Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22(05): 371-379
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-08-10-0101
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

A pilot in vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and kerf-cut cylinder fixation for ventral fusion of fourth and fifth equine cervical vertebrae

R. Reardon
1   Division of Companion Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
,
R. Bailey
2   School of Engineering and Science, University of West Scotland, Paisley, UK
,
J. Walmsley
3   The Liphook Equine Hospital, Forest Mere, Liphook, Hampshire, UK
,
J. Heller
1   Division of Companion Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
,
C. Lischer
1   Division of Companion Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 15 October 2008

Accepted: 14 March 2009

Publication Date:
18 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Introduction: The mechanical properties of equine cervical vertebrae joined by implants have not yet been reported. Locking compression plates (LCP) may provide a useful alternative system to the commonly used stainless steel kerf-cut cylinders (KCC) currently used for fixation of cervical vertebrae in horses.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to establish a method for biomechanical testing of equine C4-C5 articulations and to compare the biomechanical properties of cadaveric spines stabilised with KCC and LCP.

Methods: Twenty-four equine cadaveric cervical spines were size measured from radio-graphs, and then randomly allocated to four groups. The C4-C5 articulation for each group was treated in the following way: group 1: KCC implanted, group 2: 8-hole 4.5/5.0 LCP implanted, group 3: 11-hole 3.5 LCP implanted and group 4: No implant. The specimens were fixed in resin and tested under four-point bending in ventral flexion until failure. Stiffness, maximum moment to failure and mode of failure were recorded for all specimens. General linear models were performed to analyse associations.

Results: All spines failed at the C4-C5 articulation. Failure however differed between groups with fractures in group 1, screw pull-out in groups 2 and 3, and disarticulation in group 4 being the common failure modes. The stiffness and maximum moment to failure of the KCC and LCP implanted spines were similar. Increasing age was significantly associated with decreasing moment to failure and increasing size was significantly associated with increasing moment to failure and stiffness.

Clinical significance: This study describes a successful technique for examining the bio-mechanical properties of equine cervical vertebrae. The LCP constructs had similar mechanical properties to the KCC which may justify their use in clinical cases.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wagner PC, Bagby GW, Grant BD. et al. Surgical stabilization of the equine cervical spine. Vet Surg 1979; 8: 7-12.
  • 2 Walmsley JP. Surgical treatment of cervical spinal cord compression in horses: a European experience. Equine Vet Educ 2005; 17: 39-43.
  • 3 Wagner PC, Bagby GW, Grant BD. et al. Evaluation of cervical spinal fusion as a treatment in the equine ‘wobbler’ syndrome. Vet Surg 1979; 8: 84-88.
  • 4 Grant BD, Barbee DD, Wagner PC. et al. Long term results of surgery for equine cervical vertebral malformation. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1985; 31: 91-96.
  • 5 Nixon AJ, Stashak TS. Surgical therapy for spinal cord disease in the horse. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 1985; 31: 61-74.
  • 6 Moore BR, Reed SM, Robertson JT. Surgical treatment of cervical stenotic myelopathy in horses: 73 cases (1983–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 108-112.
  • 7 Trostle SS, Grant BD, Bagby GW. et al. Clincial results of kerf cylinder (Seattle Slew Implant) to reduce implant migration and fracture in horses undergoing surgical interbody fusion. Vet Surg 2003; 32: 499
  • 8 Schuette AC. Examination of the equine wobbler syndrome. Vet. Med. Thesis. University of Munich, Muenchen: 2005
  • 9 Dvorak MF, Pitzen T, Zhu Q. et al. Anterior cervical plate fixation: a biomechanical study to evaluate the effects of plate design, endplate preparation, and bone mineral density. Spine 2005; 30: 294-301.
  • 10 McAfee PC. Current concepts review – Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 859-880.
  • 11 Lehmann W, Briem D, Blauth M. et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems. Eur Spine J 2005; 14: 243-249.
  • 12 Reardon RJM, Kummer M, Lischer C. Ventral locking compression plate for treatment of cervical vertebral stenotic myelopathy in a 3 month old Warm-blood foal. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (04) 537-542.
  • 13 Moore BR, Reed SM, Biller DS. et al. Assessment of vertebral canal diameter and bony malformations of the cervical part of the spine in horses with cervical stenotic myelopathy. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 5-13.
  • 14 Grant BD, Schutte AC, Bagby GW. Surgical treatment of developmental diseases of the spinal column. In: Equine Surgery, 3rd ed. Auer JA, Stick JA (eds) Saunders Elsevier 2006: 544-565.
  • 15 Dowling NE. Engineering methods for deformation, fracture and fatigue. In: Mechanical behaviour of materials 3rd ed. Pearson Prentice Hall . 2007: 152-154.
  • 16 R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0. Available from. http://www.R-project.org.
  • 17 Elce YA, Southwood LL, Nutt JN. et al. Ex vivo comparison of a novel tapered-sleeve and traditional full-limb transfixation pin cast for distal radial fracture stabilization in the horse. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 93-97.
  • 18 Fitzpatrick N, Lewis D, Cross A. A biomechanical comparison of external skeletal fixation and plating for the stabilization of ilial osetotomies in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 349-357.
  • 19 Arnott JL, Bailey R, Shields A. et al. An in vitro comparison of a 2.7/3.5mm hybrid plate alone and combined with crossed K-wires for canine pancarpal arthrodesis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 307-311.
  • 20 Glazer PA, Collihou O, Lotz JC. et al. Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine 1996; 21: 1211-1222.
  • 21 Linde F, Sorenson HC. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J Biomech 1993; 10: 1249-1252.
  • 22 Callaghan JP, McGill SM. Frozen storage increases the ultimate compressive load of porcine vertebrae. J Orthop Res 1995; 5: 809-812.
  • 23 Costi JJ, Hearn TC, Fazzalari NL. The effect of hydration on the stiffness of intervertebral discs in an ovine model. Clin Biochem 2002; 6: 446-455.
  • 24 Furst A, Meier D, Michel S. et al. Effect of age on bone mineral density and micro architecture in the radius and tibia of horses: an Xtreme computed tomographic study. BMC Vet Res 2008; 4: 3
  • 25 Richardson JD, Cripps PJ, Lane JG. An evaluation of the accuracy of ageing horses by their dentition: changes of dental morphology with age. Vet Rec 1995; 5: 117-121.