Nuklearmedizin 2019; 58(02): 150-151
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1683607
Poster
PET und SPECT: Prostata-Karzinom
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Image quality and lesion detectability using different simulated activities of 68Ga-PSMA-11

I Rauscher
1   München
,
WP Fendler
2   Essen
,
T Hope
3   San Francisco
,
A Quon
4   Los Angeles
,
SG Nekolla
1   München
,
K Herrmann
2   Essen
,
WA Weber
1   München
,
J Czernin
4   Los Angeles
,
M Eiber
1   München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 March 2019 (online)

 
 

    Ziel/Aim:

    To evaluate the feasibility of reducing administered tracer activities for 68Ga-PSMA11 below the recommended range in the EANM/SNMMI procedure guideline (1.8 – 2.2 MBq/kgBW) maintaining high image quality.

    Methodik/Methods:

    68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was performed in eleven prostate cancer (PC) patients. PET data were acquired in list-mode (3 min per bed position) and reconstructed using the 3 min full acquisition, 2 min and 1 min to generate 3/3, 2/3 and 1/3 of injected activities referenced as standard dose (1.9 ± 0.1 MBq/kgBW), low-dose (1.3 ± 0.1 MBq/kgBW) and very-low dose (0.6 ± 0.0 MBq/kgBW). Overall image quality was assessed on a five-point-scale and detectability of focal PSMA-positive lesions were compared to reference standard by three readers.

    Ergebnisse/Results:

    Subjective image quality declined with computational decreasing simulated tracer activities (mean score standard dose: 4.1 ± 0.4, low-dose: 3.4 ± 0.7, very low-dose: 1.9 ± 0.4, respectively). Mean scores for image quality were statistically significant different between the three activity groups. In total, 21 lesions suggestive for PC were present and correctly identified in 100%, 100% and 95% on standard dose, in 95%, 81% and 90% on low-dose and in 71%, 76% and 59% on very low-dose images, for reader 1, reader 2 and reader 3 respectively.

    Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions:

    Reduction of 68Ga-PSMA-11 activities below the recommended range in the EANM/SNMI procedure guideline is not feasible without substantial negative impact on image quality and lesion detectability.


    #