Download PDF
Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2005; 02(02): 91-98
DOI: 10.1016/S0973-0508(05)80021-8
Review Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Indications and need for neuroimaging and newer developments in brain imaging in mild head injury

N. Muthukumar
Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 April 2017 (online)

  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Mild head injury (MHI) accounts for over 80% of hospital attendance due to head injury. However, there is no consensus in the evaluation and management of patients with MHI. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the indications and need for neuroimaging in MHI as well as the evolving role of newer imaging modalities in the evaluation and management of MHI. The current evidence in the literature does not support the routine use of plain radiography of the skull in the evaluation of patients with MHI. The prevalence of intracranial lesions in MHI varies from 5% in GCS 15 to 40% in GCS 13. Several groups have proposed various guidelines for the evaluation and management of MHI patients. These include: NICE guidelines, New Orleans CT head rule, Canadian CT Head rule, Italian Guidelines, Scandinavian Guidelines, EFNS (European Federation of Neurosurgical Societies) guidelines, and WHO guidelines. Most of these guidelines are applicable only to adult patients. Separate guidelines have been provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics for children less than 2 years of age and for those between 2 and 20 years of age. However, recent studies have shown that none of these guidelines have 100% sensitivity. Therefore, physicians who use these guidelines should be aware of the small risk of missing intracranial lesions in patients with MHI. Newer imaging modalities like newer MR sequences, MR spectroscopy, Magnetic Source Imaging (MSI), PET, and SPECT have provided objective evidence of structural and functional alterations in patients with MHI even when CT and routine MR sequences do not reveal abnormalities. Thus, these imaging techniques have been shown to have a role in the evaluation of patients with persistent post-concussive symptoms and they have provided proof of organic basis for these symptoms.

Keywords

Computed tomography - Glasgow Coma Scale - Magnetic resonance imaging - mild head injury - minor head injury - PET - SPECT
 

  • References

  • 1 Jennett B. Epidemiology of head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Pscyhiat 60 1996; 362-369
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kraus JF, McArthur DL, Silverman TA, Jayaraman M. Epidemiology of brain injury. 1996. Neurotrauma McGraw Hill; New York: 13-30
    Google Scholar
  • 3 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M. Mild head injury — mortality and complication rate: meta-analysis of findings in a systematic literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145 2003; 843-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Klauber MR, Marshall LF, Luerssen TG. et al Determinants of head injury mortality: importance of the low risk patient. Neurosurgery 24 1989; 31-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Teasdale GM, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 02 1974; 81-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Williams DH, Levin HS, Eisenberg HM. Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery 27 1990; 422-488
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gomez PA, Lobato RD, Ortega JM, De La Cruz J. Mild head injury: Differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. Br J Neurosurg 10 1996; 453-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Haydel MJ, Preston CA, Mills TJ. et al Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med 343 2000; 100-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Steill IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K. et al The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 357 2001; 1391-1396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Borg J, Holm L, Cassidy DJ. et al Diagnostic procedures in mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO collaborating center task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehab Med 43 2004; 61-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 The Study Group on Head Injury of the Italian Society for Neurosurgery. Guidelines for minor head injury patients’ management in adult age. J Neurosurg Sci 40 1996; 11-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Mendelow AD, Teasdale GM, Jennett B. et al Risks of intracranial haematoma in head injured adults. Br Med J Clin Res Ed 287 1983; 1173-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Masters SJ, McClean PM, Arcarese JS. et al Skull x-ray examinations after head trauma. Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study. N Engl J Med 316 1987; 84-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Teasdale GM, Murray G, Anderson E. et al implications for managing head injuries. Br Med J 300 1990; 363-367
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nee PA, hadfield JM, Yates DW, Faragher EB. Significance of vomiting after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 66 1999; 470-473
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Borczuk P. Predictors of intracranial injury in patients with mild head trauma. Ann Emerg Med 25 1995; 731-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hoffman PA, nelemans P, Kemerin GJ, Wilmink JT. Value of radiological diagnosis of skull fracture in the management of mild head injury: meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68 2000; 416-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Thiruppathy SP, Muthukumar N. Mild head injury: revisited. Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 146 2004; 1075-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Thillainayagam K, MacMillan R, Mendelow AD. et al How accurately are fractures of skull diagnosed in an accident and emergency department. Injury 18 1987; 319-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Vos PE, Battistin L, Birbamer G. et al EFNS guideline on mild traumatic brain injury: report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol 09 2002; 207-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Britton M, Borg J, Colliander m et al: Concussion: Observation at hospital or computed tomography and discharged home? The Swedish Couoncil on technology assessment in health care (SBU) 2000. Report No. 153.
    PubMed
  • 22 Livingston DH, Lavery R, Passannante MR. et al Emergency department discharge of patients with a negative cranial computed tomography scan after minimal head injury. Ann Surg 232 2000; 126-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Miller EC, Derlet RW, Kinser D. Minor head trauma: is computed tomography always necessary. Ann Emerg Med 27 1996; 290-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Miller EC, Holmes JF, Derlet RW. Utilizing clinical factors to reduce head CT scan ordering for minor head trauma patients. J Emerg Med 15 1997; 453-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dunham CM, Coates S, Cooper C. Compelling evidence for discretionary brain computed tomographic scanning in those patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Trauma 41 1996; 679-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Glauser J. Head injury: which patients need imaging? Which test is best. Cleve Clin J Med 71 2004; 353-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Stiell IG, Dreyer JF, Worthington JR. et al An "ultra-sensitive" version of the Canadian CT Head Rule for U.S.Physicians (abstract). Acad Emerg Med 08 2001; 109-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Levitt MA, Petersen PL. Loss of consciousness and posttraumatic amnesia are not accurate predictors of need for CT scanning and intensive care/neurosurgical intervention in minor head trauma patients. (abstract). Acad Emerg Med 08 2001; 455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M, Marke LA. Mild head injury: observation or computed tomography? Economic aspects by literature review and decision analysis. Emerg Med J 21 2004; 54-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Livingston DH, Loder PA, Koziol J, Hunt CD. The use of CT scanning to triage patients requiring admission following minimal head injury. J Trauma 31 1999; 483-489
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Saunders CE, Cota R, Barton CA. Reliability of home observation for victims of mild closed head injury. Ann Emerg Med 15 1986; 160-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 af Geijerstam JL, Britton M. Mild head injury: reliability of early computed tomographic findings in triage for admission. Emerg Med J 22 2005; 103-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Head injury. Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults. Clinical Guideline 4. June 2003. Developed by the National Collaborating center for acute care. www.nice.org.uk . (accessed July 1st, 2005)
    PubMed
  • 34 Ingebrigsten T, Romner B, Kock-Jensen C. Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild, and moderate head injuries. J Trauma 48 2000; 760-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Stein SC, Spettell C. a practical classification of closed head injury. The Head Injury Severity Scale (HISS): Brain Inj 09 1995; 437-444
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ibanez J, Arikan F, Pedraza S. et al Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study. J Neurosurg 100 2004; 825-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Committee on Quality Improvement, American Academy of Pediatrics and Commission on clinical Policies and Research, American Academy of Family Physicians. The management of minor closed head injury in children. Pediatrics 104 1999; 1407-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schutzman SA, Barnes P, Duhaime AC. et al Evaluation and management of children younger than two years old with apparently minor head trauma: Proposed guidelines. Pediatrics 107 2001; 989-993
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hoffman PAM, Stapert SZ, Kroonenburg V. et al MR imaging, Single-Photon Emission CT, and Neurocognitive performance after Mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22 2001; 441-449
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chen SHA, Kareken DA, Fastenau PS, Trexler LE, Hutchins GD. A study of persistent post-concussion symptoms in mild head trauma using postiron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 74 2003; 326-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Audenaert K, Jansen HM, Otte A. et al Imaging of mild traumatic brain injury using 57Co and 99m Tc HMPAO SPECT as compared to other diagnostic procedures. Med Sci Monit 09 2003; 112-117
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Levine JD, Davis JT, Sloan JH, Kodituwakku PW, Orrison Jr. WW. Neuromagnetic assessment of pathophysiologic brain activity induced by minor head trauma. AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol 20 1999; 857-866
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hoffman PAM, Kemerink G, Jolles J, Wilmink JT. Quantitative analysis of magnetization transfer images of the brain: the effect of closed head injury, age, and sex on white matter. Mag Reson Med 42 1999; 803-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Kimura H, Meaney DF, McGowan JC. et al Magnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20 1996; 540-546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McGowan JC, Yang JH, Plotkin RC. et al Magnetization transfer imaging in the detection of injury associated with mild head trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 21 2000; 875-880
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Liu AY, maldjian JA, Bagley LJ, Sinson GIP, Grossman RI: Traumatic brain injury: diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings. Am J Neuroradiol 20: 1636-41.
    PubMed
  • 47 Friedman SD, Brooks WM, Jung RE, hart BL, Yeo RA. Proton MR spectroscopic finding correspond to neuropsychological function in traumatic brain injury. Am J Neuroradiol 19 1998; 1879-1885
    PubMedGoogle Scholar