Aktuelle Aspekte der Verfahrenswahl bei Adipositas-Chirurgie

Ilona Hering; Arne Dietrich; Florian Seyfried

doi:10.1055/a-1260-4795

Adipositas - Ursachen, Folgeerkrankungen, Therapie, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Adipositas - Ursachen, Folgeerkrankungen, Therapie 2020; 14(04): 190-198
DOI: 10.1055/a-1260-4795

Review

Aktuelle Aspekte der Verfahrenswahl bei Adipositas-Chirurgie

Actual aspects of treatment options in metabolic and bariatric surgery

Autor*innen

Ilona Hering

¹Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg,, Deutschland
Arne Dietrich

²Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig,, Deutschland
Florian Seyfried

¹Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg,, Deutschland

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Die Adipositas- bzw. metabolische Chirurgie stellt derzeit evidenzbasiert die einzige Therapiemodalität dar, die bei Patienten mit drittgradiger Adipositas zu einem nachhaltigen und auch klinisch relevanten Gewichtsverlust, zu einer Verbesserung der Lebensqualität und Funktionalität sowie zu einer Minderung vorliegender Adipositas-assoziierter Begleiterkrankungen und damit zu einer Verlängerung der Lebenserwartung führt.

Die Operationen werden vorzugsweise in zertifizierten Zentren mit niedriger perioperativer Morbidität und Letalität in Schlüsselloch-Technik durchgeführt. Die weltweit am häufigsten durchgeführten adipositaschirurgischen Verfahren sind die Sleevegastrektomie (SG), der Roux-en-Y-Magenbypass (RYGB) und der Omega-Loop-Bypass (oder Mini-Gastric-Bypass) (MGB). Daneben existieren weitere intestinale Bypassverfahren.

Die Entscheidung für das jeweilige Operationsverfahren ist im interdisziplinären Konsens von einem Team, bestehend aus Chirurgen, Internisten, Psychiatern/Psychologen und Ökotrophologen, individuell für jeden Patienten in Abhängigkeit der Komorbiditäten und patientenbezogener Daten zu treffen. Im Nachfolgenden werden die verschiedenen Operationsverfahren im Hinblick auf ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteilen miteinander verglichen und auf die für das jeweilige Verfahren am besten geeignete Patientengruppe eingegangen.

Abstract

Based on the available evidence, metabolic and bariatric surgery is the only therapeutic option that leads to sustained and clinically relevant weight loss, significant improvement of functionality and quality of life, as well as attenuation of obesity associated diseases along with prolonged life expectancy in morbidly obese patients. Metabolic surgery is usually performed minimally invasive with low perioperative morbidity and mortality preferably in certified centres. The most commonly performed operations are the sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the omega-loop (mini gastric) bypass. Aside, there are further intestinal bypass procedures available.

A multidisciplinary team of surgeons, internists, psychiatrists/psychologists and ecotrophologists along with the patient should decide together which surgical procedure is the most appropriate depending on individual co-morbidities and patient´s preference. In the following the different surgical procedures will be compared head to head regarding its advantages and disadvantages. Further, we highlight which procedure is the most appropriate for which patient group.

Schlüsselwörter

Adipositas-Chirurgie - metabolische Chirurgie - Verfahrenswahl - Schlauchmagen - Roux-en-Y-Magenbypass

Key words

metaboic surgery - bariatric surgery - treatment options - sleevegastrectomie - Roux-en-Y-gastric-bypass

Volltext

Referenzen

Literatur
1 Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P. et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: Collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 2009; 373: 1083-1096. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60318-4
2 Laxy M, Stark R, Peters A. et al. The Non-Linear Relationship between BMI and Health Care Costs and the Resulting Cost Fraction Attributable to Obesity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14. doi:10.3390/ijerph14090984.
3 Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A. et al. Bariatric-metabolic surgery versus conventional medical treatment in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: 5 year follow-up of an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2015; 386: 964-973. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00075-6
4 Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T. et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama 2018; 319: 255-265. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20897
5 Dietrich A. S3-Leitlinie: Chirurgie der Adipositas und metabolischer Erkrankungen. 2018
6 Seyfried F, Buhr HJ, Klinger C. et al. Quality indicators for metabolic and bariatric surgery in Germany: Evidence-based development of an indicator panel for the quality of results, indications and structure. Der Chirurg Zeitschrift Fur Alle Geb Der Operativen Medizen 2018; 89: 4-16. doi:10.1007/s00104-017-0563-4
7 Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P. et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 3783-3794. doi:10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2
8 Chiappetta S, Stier C, Squillante S. et al. The importance of the Edmonton Obesity Staging System in predicting postoperative outcome and 30-day mortality after metabolic surgery. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2016; 12: 1847-1855. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.042
9 Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P. et al. Bariatric Surgery and Endoluminal Procedures: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2014. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 2279-2289. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-2666-x
10 Wehrtmann FS, de la Garza JR, Kowalewski KF. et al. Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 640-656. doi:10.1007/s11695-019-04230-7
11 Wilkinson KH, Helm M, Lak K. et al. The Risk of Post-operative Complications in Super-Super Obesity Compared to Super Obesity in Accredited Bariatric Surgery Centers. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 2964-2971. doi:10.1007/s11695-019-03942-0
12 Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C. et al. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: A meta-analysis. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2018; 14: 741-747. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2018.02.027
13 Zhang Y, Wang J, Sun X. et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: A meta-analysis of 21 studies. Obes Surg 2015; 25: 19-26. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1385-9
14 Salminen P, Helmiö M, Ovaska J. et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss at 5 Years Among Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama 2018; 319: 241-254. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20313
15 Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E. et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
16 Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Andalib A. et al. Individualized Metabolic Surgery Score: Procedure Selection Based on Diabetes Severity. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 650-657. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000002407
17 Stroh C, Benedix F, Meyer F. et al. Nutrient Deficiencies after Bariatric Surgery - Systematic Literature Review and Suggestions for Diagnostics and Treatment. Zentralbl Chir 2015; 140: 407-416. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1328594
18 Seyfried F, Wierlemann A, Bala M. et al. Dumping syndrome: Diagnostics and therapeutic options. Der Chirurg Zeitschrift Fur Alle Geb Der Operativen Medizen 2015; 86: 847-854. doi:10.1007/s00104-015-0047-3
19 Jiménez A, Ceriello A, Casamitjana R. et al. Remission of type 2 diabetes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy is associated with a distinct glycemic profile. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 316-322. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000586
20 Genco A, Soricelli E, Casella G. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A possible, underestimated long-term complication. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2017; 13: 568-574. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.029
21 Lim CH, Lee PC, Lim E. et al. Resolution of Erosive Esophagitis After Conversion from Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2020; 1-9. doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04913-6.
22 Dietrich A. Wird die laparoskopische Sleeve-Gastrektomie als „Stand-alone“-Verfahren weiter existieren?. Der Chirurg 2018; 89: 583-588. doi:10.1007/s00104-018-0680-8
23 Shoar S, Shahabuddin Hoseini S, Naderan M. et al. Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2017; 13: 652-659. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.10.017
24 Aelfers S, Janssen IMC, Aarts EO. et al. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Not a Contraindication for Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 1681-1687. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-3076-9
25 Andalib A, Aminian A, Khorgami Z. et al. Early Postoperative Outcomes of Primary Bariatric Surgery in Patients on Chronic Steroid or Immunosuppressive Therapy. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 1479-1486. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1923-0
26 Heshmati K, Lo T, Tavakkoli A. et al. Short-Term Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 228: 893-901. e891. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.01.021.
27 Lenzen-Schulte M. Nur Hürden statt Hilfe für Adipöse. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2018; 11: 484-488
28 Nevo N, Abu-Abeid S, Lahat G. et al. Converting a Sleeve Gastrectomy to a Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure-Is It Worth It?. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 364-368. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-2856-6
29 Poublon N, Chidi I, Bethlehem M. et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 3287-3294. doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x
30 Bashah M, Aleter A, Baazaoui J. et al. Single Anastomosis Duodeno-ileostomy (SADI-S) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) as Revisional Procedures for Patients with Weight Recidivism After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes. Obes Surg. 2020 doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04933-2.
31 Chiappetta S, Stier C, Scheffel O. et al. Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Second Step Procedure After Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Retrospective Cohort Study. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 819-827. doi:10.1007/s11695-018-03629-y
32 Khrucharoen U, Juo YY, Chen Y. et al. Indications, Operative Techniques, and Outcomes for Revisional Operation Following Mini-Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 1564-1573. doi:10.1007/s11695-019-04276-7
33 Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP. et al. Bariatric Surgery versus Intensive Medical Therapy for Diabetes - 5-Year Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 641-651. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1600869
34 Benotti P, Wood GC, Winegar DA. et al. Risk factors associated with mortality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259: 123-130. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828a0ee4
35 Stenberg E, Szabo E, Ågren G. et al. Closure of mesenteric defects in laparoscopic gastric bypass: A multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 1397-1404. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01126-5
36 Stenberg E, Szabo E, Ottosson J. et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass in a randomized clinical trial compared with a concurrent national database. Br J Surg 2017; 104: 562-569. doi:10.1002/bjs.10448
37 Pucci A, Tymoszuk U, Cheung WH. et al. Type 2 diabetes remission 2 years post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: The role of the weight loss and comparison of DiaRem and DiaBetter scores. Diabetic Med J Br Diabetic Assoc 2018; 35: 360-367. doi:10.1111/dme.13532
38 Dicker D, Golan R, Aron-Wisnewsky J. et al. Prediction of Long-Term Diabetes Remission After RYGB, Sleeve Gastrectomy, and Adjustable Gastric Banding Using DiaRem and Advanced-DiaRem Scores. Obes Surg 2019; 29: 796-804. doi:10.1007/s11695-018-3583-3
39 Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH. et al. Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Obes Surg 2017; 27: 2-21. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2457-9
40 D’Silva M, Bhasker AG, Kantharia NS. et al. High-Percentage Pathological Findings in Obese Patients Suggest that Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy Should Be Made Mandatory Prior to Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 2753-2759. doi:10.1007/s11695-018-3230-z
41 Wanjura V, Szabo E, Österberg J. et al. Morbidity of cholecystectomy and gastric bypass in a national database. Br J Surg 2018; 105: 121-127. doi:10.1002/bjs.10666
42 Brown LM. Helicobacter pylori: Epidemiology and routes of transmission. Epidemiol Rev 2000; 22: 283-297. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a018040
43 Mocanu V, Dang JT, Switzer N. , et al. The Effect of Helicobacter pylori on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2018; 28: 567-573. doi:10.1007/s11695-017-3024-8
44 Amor IB, Petrucciani N, Kassir R. et al. Midterm Outcomes of Gastric Pouch Resizing for Weight Regain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 2723-2728. doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04560-x
45 Debs T, Frey S, Petrucciani N. et al. Combined Laparoscopic Revision of the Gastric Pouch and Distalization of the Roux Limb After Failure of Weight Loss Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 2851-2853. doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04476-6
46 Chiappetta S, Weiner R. Was macht den Mini‑/One-anastomosis-gastric-Bypass zu einem Standardverfahren? – Evidenz zur Einschlingenrekonstruktion. Der Chirurg 2018; 89: 589-596. doi:10.1007/s00104-018-0663-9
47 Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W. et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 20-28. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000167762.46568.98
48 Mustafa A, Rizkallah NNH, Samuel N. et al. Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis (loop) gastric bypass for obesity: A prospective comparative study of weight loss and complications. Annal Med Surg 2020; 55: (2012): 143-147. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.040
49 Kraljević M, Delko T, Köstler T. et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic mini gastric bypass in the treatment of obesity: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18: 226. doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1957-9
50 Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M. et al. Efficacy of Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 152852. doi:10.1155/2015/152852
51 Stoica L, Dobrescu A, Isaic A. et al. Metabolic and Hormonal Changes after Sleeve Gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass in a Rat Model of Induced Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity. Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania: 1990) 2019; 114: 732-738. doi:10.21614/chirurgia.114.6.732.
52 Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-Year Clinical Audit of 1107 Cases Comparing Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Mini-Gastric Bypass, to Determine an Effective and Safe Bariatric and Metabolic Procedure. Obes Surg 2016; 26: 926-932. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2
53 Gu L, Huang X, Li S. et al. A meta-analysis of the medium- and long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. BMC Surg 2020; 20: 30. doi:10.1186/s12893-020-00695-x
54 Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses-first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg 2014; 24: 1430-1435. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1220-3
55 Csendes A, Burgos AM, Smok G. et al. Latest results (12-21 years) of a prospective randomized study comparing Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a partial gastrectomy plus vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 189-194. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181921aa1
56 Runkel M, Esophago-Gastric RN. Cancer after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB). Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania: 1990) 2019; 114: 686-692. doi:10.21614/chirurgia.114.6.686.
57 Braghetto I, Csendes A. SINGLE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS (ONE ANASTOMOSIS GASTRIC BYPASS OR MINI GASTRIC BYPASS): THE EXPERIENCE WITH BILLROTH II MUST BE CONSIDERED AND IS A CHALLENGE FOR THE NEXT YEARS. Arquivos Brasileiros De Cirurgia Digestiva: ABCD = Braz Arch Digestive Surg 2017; 30: 267-271. doi:10.1590/0102-6720201700040010
58 Kassir R, Petrucciani N, Debs T. et al. Conversion of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) for Biliary Reflux Resistant to Medical Treatment: Lessons Learned from a Retrospective Series of 2780 Consecutive Patients Undergoing OAGB. Obes Surg 2020; 30: 2093-2098. doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04460-0
59 Harris LA, Kayser BD, Cefalo C. et al. Biliopancreatic Diversion Induces Greater Metabolic Improvement Than Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Cell Metab 2019; 30: 855-864. e853. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.09.002.
60 Elias K, Hedberg J, Sundbom M. Prevalence and impact of acid-related symptoms and diarrhea in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2020; 16: 520-527. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.020
61 Kermansaravi M, Kabir A, Pazouki A. 1-Year Follow-up of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Morbid Obese Patients: Efficacy and Concerns. Obes Surg. 2020 doi:10.1007/s11695-020-04781-0.
62 Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W. et al. Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2020 doi:10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.019.
63 Hering I, Stier C, Seyfried F. Bariatric surgery: Expectations and therapeutic goals-a contradiction?. Der Chirurg Zeitschrift Fur Alle Geb Der Operativen Medizen 2018; 89: 597-604. doi:10.1007/s00104-018-0662-x
64 Fischer L, Nickel F, Sander J. et al. Patient expectations of bariatric surgery are gender specific–a prospective, multicenter cohort study. Surg Obesity Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg 2014; 10: 516-523. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.040