Fake Science – auch ein Problem in der Physiotherapieforschung?

physioscience 2018; 14(04): 149-150
DOI: 10.1055/a-0749-0408

Editorial

Authors

Literatur
1 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis – Denkschrift. 2013 www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf (22.09.2018)
2 Samuel A. An Indian physiotherapist’s suggestions to keep out of fake journals. Physiother – J Indian Assoc Physiother 2018; 12: 43 . doi: 10.4103/PJIAP.PJIAP_32_17
3 Government of Canada. Model policy on scientific integrity. 2018 www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/052.nsf/eng/00010.html (22.09.2018)
4 Beall J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature 2012; 489: 179-179 . doi:10.1038/489179a
5 Beall J. Beall’s List of Predatory Journals and Publishers. 2018 www.beallslist.weebly.com/# (22.09.2018)
6 Kuhn C, Castaño Z. Boosting the career development of postdocs with a peer-to-peer mentor circles program. Nat Biotechnol 2016; 34: 781-783 . doi: org/10.1038/nbt.3631
7 Schiltz M. Science without Publication Paywalls: cOAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 656 . doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00656