Z Gastroenterol 2019; 57(01): e47
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1677170
3. Metabolism (incl. NAFLD)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Progression of fatty liver disease to steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis is associated with altered Oncostatin M type I and type II receptor expression

P Lederer
1   University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Clinic II, Division of Hepatology, Grombühlstr. 12, 97080 Würzburg
,
M Roderfeld
2   Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Center for Inner Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Gaffkystr. 11, 35392 Gießen
,
DC Kroy
3   University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Medical Clinic III, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074 Aachen
,
E Roeb
2   Justus-Liebig University Gießen, Center for Inner Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Gaffkystr. 11, 35392 Gießen
,
A Geier
1   University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Clinic II, Division of Hepatology, Grombühlstr. 12, 97080 Würzburg
,
HM Hermanns
1   University Hospital Würzburg, Medical Clinic II, Division of Hepatology, Grombühlstr. 12, 97080 Würzburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 January 2019 (online)

 
 

    Background:

    One of the cytokine families most prominently associated with liver inflammation, obesity and metabolic response, is the family of IL-6-type cytokines, in particular IL-6 itself, but also its less well investigated relative oncostatin M (OSM). IL-6 and OSM have been shown to be intimately connected with our body's reaction to physical, metabolic and pathogen-induced stress. Reports over the last two decades have clearly pointed out that these cytokines have anti-inflammatory as well as pro-inflammatory signaling activities which very much depend on the cellular and physiological context in which they are released or the receptors they utilize for signaling. Much attention has been given to IL-6 as well as its mode of action, however, recent studies implicate that OSM is much more strongly involved in disease pathogenesis than anticipated so far. Its physiology, however, is far less well understood.

    Methods:

    Since OSM can signal via two receptor complexes which might have more pro- or anti-inflammatory activities, respectively, we characterized their expression profile in vivo in liver samples from different rodent models of liver inflammation and fibrosis or in vitro in hepatoma cell lines stimulated with different inflammatory cytokines using quantitative real-time PCR, Western blot analysis and flow cytometry.

    Results:

    We found a distinct decrease of components of the type I OSM receptor complex in livers from mice fed different high fat diets, after intraperitoneal injection of pro-inflammatory cytokines or in Abcb4-/- mice. At the same time the type II OSM receptor complex appeared to be strongly upregulated. Similar observations were made in HepG2 cells treated with IL-1β. In vitro experiments carried out with pharmacological inhibitors of various signaling pathways indicated an important role of the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK1/2 in the downregulation process for the type I receptor complex.

    Conclusions:

    Dysregulation of the expression levels of the type I and type II OSM receptor complexes appears to be a conserved feature in the progression of inflammatory liver diseases. Consequently, alterations in OSM receptor levels might be a possible diagnostic marker for the assessment of progressive liver inflammation.


    #