Future Directions in Facial Rejuvenation

Noëlle S. Sherber; Ariel N. Rad

doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363764

Facial Plastic Surgery, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Facial Plast Surg 2014; 30(01): 072-075
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363764

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Future Directions in Facial Rejuvenation

Autoren

Noëlle S. Sherber

¹Sherber + Rad, Northwest, Washington, District of Columbia
Ariel N. Rad

¹Sherber + Rad, Northwest, Washington, District of Columbia

²Department of Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

Future directions in the advancement and refinement of facial rejuvenation techniques represent a response to patient demand for higher aesthetic impact with less procedural downtime and with minimal scarring as evidence of previous surgery. With surgical procedures, the trend of innovation in response to demand has been toward more minimally invasive approaches that have the predictability and durability of results of more traditional approaches. With nonsurgical procedures, there have been new developments in achieving more significant aesthetic improvements with less downtime and less invasively.

Keywords

facelift - minimally invasive - facial rejuvenation - scar treatment - revolumizing

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Alpert BS, Baker DC, Hamra ST, Owsley JQ, Ramirez O. Identical twin face lifts with differing techniques: a 10-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (3) 1025-1033 , discussion 1034–1036
2 Graham DW, Heller J, Kurkjian TJ, Schaub TS, Rohrich RJ. Brow lift in facial rejuvenation: a systematic literature review of open versus endoscopic techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (4) 335e-341e
3 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic full facelift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994; 18 (4) 363-371
4 Abramo AC. Full facelift through an endoscopic approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996; 20 (1) 59-64
5 Citarella ER, Sterodimas A, Condé-Green A. Endoscopically assisted limited-incision rhytidectomy: a 10-year prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (11) 1842-1848
6 Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 58 (1) 80-88
7 Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (4) 569-603 , vi–vii
8 Little JW. Three-dimensional rejuvenation of the midface: volumetric resculpture by malar imbrication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (1) 267-285 , discussion 286–289
9 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy, plication and short scar facelifts: indications and techniques. Clin Plast Surg 2008; 35 (4) 533-550 , vi
10 Patrocinio LG, Patrocinio TG, Patrocinio JA. Subperiosteal midface-lift. Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29 (3) 206-213
11 Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (3, Suppl) 108S-120S
12 Coleman III WP. Autologous fat transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (4) 736
13 Niechajev I, Sevćuk O. Long-term results of fat transplantation: clinical and histologic studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94 (3) 496-506
14 Pu LL, Coleman SR, Cui X, Ferguson Jr RE, Vasconez HC. Autologous fat grafts harvested and refined by the Coleman technique: a comparative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122 (3) 932-937
15 Kim JH, Jung M, Kim HS, Kim YM, Choi EH. Adipose-derived stem cells as a new therapeutic modality for ageing skin. Exp Dermatol 2011; 20 (5) 383-387
16 ASAPS/ASPS position statement on stem cells and fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 2011; 31 (6) 716-717
17 Eaves III FF, Haeck PC, Rohrich RJ. ASAPS/ASPS Position statement on stem cells and fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (1) 285-287
18 Gir P, Oni G, Brown SA, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. Human adipose stem cells: current clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (6) 1277-1290
19 C+B 1927-nm and SkinCeuticals clinical study, final phase II results. clear+brilliant.com Web site. http://www.clearandbrilliant.com/sites/default/files/1927_SkinC_Phase_II_Final_Results_with_Photos_5Mar12.pdf . Accessed January 2, 2014
20 Oni G, Brown SA, Kenkel JM. Can fractional lasers enhance transdermal absorption of topical lidocaine in an in vivo animal model?. Lasers Surg Med 2012; 44 (2) 168-174
21 Alster TS, Nanni CA. Pulsed dye laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (6) 2190-2195
22 Tanzi EL, Lupton JR, Alster TS. Lasers in dermatology: four decades of progress. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49 (1) 1-31 , quiz 31–34
23 Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Wang FS , et al. Flashlamp pulsed dye laser (PDL) suppression of keloid proliferation through down-regulation of TGF-beta1 expression and extracellular matrix expression. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34 (2) 104-108
24 McCraw JB, McCraw JA, McMellin A, Bettencourt N. Prevention of unfavorable scars using early pulse dye laser treatments: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42 (1) 7-14
25 Conologue TD, Norwood C. Treatment of surgical scars with the cryogen-cooled 595 nm pulsed dye laser starting on the day of suture removal. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32 (1) 13-20
26 Alster TS, Tanzi EL, Lazarus M. The use of fractional laser photothermolysis for the treatment of atrophic scars. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (3) 295-299
27 Tierney E, Mahmoud BH, Srivastava D, Ozog D, Kouba DJ. Treatment of surgical scars with nonablative fractional laser versus pulsed dye laser: a randomized controlled trial. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (8) 1172-1180
28 Waibel JS, Wulkan AJ, Shumaker PR. Treatment of hypertrophic scars using laser and laser assisted corticosteroid delivery. Lasers Surg Med 2013; 45 (3) 135-140
29 Lee SH, Zheng Z, Roh MR. Early postoperative treatment of surgical scars using a fractional carbon dioxide laser: a split-scar, evaluator-blinded study. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39 (8) 1190-1196
30 Ziade M, Domergue S, Batifol D , et al. Use of botulinum toxin type A to improve treatment of facial wounds: a prospective randomised study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (2) 209-214