Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for solid lesions: Does a “belt and suspenders” approach add value?

Endoscopy 2020; 52(01): 9-10
DOI: 10.1055/a-1039-1327

Editorial

Referring to van Riet PA et al. p. 37–44

Autor*innen

Douglas G. Adler

Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

References
1 Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP. et al. Rapid on-site evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 872-882
2 Adler DG, Muthusamy VR, Ehrlich DS. et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: experience in 200 patients. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: 99-104
3 Ganc R, Colaiacovo R, Carbonari A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, comparative study using the 22 Gauge EchoTip® ProCoreTM HD (A) and the 22 Gauge EchoTip® Ultra HD(B) endoscopic ultrasound needles. Endosc Ultrasound 2014; 3 (Suppl. 01) S11
4 Alatawi A, Beuvon F, Grabar S. et al. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. United European Gastroenterol J 2015; 3: 343-352
5 van Riet PA, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone M. et al. Combined versus single use 20 G fine-needle biopsy and 25 G fine-needle aspiration for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of solid gastrointestinal lesions. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 37-44
6 Saha M, Hossain A, Bhuiyan SH. et al. Role of crush smear cytology in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal malignancy. Mymensingh Med J 2014; 23: 496-502
7 El HajjII, Wu H, Reuss S. et al. Prospective assessment of the performance of a new fine needle biopsy device for EUS-guided sampling of solid lesions. Clin Endosc 2018; 51: 576-583