CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79(04): 402-408
DOI: 10.1055/a-0834-8199
GebFra Science
Original Article/Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Induction of Labour in Growth Restricted and Small for Gestational Age Foetuses – A Historical Cohort Study

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Sven Kehl
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Christel Weiss
2   Medizinische Statistik, Biomathematik und Informationsverarbeitung, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Ulf Dammer
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Sebastian Berlit
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Thomas Große-Steffen
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Florian Faschingbauer
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Marc Sütterlin
3   Frauenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
,
Matthias W. Beckmann
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
,
Michael O. Schneider
1   Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 June 2018

accepted 26 November 2018

Publication Date:
12 April 2019 (online)

Abstract

Purpose Induction of labour for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) foetus or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is common, but data are limited. The aim of this study was therefore to compare labour induction for SGA/IUGR with cases of normal foetal growth above the 10th percentile.

Material and Methods This historical multicentre cohort study included singleton pregnancies at term. Labour induction for SGA/IUGR (IUGR group) was compared with cases of foetal growth above the 10th percentile (control group). Primary outcome measure was caesarean section rate.

Results The caesarean section rate was not different between the 2 groups (27.0 vs. 26.2%, p = 0.9154). In the IUGR group, abnormal CTG was more common (30.8 vs. 21.9%, p = 0.0214), and foetal blood analysis was done more often (2.5 vs. 0.5%, p = 0.0261). There were more postpartum transfers to the NICU in the IUGR group (40.0 vs. 12.8%, p < 0.0001), too.

Conclusion Induction of labour for foetal growth restriction was not associated with an increased rate of caesarean section.

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 31. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London. February 2013. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_31.pdf last access: 24.06.2018
  • 2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 134. Fetal Growth Restriction. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1122-1133
  • 3 Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B. et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 333-339
  • 4 Trudell AS, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG. et al. Risk of stillbirth after 37 weeks in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208: 376.e1-376.e7
  • 5 Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M. et al. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. BMJ 2013; 346: f108
  • 6 Lees C, Marlow N, Arabin B. et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 400-408
  • 7 Boers KE, Vijgen SM, Bijlenga D. et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 2010; 341: c7087
  • 8 Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (04) CD003246
  • 9 Rempen A. [Standards in ultrasound examination in early pregnancy. Recommendation of DEGUM Stage III of the German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (Gynecology and Obstetrics Section) and ARGUS (Working Group of Ultrasound Diagnosis of DGGG). December 2000 revision]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2001; 205: 162-165
  • 10 Kalafat E, Morales-Rosello J, Thilaganathan B. et al. Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218: 134.e1-134.e8
  • 11 Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (06) CD001338
  • 12 Duro-Gomez J, Garrido-Oyarzun MF, Rodriguez-Marin AB. et al. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cookʼs balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296: 777-781
  • 13 van Wyk L, Boers KE, van der Post JA. et al. Effects on (neuro) developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growth-restricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 406.e1-406.e7
  • 14 Chavakula PR, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A. et al. Misoprostol versus Foley catheter insertion for induction of labor in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 129: 152-155
  • 15 Kehl S, Dotsch J, Hecher K. et al. Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 1157-1173
  • 16 Ogunyemi D, Friedman P, Betcher K. et al. Obstetrical correlates and perinatal consequences of neonatal hypoglycemia in term infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 1372-1377
  • 17 Kehl S, Weiss C, Dammer U. et al. Effect of Premature Rupture of Membranes on Induction of Labor: A Historical Cohort Study. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 1174-1181
  • 18 Dammer U, Bogner R, Weiss C. et al. Influence of body mass index on induction of labor: A historical cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44: 697-707