Peroral endoscopic septotomy for short-septum Zenker’s diverticulum

Abstract

Background Treatments of Zenker’s diverticulum aim to dissect the cricopharyngeal muscle, removing the underlying source of dysfunction. This is difficult in patients with a short-septum (≤ 20 mm) diverticulum because the limited anatomical space restricts the operating area for either rigid or flexible endoscopic approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a novel third-space approach, peroral endoscopic septotomy (POES), for treating symptomatic patients with short-septum Zenker’s diverticulum.

Methods All patients with short-septum Zenker’s diverticulum who were referred for endoscopic repair from September 2017, were considered for the study. Outcomes included procedure-related adverse events and symptom improvement. The Dakkak – Bennett score was used to quantify dysphagia.

Results 20 patients (men 12, women 8; mean age 67.9 years [SD 14.3]) underwent POES. All procedures were performed with patients under deep sedation. Mean size of Zenker’s diverticulum was 17.5 mm (SD 3.0) and mean dysphagia score was 2.7 (SD 0.5). Average procedure time was 13.8 minutes (SD 5.1). No intra- or post- procedural adverse events occurred. Septal myotomy was successfully completed in all patients. Dysphagia significantly improved in 19 out of 20 patients. Dakkak – Bennett score improved to 0.3 (SD 0.5), P < 0.0001). No recurrences were reported in a mean follow-up time of 12.0 months (SD 3.7, range 6 – 20).

Conclusions POES may be considered as a potential alternative for the treatment of short-septum Zenker’s diverticulum. Further data are required to validate this technique and compare it with already available rigid and flexible approaches.

• References

• 1 Watemberg S, Landau O, Avrahami R. Zenkerʼs diverticulum: reappraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1494-1498
• 2 Repici A, Pagano N, Fumagalli U. et al. Transoral treatment of Zenker diverticulum: flexible endoscopy versus endoscopic stapling. A retrospective comparison of outcomes. Dis Esophagus 2011; 24: 235-239
• 3 Ishaq S, Hassan C, Antonello A. et al. Flexible endoscopic treatment for Zenker’s diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 1076-1089.e5
• 4 Li QL, Chen WF, Zhang XC. et al. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division: a novel technique for treating Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastroenterology 2016; 151: 1071-1074
• 5 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 6 Hernández Mondragón OV, Solórzano Pineda MO, Blancas Valencia JM. Zenker’s diverticulum: Submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division (Z-POEM). Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 124
• 7 Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol 1992; 14: 99-100
• 8 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 9 Costamagna G, Iacopini F, Bizzotto A. et al. Prognostic variables for the clinical success of flexible endoscopic septotomy of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 765-773
• 10 Yang J, Novak S, Ujiki M. et al. An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic muyotomy in the management of Zenker’s diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 163-168