Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27(01): 08-13
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-13-01-0014
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Accuracy evaluation of a two-wire technique for osteotomy positioning in the tibial plateau levelling procedure

N. Woodbridge
1   University of Nottingham, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Nottingham, UK
2   Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK
,
A. Knuchel-Takano
1   University of Nottingham, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Nottingham, UK
2   Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK
,
H. Brissot
3   Pride Veterinary Centre, Derby, Derbyshire, UK
,
P. Nelissen
1   University of Nottingham, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Nottingham, UK
2   Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK
,
M. Bush
1   University of Nottingham, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Nottingham, UK
2   Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK
,
M. Owen
1   University of Nottingham, Department of Small Animal Surgery, Nottingham, UK
2   Dick White Referrals, Station Farm, Cambridgeshire, UK
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 21. Januar 2013

Accepted 20. August 2013

Publikationsdatum:
19. Dezember 2017 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To evaluate a tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) saw blade positioning technique and to retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of the osteotomy position.

Methods: Preoperative and postoperative radiographs of 72 cases that had a TPLO surgery using a two-wire technique were reviewed. Three measurements (A1, B1, C1) were obtained in preoperative planning using a computer template system (Orthoview Vet) which mapped the intended osteotomy position. The postoperative radiographs were analysed to determine the variability of these three measurements (A2, B2, C2) and therefore the accuracy of the osteotomy.

Results: On average the least variable measurement was B2 (5%) followed by C2 (7%) and then A2 (13%). The maximum mean difference between the intended position and achieved position was 1.5 mm.

Clinical significance: Despite there being a significant difference between the intended and the actual position of the osteotomy, the variation between the intended and actual tibial tuberosity width was small (5%). None of the cases suffered a tibial tuberosity fracture, which also supports the clinical value of this technique. Care must be taken to avoid inadvertent cutting of the Kirschner guide wires.

 
  • References

  • 1 Johnson JA, Austin C, Breur GJ. Incidence of canine appendicular musculoskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
  • 2 Piermattei D, Flo G. The Stifle Joint. In: Brinker, Piermattei and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracture Repair. Piermattei D, Flo G. editors. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1997. p. 1997-534.
  • 3 Henderson R, Milton J. The tibial compression mechanism: A diagnostic aid in stifle injuries. J Am Hosp Assoc 1978; 14: 474-479.
  • 4 Slocum B, Slocum TD. Tibial plateau levelling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 777-795.
  • 5 Gatineau M, Dupuis J, Planté J. et al. Retrospective study of 476 tibial plateau levelling osteotomy procedures. Rate of subsequent ‘pivot shift’, meniscal tear and other complications. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 333-341.
  • 6 Pacchiana PD, Gillings SL, Jessen CR. et al. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 2: 184-193.
  • 7 Bergh MS, Rajala-Schultz P, Johnson KA. Risk factors for tibial tuberosity fracture after tibial plateau levelling osteotomy in dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 374-382.
  • 8 Synthes USA. Standard tibial plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) system. For stabilising osteotomies of the canine proximal tibia. Technique guide [document on the internet]. Synthes USA: [cited 12th December 2012]. Available from: https://productlit.synthes.com/prod_support/Product%20Support%20Materials/Technique%20Guides/VET/SUTGTPLOPlateJ6544B.pdf
  • 9 Bell JC, Ness MG. Does use of a jig influence the precision of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy surgery?. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 228-233.
  • 10 Schmerbach KI, Boeltzig CKM. In vitro comparison of tibial plateau levelling osteotomy with and without the use of a tibial plateau levelling jig. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 156-163.
  • 11 Headrick J, Cook J, Helphrey M. et al. A novel radiographic method to facilitate measurement of the tibial plateau angle in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 24-28.
  • 12 Kowaleski MP, Apelt D, Mattoon JS. et al. The effect of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy on cranial tibial subluxation: An in-vitro study. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 332-336.
  • 13 Devine T, Slocum B, Boulay J. et al. TPLO Surgical technique. TPLO Seminar Course documents. 2003. Eugene, OR, USA:
  • 14 Holton LL, Reid J, Scott EM. et al. Development of a behavioural based scale to measure pain in dogs. Vet Rec 2001; 148: 523-531.
  • 15 Burton NJ, Fitzpatrick N, Wallace AM. Evaluation of cut accuracy and cis cortical damage for tibial plateau levelling osteotomy performed with and without aid of a novel saw guide: An in vitro study. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 28-37.