CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Laryngorhinootologie 2020; 99(S 02): S259
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1711095
Abstracts
Otology

The influence of cochlear morphology on deeply insertion in straight and perimodiolar electrode arrays

A Geisler
1   Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Freiburg
,
MC Ketterer
1   Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Freiburg
,
A Aschendorff
1   Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Freiburg
,
S Arndt
1   Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Freiburg
,
R Beck
1   Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Objective The aim of this study is to examine the impact of cochlear morphology on deeply inserted electrode arrays and the angular depth of the first basal electrode artifact in perimodiolar and straight electrode arrays.

    Methods We retrospectively analyzed 548 patients implanted between 2013 and 2018 with a Cochlear™ Contour Advance®, Cochlear™ slim straight® or Cochlear™ slim modiolar® electrode array and MED EL FlexSoft, MED EL FlexEAS, MED EL Flex24 and MED EL Flex28. We measured distance A and B, established by Escudé et al. (2006), angular insertion depth of the first basal and of the apical electrode artifact by rotational tomography.

    Results The straight electrode arrays FlexSoft with a length of 31.5mm and the Flex28 with 28mm reached the highest angular insertion depth measured by the apical electrode artifact. Furthermore, they exhibited a significant increased angular insertion depth of the basal electrode artifact compared to the other included electrode arrays. We could not find a relevant correlation between cochlear morphology measurements and neither the insertion depth of the first basal nor the apical electrode artifact.

    Conclusion Straight electrode arrays with the longest length (FlexSoft and Flex28) reached not only the deepest angular insertion depth for the apical, but also for the basal electrode artifact. Cochlear morphology has no relevant influence on deeply insertion of the basal electrode, but on the apical insertion angle itself. Therefore, electrode array design is decisive of apical and basal angular insertion depth.


    #
    Dr.med. Geisler Antje
    Universitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde
    Killianstr.5
    79106 Freiburg

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    10 June 2020

    © 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Stuttgart · New York