Download PDF
Pharmacopsychiatry 2002; 35(1): 12-18
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19833
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Safety and Efficacy of Idebenone versus Tacrine
in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease:
Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Multicenter Study

H.  Gutzmann1 , K.-P.  Kühl2 , D.  Hadler3 , M.  A.  Rapp1, 4
  • 1Wilhelm Griesinger Hospital, Department of Gerontopsychiatry, Berlin, Germany
  • 2Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Gerontopsychiatry, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Takeda Europe R & D Center, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
  • 4Now at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
The authors wish to dedicate this article to Professor Dr. S. Kanowski, Head of the Department of Gerontopsychiatry, Freie Universität of Berlin, on the occasion of his 65th birthday on February 23, 2000. Funding This study was in part supported by an educational grant from Takeda Europe to PD Dr. H. Gutzmann.
Further Information

Publication History

28. 11. 1999 · Revised 28. 2. 2001

28. 6. 2000

Publication Date:
30 January 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of idebenone vs. tacrine in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter study in patients suffering from dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) of mild to moderate degree. Diagnosis was based on DSM-III-R (primary degenerative dementia) and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (probable Alzheimer's disease). A total of 203 patients of both sexes aged between 40 and 90 years were randomized to either idebenone 360 mg/day (n = 104) or tacrine up to 160 mg/day (n = 99) and treated for 60 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the Efficacy Index Score (EIS). The EIS combines dropout as well as the relevant improvements individually across the three levels of assessment (cognitive function, activities of daily living, global function). Secondary outcome measures were the ADAS-Cog score, the NOSGER-IADL score and the clinical global response (CGI-Improvement). After 60 weeks of treatment, 28.8 % of the patients randomized to idebenone, but only 9.1 % of the patients randomized to tacrine were still on the drug. In the LOCF analysis, 50 % of the patients randomized to idebenone but only 39.4 % of the patients randomized to tacrine showed an improvement in the Efficacy Index Score or at least one of the secondary outcome variables. The primary efficacy measurement was the change of the Efficacy Index Score from baseline to the assessment after 60 weeks treatment. The analysis was done on intention-to-treat (ITT) in a before-and-after test design. Patients randomized to idebenone showed a higher benefit from treatment than patients randomized to tacrine. We conclude that the benefit-risk ratio is favorable for idebenone compared to tacrine, and furthermore, that this ratio is likely to be similar when comparing idebenone to other cholinesterase inhibitors.

References

  • 1 Amaducci L, Angst J, Bech P, Benkert O, Bruinvels J, Engel R R. et al . Consensus conference on the methodology of clinical trials of “nootropics”, Munich, 1989.  Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990;  4 171-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 American Psychiatric Association (APA) . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association, Revised third edition 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bundesgesundsheitsamt (BGA) . Empfehlungen zum Wirkungsnachweis von Nootropika im Indikationsbereich “Demenz” (Phase III).  Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 1991;  34 342-350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cummings J L, Cyrus P A, Bieber F. Metrifonate treatment of the cognitive deficit of Alzheimer's disease.  Neurology. 1998;  50 1214-1221
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Degli-Esposti M, Cerelli V, Ghelli A, Ratta M, Crimi M, Sangiorgi S. et al . Functional alterations of the mitochondrially encoded ND4 subunit.  FEBS Letters. 1994;  352 375-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Folstein M F, Folstein S E, McHugh P R. “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.  J Psychiat Res. 1975;  12 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gutzmann H, Hadler D. Sustained Efficacy and Safety of Idebenone in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: Update on a 2-Year Double-Blind Multicentre Study.  J Neural Transm. 1998;  54 301-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville: National Institute of Mental Health 1976
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hachinski V C, Lassen N A, Marshall J. Multi-infarct dementia: A cause of mental deterioration in the elderly.  Lancet. 1974;  II 207-210
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ihl R, Weyer G. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale. Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung. Manual. Weinheim: Beltz
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Kanowski S, Coper H. Das hirnorganische Psychosyndrom als Ziel pharmazeutischer Beeinflussung. In: Bente D, Coper H, Kanowski S (eds.) Hirnorganische Psychosyndrome im Alter. Berlin: Springer 1982: 3-21
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Knapp M J, Knopman D S, Salomon P R. A 30-week randomized controlled clinical trial of high-dose tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease.  JAMA. 1994;  271 985-991
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lehmann E. Practical and valid approach to evaluate the efficacy of nootropic drugs by means of rating scales. Pharmacopsychiatry 1984: 71-75
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Lienert G A. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim:. Beltz 1967
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Lord F M, Novick M R. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 16 McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M F, Katzmann R, Price D, Stadlan E M. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINDS-AIREN Work Group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.  Neurology. 1984;  34 939-944
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Parnetti L, Senin U, Mecocci P. Cognitive enhancement therapy for Alzheimer's disease.  Drugs. 1997;  53 752-768
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rich J B, Rasmusson D X, Folstein M F, Carson K A, Kawas C, Brandt J. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Alzheimer's disease.  Neurology. 1995;  45 51-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rogers S L, Doody R S, Mohs R C. Donezepil improves cognition and global function in Alzheimer's disease: a 15-week, placebo controlled study.  Arch Intern Med. 1998;  158 1021-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rosen W G, Mohs R C, Davis K L. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease.  Am J Psychiatry. 1984;  141 1356-1364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas R G. A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol, or both as treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's disease cooperative study.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  336 1216-1222
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schneider L S, Farlow M R, Henderson V W. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on response to tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease.  Neurology. 1996;  46 1580-1584
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Shadlen M F, Larson E B. What's new in Alzheimer's disease treatment?.  Postgrad Med. 1999;  105 146-157
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Spiegel R, Brunner C, Ermini-Fünfschilling D, Monsch A, Notter M, Puxty J. et al . A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric out- and inpatients: The NOSGER (Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients).  J Am Geriat Soc. 1991;  39 339-347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Watkins P B, Zimmerman H J, Knapp M J, Gracon S I, Lewis K W. Hepatotoxic effects of tacrine administration in patients with Alzheimer's disease.  JAMA. 1994;  271 992-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Weyer G, Erzigkeit H, Kanowski S, Ihl R, Hadler D. Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Reliability and validity in a multicenter study.  Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;  9 123-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Weyer G, Ihl R, Schambach M. Alzheimer' Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS). Deutschsprachige Bearbeitung. Dokumentationsbogen und Testmaterial. Weinheim: Beltz 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 28 World Medical Association .Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Amended by 41th World Medical Assembly, Hong Kong September 1989
    Google Scholar

Priv. Doz. Dr. med. Hans Gutzmann

Retzdorffpromenade 3

12161 Berlin

Germany

Phone: (+49) (30) 82 70 28 67

Fax: (+49) (30) 82 70 28 68

Fax: gutzmann@zedat.fu-berlin.de

      >