Thromb Haemost 2013; 110(06): 1152-1163
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-02-0170
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Impact of age on the efficacy and safety of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in medical patients

Subgroup analysis from the EXCLAIM randomised trial
Roger D. Yusen*
1   Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
,
Russell D. Hull
2   University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Sebastian M. Schellong
3   Municipal Hospital Dresden Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Germany
,
Victor F. Tapson
4   Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
,
Manuel Monreal
5   Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
,
Meyer-Michel Samama
6   Cochin-Broca-Hôtel Dieu University Hospital, Paris, France and Biomnis Laboratories, Ivry-sur-Seine, France
,
Min Chen
7   *Sanofi US, Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA
,
Bruno Deslandes
8   Sanofi, Paris, France
,
Alexander G. G. Turpie
9   McMaster University and HHS McMaster Clinic, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Institutsangaben
Financial support: Sanofi sponsored the EXCLAIM study. Sanofi U.S., Inc., funded editorial/writing support in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors claim full responsibility for all content and editorial decisions, and they did not receive financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of the manuscript.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received: 25. Februar 2013

Accepted after major revision: 13. August 2013

Publikationsdatum:
30. November 2017 (online)

Summary

The EXCLAIM study enrolled hospitalised acutely ill medical patients with age >40 years and recently-reduced mobility into a trial of extended-duration anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis. This post-hoc analysis evaluated the impact of age on patient outcomes. After completion of open-label therapy with enoxaparin 40 mg once-daily (10 ± 4 days), eligible patients underwent randomisation to receive double-blind therapy of enoxaparin (n=2,975) or placebo (n=2,988) for 28 ± 4 days. During follow-up, the venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk increased with age in both treatment groups. In patients with age >75 years, those who received extended-duration enoxaparin had lower incidence of VTE (2.5% vs 6.7%; absolute difference [AD] [95% confidence interval]: −4.2% [−6.5, −2.0]), proximal deep-vein thrombosis (2.5% vs 6.6%; AD −4.1 % [−6.2, −2.0]), and symptomatic VTE (0.3% vs 1.5%; AD −1.2% [−2.2, −0.3]), in comparison to those who received placebo. In patients with age ≤75 years, those who received enoxaparin had reduced VTE (2.4% vs 2.8%; AD −0.4% [−1.5, 0.7]) and symptomatic VTE (0.2% vs 0.7%; AD −0.6% [−1.0, −0.1]) in comparison to those who received placebo. In both age subgroups, patients who received enoxaparin had increased rates of major bleeding versus those who received placebo: age >75 years (0.6% vs 0.2%; AD +0.3% [−0.2, 0.9], respectively); age ≤75 years (0.7% vs 0.2%; AD +0.5% [0.1, 0.9]). Patients in both age subgroups that received enoxaparin had similar low bleeding rates (0.6% and 0.7%, respectively). VTE risk increased with age, though the bleeding risk did not. Patients with age >75 years had a more favourable benefit-to-harm profile than younger patients.

* Dr. Chen was an employee of Sanofi at the time of this study.


 
  • References

  • 1 Alikhan R, Cohen AT, Combe S. et al MEDENOX Study. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with acute medical illness: analysis of the MEDENOX Study. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 963-968.
  • 2 Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN. et al. Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based, cohort study. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 445-453.
  • 3 Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Group d’Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 657-660.
  • 4 Oger E, Bressollette L, Nonent M. et al. High prevalence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis on admission in a medical unit among elderly patients. Thromb Haemost 2002; 88: 592-597.
  • 5 Anderson Jr FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ. et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-938.
  • 6 Stein PD, Hull RD, Kayali F. et al. Venous thromboembolism according to age: the impact of an aging population. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 2260-2265.
  • 7 Naess IA, Christiansen SC, Romundstad P. et al. Incidence and mortality of venous thrombosis: a population-based study. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 692-699.
  • 8 Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D. et al. Venous thromboembolism in the elderly. A community-based perspective. Thromb Haemost 2008; 100: 780-788.
  • 9 Campbell NR, Hull RD, Brant R. et al. Aging and heparin-related bleeding. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 857-860.
  • 10 Hutten BA, Lensing AW, Kraaijenhagen RA. et al. Safety of treatment with oral anticoagulants in the elderly. A systematic review. Drugs Aging 1999; 14: 303-312.
  • 11 Palareti G, Hirsh J, Legnani C. et al. Oral anticoagulation treatment in the elderly: a nested, prospective, case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 470-478.
  • 12 Pengo V, Legnani C, Noventa F. et al ISCOAT Study Group. (Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy). Oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and risk of bleeding. A Multi-center Inception Cohort Study. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 418-422.
  • 13 Scott PJ. Anticoagulant drugs in the elderly: the risks usually outweight the benefits. Br Med J 1988; 297: 1261-1263.
  • 14 Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M. et al IMPROVE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: findings from the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest 2007; 132: 936-945.
  • 15 Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF. et al ENDORSE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet 2008; 371: 387-394.
  • 16 Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY. et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 793-800.
  • 17 Leizorovicz A, Cohen AT, Turpie AG. et al PREVENT Medical Thromboprophylaxis Study Group. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of dalteparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 874-879.
  • 18 Cohen AT, Davidson BL, Gallus AS. et al ARTEMIS Investigators. Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in older acute medical patients: randomised placebo controlled trial. Br Med J 2006; 332: 325-329.
  • 19 Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS. et al American College of Chest Physicians. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141 (Suppl. 02) e195S-e226S.
  • 20 Qaseem A, Chou R, Humphrey LL. et al Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 625-632.
  • 21 Nicolaides AN, Fareed J, Kakkar AK. et al Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. International consensus statement (guidelines according to scientific evidence). Int Angiol 2006; 25: 101-161.
  • 22 Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF. et al EXCLAIM (Extended Prophylaxis for Venous ThromboEmbolism in Acutely Ill Medical Patients With Prolonged Immobilization) study. Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 8-18.
  • 23 Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR. et al. Extended-duration rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients: MAGELLAN study protocol. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 31: 407-416.
  • 24 Goldhaber SZ, Leizorovicz A, Kakkar AK. et al ADOPT Trial Investigators. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2167-2177.
  • 25 Hull RD, Schellong SM, Tapson VF. et al. Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recent reduced mobility: methodology for the EXCLAIM study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2006; 22: 31-38.
  • 26 Silverstein MD, Heit JA, Mohr DN. et al. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 585-593.
  • 27 López-Jiménez L, Montero M, González-Fajardo JA. et al RIETE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism in very elderly patients: findings from a prospective registry (RIETE). Haematologica 2006; 91: 1046-1051.
  • 28 Piazza G, Seddighzadeh A, Goldhaber SZ. Deep-vein thrombosis in the elderly. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2008; 14: 393-398.
  • 29 Vasco B, Villalba JC, Lopez-Jimenez L. et al RIETE Investigators. Venous thromboembolism in nonagenarians. Findings from the RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 1112-1118.
  • 30 Engbers MJ, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Rosendaal FR. Venous thrombosis in the elderly: incidence, risk factors and risk groups. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2105-2112.
  • 31 Kent DM, Lindenauer PK. Aggregating and disaggregating patients in clinical trials and their subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153: 51-52.
  • 32 Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet 1994; 343: 687-691.
  • 33 Lightowlers S, McGuire A. Cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke. Stroke 1998; 29: 1827-1832.
  • 34 Sebastian JL, Tresch DD. Use of oral anticoagulants in older patients. Drugs Aging 2000; 16: 409-435.
  • 35 Mahe I, Gouin-Thibault I, Drouet L. et al. Elderly medical patients treated with prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin: influence of renal function on anti-Xa activity level. Drugs Aging 2007; 24: 63-71.
  • 36 Alikhan R, Cohen AT, Combe S. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients with enoxaparin: a subgroup analysis of the MEDENOX study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2003; 14: 341-346.
  • 37 Kucher N, Leizorovicz A, Vaitkus PT. et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed low-dose dalteparin in preventing venous thromboembolism among obese or elderly hospitalized patients: a subgroup analysis of the PREVENT trial. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 341-345.
  • 38 Dahan R, Houlbert D, Caulin C. et al. Prevention of deep vein thrombosis in elderly medical in-patients by a low molecular weight heparin: a randomized double-blind trial. Haemostasis 1986; 16: 159-164.
  • 39 Ageno W, Agnelli G, Imberti D. et al MASTER Investigators. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism in the elderly: results of the MASTER Registry. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2008; 19: 663-667.
  • 40 Lloyd NS, Douketis JD, Moinuddin I. et al. Anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized medical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 405-414.
  • 41 Cohen AT, Spiro TE, Büller HR. et al. MAGELLAN Investigators. Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 513-523.
  • 42 Donahue RMJ. Confirmatory trials. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2007. .
  • 43 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER); Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Guidance for Industry. E9 Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm073137.pdf Accessed September 25, 2012.
  • 44 Parmar MK, Ungerleider RS, Simon R. Assessing whether to perform a confirmatory randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 1645-1651.