Ultraschall Med 2020; 41(02): 120-137
DOI: 10.1055/a-1079-0013
Continuing Medical Education

Abnormal Placentation and Umbilical Cord Insertion

Abnorme Plazentation und Nabelschnurinsertion
Markus Hoopmann
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Karl Oliver Kagan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

In the last decades, abnormal placentation and umbilical cord insertion have become an increasingly relevant and feared pathology in obstetrics with increased morbidity and mortality for mother and child. In addition to several increasingly common risk factors, such as assisted reproduction, the main reason for the increased occurrence is the greater frequency of Cesarean sections. Correct diagnosis, which is primarily determined sonographically, is essential for targeted perinatal management. In particular, the diagnostic criteria and current management recommendations are described in the following article.

Zusammenfassung

Störungen der Plazentation und Nabelschnurinsertion haben sich in den letzten Jahrzehnten zu einer zunehmend relevanten und gefürchteten Pathologie der Geburtshilfe mit erhöhter Morbidität und Mortalität für Mutter und Kind entwickelt. Neben einigen zunehmend häufigeren Risikofaktoren wie beispielsweise assistierte Reproduktion liegt die Hauptursache für das vermehrte Auftreten in der angestiegenen Häufigkeit der Sectio caesarea.

Essenziell für ein gezieltes perinatales Management ist die korrekte Diagnosestellung, welche vorrangig sonografisch erfolgt. Im folgenden Artikel sollen insbesondere die diagnostischen Kriterien und aktuellen Managementempfehlungen vorgestellt werden.



Publication History

Article published online:
07 April 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • References

  • 1 Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG. et al. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management. BJOG 2018; 126: e1-e48
  • 2 D'Antonio F, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Lim PS. et al. Counseling in fetal medicine: evidence-based answers to clinical questions on morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 290-301
  • 3 Chantraine F, Langhoff-Roos J. Abnormally Invasive Placenta AIP. Awareness and pro-active management is necessary. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2013; 92: 369-371
  • 4 Sinkey RG, Odibo AO. Society of Maternal-Fetal (SMFM) Publications Committee. et al. #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 615-619
  • 5 Rosenberg T, Pariente G, Sergienko R. et al. Critical analysis of risk factors and outcome of placenta previa. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284: 47-51
  • 6 Becker RH, Vonk R, Mende BC. et al. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for prediction of placenta previa at delivery: evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2001; 17: 496-501
  • 7 Morlando M, Sarno L, Napolitano R. et al. Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2013; 92: 457-460
  • 8 Klar M, Michels KB. Cesarean section and placental disorders in subsequent pregnancies – a meta-analysis. J Perinat Med 2014; 42: 571-583
  • 9 Buca D, Liberati M, Cali G. et al. Influence of prenatal diagnosis of abnormally invasive placenta on maternal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 304-309
  • 10 Ruiter L, Kok N, Limpens J. et al. Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 516-522
  • 11 Kagan KO, Hoopmann M, Sonek J. Vasa praevia – easy to miss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51: 283-284
  • 12 Oyelese Y, Catanzarite V, Prefumo F. et al. Vasa previa: the impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 937-942
  • 13 D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509-517
  • 14 Calì G, Forlani F, Timor-Trisch I. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the depth of invasion in women at risk of abnormally invasive placenta: A prospective longitudinal study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2018; 97: 1219-1227
  • 15 Collins SL, Alemdar B, van Beekhuizen HJ. et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of abnormally invasive placenta: recommendations from the International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220: 511-526
  • 16 D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Palacios-Jaraquemada J. et al. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 8-16
  • 17 Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I. et al. Placenta previa: distance to internal os and mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 266.e1–e5
  • 18 Collins SL, Chantraine F, Morgan TK. et al. Abnormally adherent and invasive placenta: a spectrum disorder in need of a name. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2018; 51: 165-166
  • 19 Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM. et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2018; 140: 265-273
  • 20 Jauniaux ERM, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG. et al. Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management Green-top Guideline No. 27a. BJOG 2019; 126: E1-E48