PDF herunterladen
Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2019; 144(13): 884-891
DOI: 10.1055/a-0828-9675
Dossier
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Schock – eine Übersicht für die klinische Praxis

Shock – Review for Clinicians
Dorothea Hempel
,
Guido Michels
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. Juni 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Diagnosing and managing patients in shock is a challenge for the treating clinicians in acute medicine. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial. Mortality of septic shock is between 40 % and 60 %, and that of the cardiogenic shock about 40 %. This article provides an overview of diagnostic approaches to the patient in shock, different aetiologies and treatment strategies, and it guides the clinician through the management from first contact until definite treatment.

Aufgrund der hohen Mortalität bei „Schock“ ist zügiges und adäquates Handeln essenziell. Grundlage ist das Wissen über die notwendige Diagnostik, die unterschiedlichen Ätiologien und die therapeutischen Ansätze der verschiedenen Schockformen. Dieser Beitrag zeichnet gezielt den Ablauf in der Versorgung des Schockpatienten nach, vom Erstkontakt bis zum Beginn der spezifischen Therapie, und bietet somit einen Leitfaden für die klinische Praxis.

Schlüsselwörter

Akutmedizin - Notaufnahme - kardiogener Schock - septischer Schock - anaphylaktischer Schock

Key words

acute medicine - emergency department - cardiogenic shock - septic shock - anaphylactic shock
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1726-1734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Polytrauma Guideline Update Group. Level 3 guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries: AWMF Register-Nr. 012/019. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018; 44 (01) 3-271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Marx G. New AWMF S3-guidelines for volume therapy: goodbye emotions – welcome evidence. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2015; 110: 108-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Werdan K, Russ M, Buerke M. et al. Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 Guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 343-351
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hempel D, Pfister R, Michels G. Hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care and emergency medicine: Integration of clinical signs and ultrasound findings. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2016; 111: 596-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hempel D, Pfister R, Michels G. Structured bedside-ultrasound in intensive care medicine. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2017; 112: 741-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Adler C, Treskatsch S, Pfister R. et al. Estimation of Preload Dependence in Intensive Care – Step by Step. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2019; 144: 340-345
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 304-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Freund Y, Lemachatti N, Krastinova E. et al. Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department. JAMA 2017; 317: 301-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ring J, Beyer K, Biedermann T. et al. Guideline for acute therapy und management of anaphylaxis. S2 guideline of DGAKI, AeDA, GPA, DAAU, BVKJ, ÖGAI, SGAI, DGAI, DGP, DGPM, AGATE and DAAB. Allergo J Int 2014; 23: 96-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wood JP, Traub SJ, Lipinski C. Safety of epinephrine for anaphylaxis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Med 2013; 4: 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Popa C, Popa F, Grigorean VT. et al. Vascular dysfunctions following spinal cord injury. J Med Life 2010; 3: 275-285
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Arlt W. Society for Endocrinology Clinical C. Society for Endocrinology Endocrine Emergency Guidance: Emergency management of acute adrenal insufficiency (adrenal crisis) in adult patients. Endocr Connect 2016; 5: G1-G3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brenner M, Teeter W, Hoehn M. et al. Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta for Proximal Aortic Control in Patients With Severe Hemorrhage and Arrest. JAMA Surg 2018; 153: 130-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Götz M, Anders M, Biecker E. et al. S2k Guideline Gastrointestinal Bleeding – Guideline of the German Society of Gastroenterology DGVS. Z Gastroenterol 2017; 55: 883-936
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Thiele H, Desch S. CULPRIT-SHOCK (Culprit Lesion Only PCI Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock): Implications on Guideline Recommendations. Circulation 2018; 137: 1314-1316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Hajjar LA, Teboul JL. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock: State of the Art. Crit Care 2019; 23: 76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G. et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 3033-3069, 3069a – 3069k
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar