Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002; 06(3): 233-240
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36721
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Bone Densitometry in Children

R. R. van Rijn, C. van Kuijk
  • Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 January 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Compared with adults, limited attention has been paid to bone densitometry in children. However, due to the recognition of the importance of peak bone mass and the increased capabilities to treat children with diseases that affect bone growth and/or metabolism, bone densitometry is used more often in children. This article will discuss the available bone densitometry techniques and the limitations of their use in children. The article is concluded with a discussion on specific problems that can be encountered in pediatric bone densitometry.

KEYWORD

Bone density - densitometry - child - bone and bones.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Fässler A C, Bonjour J-P. Osteoporosis as a pediatric problem.  Pediatr Clin N Am . 1995;  42 811-824
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dent C E. Keynote address: problems in metabolic bone disease. In: Frame B, Parfitt M, Duncan H, eds. Clinical Aspects of Metabolic Bone Disease Amsterdam: Exerpta Medica 1973: 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 3 National Institute of Health. Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. NIH Consensus Statement 2000. Washington, DC: National Institute of Health; 2000: 1-36
  • 4 Van der Sluis M I, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama S M P F. Osteoporosis in childhood: bone density of children in health and disease.  J Pediatric Endocrinol Metabol   2001;  14 817-832
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Augado F, Revilla M, Hernandez E R, Villa L F, Rico H. Behaviour of bone mass measurements. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, total bone mineral content, ultrasound bone velocity, and computed metacarpal radiogrammetry, with age, gonadal status, and weight in healthy women.  Invest Radiol . 1996;  31 218-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jørgensen J T, Andersen P B, Rosholm A, Hanover Bjarnason N. Digital x-ray radiogrammetry: a new appendicular bone densitometric method with high precision.  Clin Physiol . 2001;  20 330-335
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Black D M, Palermo L, Sorensen T. A normative reference database study for Pronosco X-posure system.  J Clin Densito . 2001;  4 5-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Warren S L, Bishop F W, Hodge H C, van Huysen G. A quantitative method for studying the roentgen-ray absorption of tooth slabs.  Am J Roentgenol Radiat Ther . 1934;  31 663-672
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Trouerbach W T, Hoornstra K, Birkenhäger J C, Zwamborn A W. Roentgendensitometric study of the phalanx.  Diagn Imag Clin Med . 1985;  54 64-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 van Rijn R R, Lequin M H, van Leeuwen J W, Hop W CJ, van Kuijk C. Radiographic absorptiometry of the middle phalanx (digit II) in a Caucasian pediatric population: normative data.  Osteoporosis Int . 2000;  11 240-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Boot A M, de Ridder A M, Pols H A, Krenning E P, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama M S. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents: relation to puberty, calcium intake and physical activity.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab . 1997;  82 57-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gilsanz V, Gibbens D T, Roe T F. Vertebral bone density in children: effect of puberty.  Radiology . 1988;  166 847-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Genant H K, Engelke K, Fuerst T. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art [review].  J Bone Miner Res . 1996;  11 707-730
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Inoue T, Yamazaki K, Kushida K. Utility of dual x-ray absorptiometry and single x-ray absorptiometry as diagnostic tools for involutional osteoporosis.  Osteoporosis Int . 1997;  7(Suppl 3) 117-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wahner H W, Steiger T, von Stetten E. Instruments and measurement techniques. In: Wahner HW, Fogelman I, eds. The Evaluation of Osteoporosis: Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994: 14-34
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Carter D R, Bouxsein M L, Marcus R. New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data.  J Bone Miner Res . 1992;  7 137-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kröger H, Kotaniemi A, Vainio P, Alhava E. Bone densitometry of the spine and femur in children by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.  Bone Miner . 1992;  17 75-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Faulkner R A, Bailey D A, Drinkwater D T. Bone densitometry in Canadian children 8-17 years of age.  Calcif Tissue Int . 1996;  59 344-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Boot A M, Bouquet J, de Ridder A J M, Krenning E P, de Muink Keizer-Schrama S M P F. Determinants of body composition, measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry, in Dutch children and adolescents.  Am J Clin Nutr . 1997;  66 232-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bolotin H H. An analytic and quantitative exposition of patient-specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA-derived in-vivo BMD measurements.  Med Phys . 1998;  25 139-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tothill P, Avenell A. Errors in dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine owing to fat distribution and soft tissue thickness during weight change.  Br J Radiol . 1994;  67 71-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bolotin H H, Sievanen H, Grashuis J L, Kuiper J W, Jarvinen T L. Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.  J Bone Miner Res . 2001;  16 417-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 van Kuijk C, Genant H K. Quantitative CT in osteoporosis. In: Thrall JA, ed. Current Practice in Radiology St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book 1993: 336-338
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Genant H K, Cann C E, Pozzi-Mucelli R S, Kanter A S. Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative CT: clinical feasibility and normative data.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1983;  7 554
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lang T F, Keyak J H, Heitz M W. Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength.  Bone . 1997;  21 101-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gilsanz V, Roe T F, Mora S, Costin G, Goodman W G. Changes in vertebral bone density in black girls and white girls during childhood and puberty.  N Engl J Med . 1991;  325 1597-1600
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Neu C M, Manz F, Rauch F, Merkel A, Schoenau E. Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography.  Bone . 2001;  28 227-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jaworski M, Lebiedowski M, Lorenc R C, Trempe J. Ultrasound bone measurement in pediatric subjects.  Calcif Tissue Int . 1995;  56 368-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Povoroznjuk V V, Tatarchuk T F, Mazur I P, Tkachenko L P, Orlik T V. Use of ultrasound bone densitometry for evaluation of bone tissue in children.  Osteoporos Int . 1997;  7 298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hans D, Njeh C F, Genant H K, Meunier J-P. Quantitative ultrasound in bone status assessment.  Rev Rhum [English ed.] . 1998;  65 489-498
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 van den Bergh P J, Noordam C, Ozyilmaz A. Calcaneal ultrasound imaging in healthy children and adolescents: relation of the ultrasound parameters BUA and SOS to age, body weight, height, foot dimensions and pubertal stage.  Osteoporos Int . 2000;  11 967-976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Baroncelli G I, Federico G, Bertelloni S. Bone quality assessment by quantitative ultrasound of proximal phalanxes of the hand in healthy subjects aged 3-21 years.  Ped Res . 2001;  49 713-718
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Barkmann R, Rohrschneider W, Vierling M. German pediatric reference data for quantitative transverse ultrasound of finger phalanges.  Osteoporos Int . 2002;  13 55-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Foldes A J, Rimon A, Keinan D D, Popovtzer M M. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: a novel approach for assessment of bone status.  Bone . 1995;  17 363-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lequin M H, van Rijn R R, Robben S GF, van Kuijk C. Normal values for quantitative tibial ultrasound bone assessment in a Caucasian pediatric population (aged 6 to 19 years).  Calcif Tiss Int . 2000;  67 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Nemet D, Eiakim A, Wolash B, Dolphin T. Bone strength measurement in premature infants by quantitative ultrasound. Advancing Children's Health Conference, Boston, 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Molgaard C, Thomsen B L, Prentice A, Cole T J, Michaelsen K F. Whole body bone mineral content in healthy children and adolescents.  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 1997;  76 9-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Slosman D O, Rizolli R, Bonjour J-P. Bone absorptiometry: a critical appraisal of various methods.  Acta Paediatr . 1995;  411 9-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Cundy T, Cornish J, Evans M C. Sources of interracial variation in bone mineral density.  J Bone Miner Res . 1995;  10 368-373
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Davis J W, Novotny R, Wasnich R D, Ross P D. Ethnic, anthropometric, and lifestyle associations with regional variations in peak bone mass.  Calcif Tissue Int . 1999;  65 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 WHO Study Group. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis Geneva: World Health Organization Technical Reports Series; 1994
      >