CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(09): E1166-E1174
DOI: 10.1055/a-0965-8531
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band

Jérémie Jacques
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
2   Bio-Em, Xlim CNRS UMR 7252 Limoges, France
,
Aurélie Charissoux
3   Pathology Division, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Pierre Bordillon
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Romain Legros
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Jérôme Rivory
4   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
,
Valérie Hervieu
5   Pathology Division, East Hospital Group, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
,
Jérémie Albouys
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Anne Guyot
3   Pathology Division, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Thierry Ponchon
4   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
6   Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France
,
Denis Sautereau
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Sebastien Kerever
7   Statistic Department, Lariboisière Hospital, APHP, Paris France
,
Mathieu Pioche
4   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pavillon L, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
6   Inserm U1032, Labtau, Lyon, France
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 05. Dezember 2018

accepted after revision 22. Mai 2019

Publikationsdatum:
29. August 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims ESD in the colon is more challenging technically than in other locations. Here, we report the first comparative case series of colon ESD using a systematic countertraction strategy using two clips and a rubber band.

Patients and methods Retrospective comparative study of classic versus countertraction colon ESD performed in colon ESD cases collected prospectively at Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital and Limoges University Hospital from January 2016 until December 2017.

Results The study included 192 cases (control = 76, countertraction = 116). Countertraction using the double clip and rubber band technique versus the control group resulted in a significant decrease in the procedure time (94.7 vs. 117 min; P = 0.004) and significant increases in procedure speed (28.2 vs. 16.7 mm2/min; P < 0.0001), en bloc resection rate (95.7 % vs. 76.3 %, P < 0.0001), and R0 resection rate (78.5 % vs. 64.5 %, P = 0.04).

At an individual operator point of view, results varied between operators but the double clip countertraction strategy significantly increased the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and speed of dissection for each of the 4 operators.

Conclusion Systematic countertraction using a double clip and rubber band facilitates colon ESD. This strategy should become the standard for colon ESD.

 
  • References

  • 1 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829-854
  • 2 Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Rasouli KN. et al. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut 2018; 67: 1965-1973
  • 3 Jacques J, Charissoux A, Legros R. et al. Double-clip counter-traction using a rubber band is a useful and adaptive tool for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 179-181
  • 4 Jacob H, Toyonaga T, Ohara Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of cecal lesions in proximity to the appendiceal orifice. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 829-836
  • 5 Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P. A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2013; 4: 244-248
  • 6 Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Desomer L. et al. The size, morphology, site, and access score predicts critical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 684-692
  • 7 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y k. et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1217-1225
  • 8 Kanamori A, Nakano M, Kondo M. et al. Clinical effectiveness of the pocket-creation method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open 2017; 5: E1299-E1305
  • 9 Pioche M, Rivory J, Lépilliez V. et al. Tunnel-and-bridge strategy for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: tips to allow strong countertraction without clip and line. Endoscopy 2017; 49: E123-E124
  • 10 Takezawa T, Hayashi Y, Shinozaki S. et al. The Pocket-creation method facilitates colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1045-1053
  • 11 Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Maselli R. et al. Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality. Ann Transl Med 2018; 6: 262
  • 12 Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas D, Arnau MR. et al. Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by a new traction method: the clip-band technique. A feasibility study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1137-1141
  • 13 Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1370-1374
  • 14 Ritsuno H, Sakamoto N, Osada T. et al. Prospective clinical trial of traction device-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial colorectal tumors using the S-O clip. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 3143-3149
  • 15 Saito Y, Bhatt A, Matsuda T. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its journey to the West. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 90-92
  • 16 Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and EMR for large colorectal polyps: “the perfect is the enemy of good”. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 87-89