Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2019; 54(02): 109-117
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.09.006
Review Article | Artigo de Revisão
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Thieme Revnter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Modified Stoppa Approach for Acetabulum Fracture: A Review[*]

Article in several languages: português | English
Ashwani Soni
1   Departmento de Ortopedia, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
,
Ravi Gupta
1   Departmento de Ortopedia, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
,
Ramesh Sen
2   Departmento de Ortopedia, Fortis Hospital Mohali, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

05 August 2017

28 September 2018

Publication Date:
15 April 2019 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Fracture acetabulum is a grave injury and a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. Anterior and posterior approaches have been described for fixation of acetabulum fractures. The modified Stoppa approach is considered an alternate to anterior approach, which provides access to pelvis from inside the cavity. The purpose of this article is to review the available literature on use of the modified Stoppa approach in acetabulum fractures. The available data suggest that modified Stoppa approach is useful in anterior acetabulum fractures and some posterior acetabulum fractures, especially where buttressing of medial wall is required.

Keywords

acetabulum - fractures bone - fracture fixation - modified stoppa

* Study conducted at Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India. Publishied originally by Elsevier Editora Ltda.


 

  • References

  • 1 Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. [Surgical treatment of recent fractures of the acetabulum. (Apropos of 46 operated cases)]. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 1962; 88: 369-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Letournel E. Fractures of the cotyloid cavity, study of a series of 75 cases]. J Chir (Paris) 1961; 82: 47-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rives J, Stoppa R, Fortesa L, Nicaise H. [Dacron patches and their place in surgery of groin hernia. 65 cases collected from a complete series of 274 hernia operations]. Ann Chir 1968; 22 (03) 159-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JP, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF. The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64 (02) 269-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Böstman O. A new approach to the internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (297) 28-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (305) 112-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bastian JD, Savic M, Cullmann JL, Zech WD, Djonov V, Keel MJ. Surgical exposures and options for instrumentation in acetabular fracture fixation: Pararectus approach versus the modified Stoppa. Injury 2016; 47 (03) 695-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bible JE, Choxi AA, Kadakia RJ, Evans JM, Mir HR. Quantification of bony pelvic exposure through the modified Stoppa approach. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (06) 320-323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kacra BK, Arazi M, Cicekcibasi AE, Büyükmumcu M, Demirci S. Modified medial Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures: an anatomic study. J Trauma 2011; 71 (05) 1340-1344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Murcia-Asensio A, Ferrero-Manzanal F, Lax-Pérez R, Fernández-Fairén M. Stoppa approach for intrapelvic damage control and reconstruction of complex acetabular defects with intra-pelvic socket migration: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 25: 143-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elmadag M, Acar MA. A modified stoppa (technique) approach for treatment of pediatric acetabular fractures. Case Rep Orthop 2013; 2013: 478131
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Archdeacon MT, Kazemi N, Guy P, Sagi HC. The modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011; 19 (03) 170-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Archdeacon MT. Comparison of the ilioinguinal approach and the anterior intrapelvic approaches for open reduction and internal fixation of the acetabulum. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S6-S9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Collinge CA, Lebus GF. Techniques for reduction of the quadrilateral surface and dome impaction when using the anterior intrapelvic (modified Stoppa) approach. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S20-S24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Guy P. Evolution of the anterior intrapelvic (Stoppa) approach for acetabular fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S1-S5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hagen JE, Weatherford BM, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF. Anterior intrapelvic modification to the ilioinguinal approach. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S10-S13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Khoury A, Weill Y, Mosheiff R. The Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2012; 24 (4-5): 439-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kistler BJ, Sagi HC. Reduction of the posterior column in displaced acetabulum fractures through the anterior intrapelvic approach. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S14-S19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Qureshi AA, Archdeacon MT, Jenkins MA, Infante A, DiPasquale T, Bolhofner BR. Infrapectineal plating for acetabular fractures: a technical adjunct to internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18 (03) 175-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sagi HC, Bolhofner B. Osteotomy of the Anterior Superior Iliac Spine as an Adjunct to Improve Access and Visualization Through the Lateral Window. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (08) e266-e269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vikmanis A, Vikmanis A, Jakusonoka R, Jumtins A, Pavare Z. Mid-term outcome of patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures following internal fixation through a modified Stoppa approach. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79 (06) 660-666
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jakob M, Droeser R, Zobrist R, Messmer P, Regazzoni P. A less invasive anterior intrapelvic approach for the treatment of acetabular fractures and pelvic ring injuries. J Trauma 2006; 60 (06) 1364-1370
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ponsen KJ, Joosse P, Schigt A, Goslings JC, Luitse JS. Internal fracturefixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results. J Trauma 2006; 61 (03) 662-667 . Erratum in. J Trauma 2007;62(6):1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chesser TJ, Eardley W, Mattin A, Lindh AM, Acharya M, Ward AJ. The modified ilioinguinal and anterior intrapelvic approaches for acetabular fracture fixation: indications, quality of reduction, and early outcome. J Orthop Trauma 2015; 29 (Suppl. 02) S25-S28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bastian JD, Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Keel MJ. Mid-term results in relation to age and analysis of predictive factors after fixation of acetabular fractures using the modified Stoppa approach. Injury 2013; 44 (12) 1793-1798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Keel MJ, Tomagra S, Bonel HM, Siebenrock KA, Bastian JD. Clinical results of acetabular fracture management with the Pararectus approach. Injury 2014; 45 (12) 1900-1907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, Bergmann M, Bonel HM, Büchler L. , et al. The Pararectus approach for anterior intrapelvic management of acetabular fractures: an anatomical study and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (03) 405-411
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rocca G, Spina M, Mazzi M. Anterior Combined Endopelvic (ACE) approach for the treatment of acetabular and pelvic ring fractures: A new proposal. Injury 2014; 45 (Suppl. 06) S9-S15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Andersen RC, O'Toole RV, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Frisch HM, Turen CW. Modified stoppa approach for acetabular fractures with anterior and posterior column displacement: quantification of radiographic reduction and analysis of interobserver variability. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (05) 271-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sagi HC, Afsari A, Dziadosz D. The anterior intra-pelvic (modified rives-stoppa) approach for fixation of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (05) 263-270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Laflamme GY, Hebert-Davies J, Rouleau D, Benoit B, Leduc S. Internal fixation of osteopenic acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. Injury 2011; 42 (10) 1130-1134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Elmadag M, Guzel Y, Aksoy Y, Arazi M. Surgical Treatment of Displaced Acetabular Fractures Using a Modified Stoppa Approach. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (02) e340-e345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kim HY, Yang DS, Park CK, Choy WS. Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7 (01) 29-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Liu Y, Yang H, Li X, Yang SH, Lin JH. Newly modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fractures. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (07) 1347-1353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Casstevens C, Archdeacon MT, dʼHeurle A, Finnan R. Intrapelvic reduction and buttress screw stabilization of dome impaction of the acetabulum: a technical trick. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (06) e133-e137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Laflamme GY, Hebert-Davies J. Direct reduction technique for superomedial dome impaction in geriatric acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (02) e39-e43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Shazar N, Eshed I, Ackshota N, Hershkovich O, Khazanov A, Herman A. Comparison of acetabular fracture reduction quality by the ilioinguinal or the anterior intrapelvic (modified Rives-Stoppa) surgical approaches. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (06) 313-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ma K, Luan F, Wang X, Ao Y, Liang Y, Fang Y. , et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the modified Stoppa versus the ilioinguinal approach for acetabular fractures. Orthopedics 2013; 36 (10) e1307-e1315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Elmadağ M, Güzel Y, Acar MA, Uzer G, Arazi M. The Stoppa approach versus the ilioinguinal approach for anterior acetabular fractures: a case control study assessing blood loss complications and function outcomes. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (06) 675-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Isaacson MJ, Taylor BC, French BG, Poka A. Treatment of acetabulum fractures through the modified Stoppa approach: strategies and outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (11) 3345-3352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hammad AS, El-Khadrawe TA. Accuracy of reduction and early clinical outcome in acetabular fractures treated by the standard ilio-inguinal versus the Stoppa/iliac approaches. Injury 2015; 46 (02) 320-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Dailey SK, Archdeacon MT. Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabulum fractures: does timing of surgery affect blood loss and OR time?. J Orthop Trauma 2014; 28 (09) 497-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996; 78 (11) 1632-1645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 D'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36-A (03) 451-475
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Merle D'Aubigné R. [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970]. Rev Chir Orthop Repar Appar Mot 1990; 76 (06) 371-374
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; (205) 230-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46: 1615-1646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar