement.

Results Among 224 patients, 181 (80%) patients underwent SIC on average 3 days after PCT. Of these, 175 (97%) had PCT appropriately positioned, while 6 (3%) showed tube malposition outside the gallbladder. Patients who underwent a SIC demonstrated a similar rate of early tube dislodgment compared to those discharged without this procedure (12.6 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.81). Notably, patients with a body mass index exceeding 40 kg/m2 had a higher likelihood of early cholecystostomy tube dislodgment (29 vs. 14%, p = 0.038).

Conclusion Routinely performing a SIC following PCT may offer limited benefit. We recommend selectively performing this study on patients with clinically suspected tube dislodgement.

Keywords

acute cholecystitis - percutaneous cholecystostomy - short-interval cholecystogram - PCT dislodgement

Ethical Approval Statement

This study has obtained IRB approval from the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board and the need for informed consent was waived.




Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Januar 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Mayumi T, Okamoto K, Takada T. et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: management bundles for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2018; 25 (01) 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bundy J, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, Shields JJ, Chick JFB. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: long-term outcomes in 324 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41 (06) 928-934
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wadhwa V, Trivedi PS, Makary MS. et al. Utilization and outcomes of cholecystostomy and cholecystectomy in patients admitted with acute cholecystitis: a nationwide analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216 (06) 1558-1565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wise JN, Gervais DA, Akman A, Harisinghani M, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy catheter removal and incidence of clinically significant bile leaks: a clinical approach to catheter management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (05) 1647-1651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De Geus T, Moriarty HK, Waters PS. et al. Outcomes of patients treated with upfront cholecystostomy for severe acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30 (01) 79-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Boules M, Haskins IN, Farias-Kovac M. et al. What is the fate of the cholecystostomy tube following percutaneous cholecystostomy?. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (04) 1707-1712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pang KW, Tan CH, Loh S. et al. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 2016; 40 (11) 2735-2744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Duncan C, Hunt SJ, Gade T, Shlansky-Goldberg RD, Nadolski GJ. Outcomes of percutaneous cholecystostomy in the presence of ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (04) 562-6.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kallini JR, Patel DC, Linaval N, Phillips EH, Van Allan RJ. Comparing clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous transperitoneal and transhepatic cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. Acta Radiol 2021; 62 (09) 1142-1147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jonasch D, Raza S, Voutsinas N. Abstract no. 176 influence of clinical and procedural factors on rate of cholecystostomy tube dislodgement and other complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2023; 34 (03) S80-S81
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar