Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 08(4): 269-285
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-861575
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Imaging of Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Ali Guermazi1 , 2 , Bachir Taouli2 , John A. Lynch2 , Charles G. Peterfy1
  • 1Synarc Inc., San Francisco, California
  • 2Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 January 2005 (online)

ABSTRACT

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis, with a prevalence of 1% in the United States. Recently introduced disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs have been extremely successful in preventing irreversible joint damage, particularly if initiated early. Accordingly, accurate and early diagnosis of RA has become imperative. This shift places increased demands on imaging to identify even the slightest traces of erosive joint damage and predict future structural and functional deterioration. Unfortunately, conventional radiography has been shown to be insensitive for bone erosions, particularly in early stages of the disease. Computed tomography (CT) is rarely used, but its tomographic perspective offers advantages over projectional radiography. Ultrasound (US) detects more erosions than radiography does and also can evaluate synovitis. Scintigraphy also can detect inflammation and bone turnover at sites of active erosion. It lacks spatial resolution but offers greater anatomical coverage, making whole-body assessments possible. Of all imaging modalities, however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows the greatest sensitivity for detecting and monitoring bone erosions and also can detect and follow pre-erosive features of RA, such as synovitis, bone marrow edema or osteitis, and tendinous and ligamentous abnormalities. In this article, we review the appearance of bone erosions on conventional radiography and alternative imaging modalities including MRI, CT, US, and scintigraphy. We also review alternative acquisition techniques for MRI in RA and discuss the utility of fat suppression and contrast enhancement.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Jones G, Halbert J, Crotty M et al.. The effect of treatment on radiological progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003;  42 6-13
  • 2 Gasson J, Gandy S J, Hutton C W et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis in metacarpophalangeal joints.  Skeletal Radiol. 2000;  29 324-334
  • 3 Genant H K, Jiang Y, Peterfy C et al.. Assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a modified scoring method on digitized and original radiographs.  Arthritis Rheum. 1998;  41 1583-1590
  • 4 Giovagnoni A, Valeri G, Burroni E, Amici F. Rheumatoid arthritis: follow-up and response to treatment.  Eur J Radiol. 1998;  27(Suppl 1) S25-S30
  • 5 Sharp J T. Radiologic assessment as an outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 1989;  32 221-229
  • 6 Sharp J T. Scoring radiographic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis.  Radiol Clin North Am. 1996;  34 233-241x
  • 7 Sharp J T, Young D Y, Bluhm G B et al.. How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?.  Arthritis Rheum. 1985;  28 1326-1335
  • 8 Sharp J T, Bluhm G B, Brook A et al.. Reproducibility of multiple-observer scoring of radiologic abnormalities in the hands and wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 1985;  28 16-24
  • 9 Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Gideon P et al.. Wrist and finger joint MR imaging in rheumatoid arthritis.  Acta Radiol. 1999;  40 400-409
  • 10 Wakefield R J, Gibbon W W, Conaghan P G et al.. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography.  Arthritis Rheum. 2000;  43 2762-2770
  • 11 Genant H K. Methods of assessing radiographic change in rheumatoid arthritis.  Am J Med. 1983;  75 35-47
  • 12 De Smet A A, Goin J E, Arnett G R et al.. Comparison of two detail screen-film systems using a rheumatoid erosion model.  Invest Radiol. 1983;  18 359-363
  • 13 van der Heijde D M. Radiographic imaging: the “gold standard” for assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;  39(Suppl 1) 9-16
  • 14 Buckland-Wright J C. Microfocal radiographic examination of erosions in the wrist and hand of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;  43 160-171
  • 15 McGonagle D, Conaghan P G, Wakefield R, Emery P. Imaging the joints in early rheumatoid arthritis.  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2001;  15 91-104
  • 16 Gilkeson G, Polisson R, Sinclair H et al.. Early detection of carpal erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot study of magnetic resonance imaging.  J Rheumatol. 1988;  15 1361-1366
  • 17 Buckland-Wright J C, Clarke G S, Walker S R. Erosion number and area progression in the wrists and hands of rheumatoid patients: a quantitative microfocal radiographic study.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;  48 25-29
  • 18 Rau R, Wassenberg S, Herborn G et al.. Identification of radiologic healing phenomena in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.  J Rheumatol. 2001;  28 2608-2615
  • 19 Sharp J T, Van Der Heijde D, Boers M et al.. Repair of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis does occur. Results from 2 studies by the OMERACT Subcommittee on Healing of Erosions.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1102-1107
  • 20 Van Der Heijde D, Sharp J T, Rau R, Strand V. OMERACT Workshop: repair of structural damage in rheumatoid arthritis.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1108-1109
  • 21 Brower A C. Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The gold standard versus fool's gold.  Arthritis Rheum. 1990;  33 316-324
  • 22 Brower A C. Radiographic assessment of disease progression in rheumatoid arthritis.  Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1991;  17 471-485
  • 23 Devauchelle Pensec V, Saraux A, Berthelot J M et al.. Ability of hand radiographs to predict a further diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with early arthritis.  J Rheumatol. 2001;  28 2603-2607
  • 24 Ostergaard M, Gideon P, Sorensen K et al.. Scoring of synovial membrane hypertrophy and bone erosions by MR imaging in clinically active and inactive rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist.  Scand J Rheumatol. 1995;  24 212-218
  • 25 Backhaus M, Burmester G R, Sandrock D et al.. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;  61 895-904
  • 26 McGonagle D, Conaghan P G, O'Connor P et al.. The relationship between synovitis and bone changes in early untreated rheumatoid arthritis: a controlled magnetic resonance imaging study.  Arthritis Rheum. 1999;  42 1706-1711
  • 27 Conaghan P G, Quinn M A, O'Connor P et al.. Can very high-dose anti-tumor necrosis factor blockade at onset of rheumatoid arthritis produce long-term remission?.  Arthritis Rheum. 2002;  46 1971-1972 , author reply 1973
  • 28 Lassere M N, Bird P. Measurement of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity and damage using magnetic resonance imaging. Truth and discrimination: does MRI make the grade?.  J Rheumatol. 2001;  28 1151-1157
  • 29 McQueen F M, Benton N, Crabbe J et al.. What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;  60 859-868
  • 30 Karim Z, Wakefield R J, Conaghan P G et al.. The impact of ultrasonography on diagnosis and management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions.  Arthritis Rheum. 2001;  44 2932-2933
  • 31 Conaghan P G, McGonagle D, Wakefield R, Emery P. New approaches to imaging of early rheumatoid arthritis.  Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999;  17(6 Suppl 18) S37-S42
  • 32 Backhaus M, Burmester G R, Gerber T et al.. Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;  60 641-649
  • 33 Alarcon G S, Lopez-Ben R, Moreland L W. High-resolution ultrasound for the study of target joints in rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 2002;  46 1969-1970 , author reply 1970-1971
  • 34 Weidekamm C, Koller M, Weber M, Kainberger F. Diagnostic value of high-resolution B-mode and Doppler sonography for imaging of hand and finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 2003;  48 325-333
  • 35 Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A et al.. Ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone erosions.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;  60 98-103
  • 36 Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D et al.. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.  Arthritis Rheum. 1999;  42 1232-1245
  • 37 Roben P, Barkmann R, Ullrich S et al.. Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;  60 670-677
  • 38 Mc Gonagle D, Gibbon W, O'Connor P et al.. A preliminary study of ultrasound aspiration of bone erosion in early rheumatoid arthritis.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999;  38 329-331
  • 39 Ostergaard M, Szkudlarek M. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis-why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored.  Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;  32 63-73
  • 40 McQueen F, Lassere M, Edmonds J et al.. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Summary of OMERACT 6 MR Imaging Module.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1387-1392
  • 41 Voog U, Alstergren P, Eliasson S et al.. Inflammatory mediators and radiographic changes in temporomandibular joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.  Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;  61 57-64
  • 42 Alasaarela E, Suramo I, Tervonen O et al.. Evaluation of humeral head erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and plain radiography.  Br J Rheumatol. 1998;  37 1152-1156
  • 43 Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Jensen K E et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis. The TIRA Group.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;  59 521-528
  • 44 McQueen F M, Stewart N, Crabbe J et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals a high prevalence of erosions at four months after symptom onset.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;  57 350-356
  • 45 Peterfy C G. New developments in imaging in rheumatoid arthritis.  Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;  15 288-295
  • 46 Rominger M B, Bernreuter W K, Kenney P J et al.. MR imaging of the hands in early rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results.  Radiographics. 1993;  13 37-46
  • 47 Foley-Nolan D, Stack J P, Ryan M et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis-a comparison with plain film radiographs.  Br J Rheumatol. 1991;  30 101-106
  • 48 Ostendorf B, Peters R, Dann P et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging and miniarthroscopy of metacarpophalangeal joints: sensitive detection of morphologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 2001;  44 2492-2502
  • 49 Ostergaard M, Hansen M, Stoltenberg M et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.  Arthritis Rheum. 1999;  42 918-929
  • 50 Cimmino M A, Bountis C, Silvestri E et al.. An appraisal of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.  Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;  30 180-195
  • 51 McQueen F M, Stewart N, Crabbe J et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;  58 156-163
  • 52 Peterfy C G. Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis: the evolution of clinical applications through clinical trials.  Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2001;  30 375-396
  • 53 Peterfy C G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis.  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;  5 275-288
  • 54 Stewart N R, McQueen F M, Crabbe J P. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis: a pictorial essay.  Australas Radiol. 2001;  45 268-273
  • 55 Peterfy C G. Magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: current status and future directions.  J Rheumatol. 2001;  28 1134-1142
  • 56 Savnik A, Malmskov H, Thomsen H S et al.. MRI of the wrist and finger joints in inflammatory joint diseases at 1-year interval: MRI features to predict bone erosions.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 1203-1210
  • 57 Huang J, Stewart N, Crabbe J et al.. A 1-year follow-up study of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals synovitis to be increased in shared epitope-positive patients and predictive of erosions at 1 year.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;  39 407-416
  • 58 Lee D M, Weinblatt M E. Rheumatoid arthritis.  Lancet. 2001;  358 903-911
  • 59 Kirwan J R. The relationship between synovitis and erosions in rheumatoid arthritis.  Br J Rheumatol. 1997;  36 225-228
  • 60 Ostergaard M, Klarlund M, Lassere M et al.. Interreader agreement in the assessment of magnetic resonance images of rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints-an international multicenter study.  J Rheumatol. 2001;  28 1143-1150
  • 61 Lassere M, McQueen F, Ostergaard M et al.. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 3: an international multicenter reliability study using the RA-MRI score.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1366-1375
  • 62 Peterfy C, Edmonds J, Lassere M et al.. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Studies Module.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1364-1365
  • 63 Bird P, Ejbjerg B, McQueen F et al.. OMERACT Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Exercise 5: an international multicenter reliability study using computerized MRI erosion volume measurements.  J Rheumatol. 2003;  30 1380-1384
  • 64 Ostrowitzki S, Redei J, Lynch J A et al.. Use of multispectral MRI analysis to quantify erosive changes in the hands of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a short-term and a long-term longitudinal study.  Arthritis Rheum. 2004;  50 716-724
  • 65 Tonolli-Serabian I, Poet J L, Dufour M et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with other inflammatory joint diseases and control subjects.  Clin Rheumatol. 1996;  15 137-142
  • 66 Savnik A, Malmskov H, Thomsen H S et al.. MRI of the arthritic small joints: comparison of extremity MRI (0.2 T) vs high-field MRI (1.5 T).  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 1030-1038
  • 67 McQueen F M. Magnetic resonance imaging in early inflammatory arthritis: what is its role?.  Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;  39 700-706
  • 68 Lindegaard H, Vallo J, Horslev-Petersen K et al.. Low field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in untreated rheumatoid arthritis of recent onset.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;  60 770-776
  • 69 Weissman B N. Imaging techniques in rheumatoid arthritis.  J Rheumatol Suppl. 1994;  42 14-19
  • 70 Mottonen T T, Hannonen P, Toivanen J et al.. Value of joint scintigraphy in the prediction of erosiveness in early rheumatoid arthritis.  Ann Rheum Dis. 1988;  47 183-189

Ali GuermaziM.D. 

Synarc, Inc., 575 Market Street, 17th Floor

San Francisco, CA, 94105

    >