Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27(1): 086-097
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1270421
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Facial Rejuvenation and Volumization Using Implants

William J. Binder1
  • 1Division of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Beverly Hills, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

Whereas traditional concepts of facial aging focus on the descent of soft tissue secondary to gravitational effects, it is now well established that volumetric changes involving different levels of soft tissue loss reveal craniofacial skeletal deficiencies that, together, contribute to the changes evident in the aging face. Thus, effective facial rejuvenation requires a comprehensive paradigm that identifies and addresses all anatomic elements involved in the aging process. Contemporary practices in facial rejuvenation have expanded far beyond the rhytidectomy procedure to involve deeper and more fundamental levels of dissection for the purpose of elevating and replacing volume. Alloplastic implants offer a long-term, multidimensional solution to facial rejuvenation by concomitantly augmenting skeletal deficiency, restoring lost soft tissue volume, and smoothing irregularities in the facial contour. Facial augmentation using implants represents a straightforward, simple procedure with minimal risks and long-lasting benefits. By applying accurate and judicious techniques for preoperative analysis, selecting the appropriate implant, and with correct surgical placement of the implants, the facial plastic surgeon can achieve successful facial volumization and restore the youthful appearance of the aging patient.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Matros E, Momoh A, Yaremchuk M J. The aging midfacial skeleton: implications for rejuvenation and reconstruction using implants.  Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  25 252-259
  • 2 Binder W, Kim B, Azizzadeh B. Aesthetic midface implants. In: Azizzadeh B, Murphy M, Johnson C Master Techniques in Facial Rejuvenation. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders-Elsevier Medical Publishers; 2006: 197-215
  • 3 Hopping S B, Joshi A S, Tanna N, Janjanin S. Volumetric facelift: evaluation of rhytidectomy with alloplastic augmentation.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010;  119 174-180
  • 4 Quatela V C, Marotta J C. Pitfalls of midface surgery.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;  13 401-409
  • 5 Psillakis J M, Rumley T O, Camargos A. Subperiosteal approach as an improved concept for correction of the aging face.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 383-394
  • 6 Tessier P. [Subperiosteal face-lift].  Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;  34 193-197
  • 7 Ramirez O M. The subperiosteal rhytidectomy: the third-generation face-lift.  Ann Plast Surg. 1992;  28 218-232 discussion 233-234
  • 8 Hamra S T. The deep-plane rhytidectomy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;  86 53-61 discussion 62-63
  • 9 Kamer F M. One hundred consecutive deep plane face-lifts.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;  122 17-22
  • 10 Chajchir A, Benzaquen I. Liposuction fat grafts in face wrinkles and hemifacial atrophy.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1986;  10 115-117
  • 11 Niamtu III J. Essentials of cheek and midface implants.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;  68 1420-1429
  • 12 Broadbent T R, Mathews V L. Artistic relationships in surface anatomy of the face: application to reconstructive surgery.  Plast Reconstr Surg (1946). 1957;  20 1-17
  • 13 Flowers R S. Cosmetic blepharoplasty, state of the art. In: Advances in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Vol. 8. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book Inc.; 1992: 31
  • 14 Carr A, Samaras K, Burton S et al.. A syndrome of peripheral lipodystrophy, hyperlipidaemia and insulin resistance in patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors.  AIDS. 1998;  12 F51-F58
  • 15 Kotler D P, Rosenbaum K, Wang J, Pierson R N. Studies of body composition and fat distribution in HIV-infected and control subjects.  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1999;  20 228-237
  • 16 Binder W J, Bloom D C. The use of custom-designed midfacial and submalar implants in the treatment of facial wasting syndrome.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;  6 394-397
  • 17 Romm S. Art, love, and facial beauty.  Clin Plast Surg. 1987;  14 579-583
  • 18 Wilkinson T S. Complications in aesthetic malar augmentation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;  71 643-649
  • 19 Silver W E. The use of alloplast material in contouring the face.  Facial Plast Surg. 1986;  3 81-98
  • 20 Whitaker L A. Aesthetic augmentation of the malar-midface structures.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;  80 337-346
  • 21 Prendergast M, Schoenrock L D. Malar augmentation. Patient classification and placement.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;  115 964-969
  • 22 Binder W J. Submalar augmentation. An alternative to face-lift surgery.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;  115 797-801
  • 23 Terino E O. Alloplastic facial contouring by zonal principles of skeletal anatomy.  Clin Plast Surg. 1992;  19 487-510
  • 24 Binder W J. A comprehensive approach for aesthetic contouring of the midface in rhytidectomy.  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1993;  1 231-255
  • 25 Rubin J P, Yaremchuk M J. Complications and toxicities of implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive and aesthetic surgery: a comprehensive review of the literature.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 1336-1353

William J BinderM.D. F.A.C.S. 

120 S. Spalding Drive, S. 340

Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Email: wjbmd8@aol.com

    >