Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69(S 01): S1-S85
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1725625
Oral Presentations
Saturday, February 27
Koronare Herzerkrankung

Rethinking Surgical NSTEMI Treatment

D. Qaiyumi
1   Berlin, Deutschland
,
S. Sima
1   Berlin, Deutschland
,
H. Grubitzsch
1   Berlin, Deutschland
,
V. Falk
1   Berlin, Deutschland
,
S. H. Sündermann
1   Berlin, Deutschland
,
T. Christ
1   Berlin, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
 

    Objectives: For patients with a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), guideline recommendations regularly fall short in regard to adequate risk-assessed time management until coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Overall, 5 to 10% of all NSTEMI patients ultimately require revascularization surgery, with guidelines suggesting an individual approach especially in nonemergent NSTEMI patients. Considering these cohorts high-risk characteristics, a more patient-tailored and risk-stratified approach is crucial. As such, this study aimed to investigate the risk-assessed optimal timing from NSTEMI onset until CABG in NSTEMI patients.

    Methods: We conducted a comprehensive single-center, retrospective, observational study of 485 NSTEMI patients undergoing isolated CABG between 2016 and 2020. Our study cohort was divided into three groups by time from NSTEMI onset until surgical revascularization; group 1 (<48 h, n = 138); group 2 (48–72 h, n = 205), and group 3 (>7 d, n = 155). Investigated were in-hospital morbidity and mortality.

    Result: Overall, group 1 had considerably more critical patients (elevated cardiac markers (p = 0.001), cardiogenic shock (p < 0.001), intubation (p = 0.006), left main disease (LMD) (p = 0.012), and reduced left ventricular function (LVEF) (p = 0.063) resulting in a higher EuroSCORE II (p = 0.001). Baseline characteristics and procedural data did not differ significantly among the three groups. Total in-hospital mortality was 7.5% (n = 38), 14.4% (n = 20) for group 1, 4.9% (n = 10) for group 2, and 4.9% (n = 8) for group 3, respectively. In-hospital mortality for critical patients was 14% (n = 18), and for noncritical patients it was 3.7% (n = 13). Especially early revascularization of critical patients with reduced LVEF showed a strong association to in-hospital mortality. When excluding critical patients, in-hospital mortality did not vary significantly between groups. Furthermore, early CABG was associated with a higher incidence in platelet (p < 0.001) and erythrocyte (p < 0.015) transfusion, regardless of critical or noncritical status.

    Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that in-hospital mortality in noncritical patients presenting with NSTEMI is unattached to timing of revascularization. Revascularization of critical patients is associated with a higher mortality. Especially patients with impaired left ventricular function seem to be at risk when revascularized earlier.


    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    19 February 2021

    © 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany