A Vascular Malformation Presenting as a Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor

Abstract We present the case of a venous malformation (VM) masquerading as a schwannoma. VMs are thin-walled vascular dilations of various sizes that typically present as soft, compressible, blue masses that are associated with pain or dysesthesia. VMs are commonly found in the head and neck as well as the distal extremities. Notably, slow-flow VMs are hypointense on T1-weighted imaging, hyperintense on T2-weighted imaging, and enhance markedly with contrast. However, VMs tend to be poorly circumscribed and fraught with venous lakes and phleboliths. Conservative therapy and sclerotherapy are the primary treatment options. In this case report, we present a VM presenting near the neurovascular bundle of the upper extremity axilla. Our case is unique in that the patient presented with symptoms and imaging qualities characteristic for a peripheral nerve schwannoma.

approximately 1%. 1,2 Though all are present at birth, the most rapid growth occurs during puberty, and they continue to grow throughout life; only 50% are identified at birth. 3 In this respect, they differ from hemangiomas.VMs can appear superficial, deep, diffuse, localized, or, rarely, as multiple lesions.They can occur in any tissue in the body.The most common locations reported are in the head and neck (40%), followed by the extremities (40%) and trunk (20%). 4Patients with VMs present as soft, blue masses that are compressible; the most common complaint is pain.
Proper workup for underlying coagulopathy must follow a diagnosis of VM.Various genetic syndromes, such as Kassabach-Merritt syndrome, Servelle-Martorell syndrome, Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome, and Parkes Weber syndrome, have been associated with vascular malformations among other pathologies and must be excluded.
MRI has become the modality of choice for imaging VMs.Slow-flow VMs are typically hypointense on T1-weighted imaging, have bright signal intensity on T2, and enhance markedly with contrast. 5Very often, large VMs have obvious phleboliths (dark circular areas) and poorly defined venous lakes on T2 imaging.
Indications for treatment for VMs primarily include pain and functional impairment, or are cosmesis related.Elastic therapy, sclerotherapy, and surgical resection are the potential therapeutic options.Elastic compression stockings have been shown to limit the swelling and improve coagulopathy. 6In fact, in one series of 121 successfully treated VMs, 8% had no treatment and 24% had aspirin and compression garments. 3Sclerotherapy, on the other hand, is the mainstay treatment for diffuse VMs that involve multiple muscle groups; sclerotherapy injection of absolute ethanol induces inflammation and obliteration of affected veins.Injections are usually bimonthly until the malformations shrink.Success rate in the largest series of 87 patients treated with an average of three sessions over 8 months was 95%; another series reports a success rate of 76%. 7,8Complications reported include blistering, full-thickness cutaneous necrosis, and nerve injury. 7Surgical resection is reserved for VMs localized to single muscle or muscle group or causing neurologic impairment.In the Enjolras et al series, 6 of 11 upper extremity VMs were treated with surgical skin excision with or without muscle excision.Outcomes were reported as bad (1/6), unchanged (2/6), mediocre (1/6), and improved (2/6). 6he focus we would like to draw in this article, however, is a comparison with peripheral nerve schwannomas (PNSs).Of note, PNSs also present with a palpable mass (96%) often associated with referred dysesthesia (95%) and similarly, on MRI sequencing, are isotense or hypointense to muscle on T1 and hyperintense on T2. 8They also vividly enhance with contrast.Typically, intramuscular VMs can be differentiated from PNSs based on poorly circumscribed venous lakes and phleboliths.Simon et al demonstrated that high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) correctly differentiated tumor and motor fascicles when compared with intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring. 9Differentiating between PNS and VM with HRUS is difficult as blood can often be stagnant in slow-flow VMs.However, Zardi et al demonstrate the benefit of power flow sonography in identifying "red" and "blue" vascular signal spots that indicate vascularity which is present in PNSs but absent in VMs. 9 Likewise, VMs will demonstrate compressibility given even light pressure from a US scanner head, whereas PNS are not compressible with scanner head pressure.MRI with tractography demonstrated good correspondence with both HRUS and intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring. 10This may be useful for differentiating PNS and VM.
Primary treatment for a PNS is complete surgical resection, whereas that for a VM is conservative therapy with or without sclerotherapy. 11As peripheral nerve surgeons who have limited exposure to peripheral vascular anomalies, we must be wary of a slow-flowing VM in our differential for an upper extremity schwannoma.We recommend being cognizant to the physical exam and minute details in MRI, differences of which are demonstrated in ►Table 1.Alternatively, a trial of conservative compressive therapy with aspirin for a few weeks for suspicious masses may elucidate this differential.However, we do not recommend this approach as aspirin may postpone surgery and, more importantly, painful, peripheral masses could very well be a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, which mandate early resection.

Fig. 3 (
Fig.3 (A)The excised tissue consists entirely of small-medium-sized thinned-wall vascular channels containing red blood cells.(B) Magnified view demonstrates no prominent cellular atypia, necrosis, and/or mitoses.Nervous tissue is also not present.

Table 1
MRI and physical exam differences between PNS and VM Abbreviation: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.