CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(08): E1015-E1019
DOI: 10.1055/a-0599-6260
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

Optimal timing for precutting in cases with difficult biliary cannulation

Yuichi Takano
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Masatsugu Nagahama
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Fumitaka Niiya
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Takahiro Kobayashi
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Eiichi Yamamura
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Naotaka Maruoka
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 06. Januar 2018

accepted after revision 20. Februar 2018

Publikationsdatum:
10. August 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims In endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), precutting is widely used when achieving biliary cannulation is difficult. However, no consensus has been reached with regard to the best time to initiate precutting.

Patients and methods We retrospectively examined 63 patients who underwent precutting for naïve papilla with difficulty in biliary cannulation between 2009 and 2016. The outcomes of the early precut group (≤ 20 min from cannulation until initiating precutting) and the late precut group (> 20 min) were compared.

Results Of the 63 patients, 17 (27 %) were in the early precut group and 46 (73 %) were in the late precut group; median time until the initiating precutting was 28 minutes (7 – 50). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of clinical features (age, sex, and indication for ERCP), precutting method, and rate of pancreatic duct stent placement. Significantly higher rates of successful biliary cannulation were observed in the early precut group (16/17; 94 %) than in the late precut group (32/46; 70 %) (P < 0.05). In 13 patients in whom precutting was commenced after 40 minutes, the rate of successful biliary cannulation was very low at 53 % (7/13). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of incidence of complications (pancreatitis in 5 patients and bleeding in 1 patient).

Conclusion In actual clinical practice, precutting is commenced approximately 30 minutes after cannulation; however, to successfully achieve biliary cannulation, precutting is recommended to be performed within 20 minutes. Precutting is effective when little inflammation and swelling of the ampulla of Vater is observed. This study was limited in that it was single-center, retrospective and had a small subject sample.

 
  • References

  • 1 Testoni PA, Testoni S, Giussani A. Difficult biliary cannulation during ERCP: how to facilitate biliary access and minimize the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 596-603
  • 2 Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P. et al. BSG Audit of ERCP. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56: 821-829
  • 3 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E. et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834
  • 4 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM. et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2343-2350
  • 5 Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. et al. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 605-618
  • 6 Dumonceau JM, Devière J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1998; 30: S80
  • 7 Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL. et al. UDOGUIA-04 Group. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 700-709
  • 8 Ito K, Horaguchi J, Fujita N. et al. Clinical usefulness of double-guidewire technique for difficult biliary cannulation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 442-449
  • 9 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J. et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
  • 10 Mallery S, Matlock J, Freeman ML. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: Report of 6 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 100-107
  • 11 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Aabakken L. et al. Papillary cannulation and sphincterotomy techniques at ERCP: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 657-683
  • 12 Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P. et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 58-65
  • 13 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A. et al. xTiming of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 473-479
  • 14 de Weerth A, Seitz U, Zhong Y. et al. Primary precutting versus conventional over-the-wire sphincterotomy for bile duct access: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 1235-1240
  • 15 Khatibian M, Sotoudehmanesh R, Ali-Asgari A. et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard method for cannulation of common bile duct: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Iran Med 2008; 11: 16-20
  • 16 Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Xu MD. et al. Application of needle-knife in difficult biliary cannulation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2006; 5: 590-594
  • 17 Manes G, Di Giorgio P, Repici A. et al. An analysis of the factors associated with the development of complications in patients undergoing precut sphincterotomy: a prospective, controlled, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2412-2417
  • 18 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM. et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 381-388
  • 19 Gong B, Hao L, Bie L. et al. Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2670-2680
  • 20 Navaneethan U, Konjeti R, Venkatesh PG. et al. Early precut sphincterotomy and the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related complications: An updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 200-208
  • 21 Choudhary A, Winn J, Siddique S. et al. Effect of precut sphincterotomy on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4093-4101
  • 22 Mavrogiannis C, Liatsos C, Romanos A. et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus needle-knife papillotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 334-339
  • 23 Katsinelos P, Gkagkalis S, Chatzimavroudis G. et al. Comparison of three types of precut technique to achieve common bile duct cannulation: a retrospective analysis of 274 cases. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 3286-3292
  • 24 Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB. et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434