Generation „Social Media“ – Nutzung moderner Medien zum Informationsgewinn bezüglich Sportverletzungen

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die Nutzung digitaler Medien ist in nahezu allen Bereich des täglichen Lebens zur Normalität geworden. Ziel dieser Arbeit war es zu analysieren, inwieweit verletzte Sportler Online-Medien nutzen, um Informationen über Sportverletzungen oder deren Prävention zu erhalten.

Material und Methoden Zwischen 07/2017 und 12/2019 wurden im Klettersport sowohl Freizeit- als auch Wettkampfsportler nach ihrer Nutzung verschiedener Medien mit Hinblick auf die Bereiche Sportmedizin und Prävention befragt.

Ergebnisse 488 Athleten wurden in die Studie eingeschlossen (70,9 % männlich, 29,1 % weiblich, 33,2 ± 10,3 (13–71) Jahre). 69,9 % der Athleten nutzen online verfügbare medizinische Inhalte, wobei die Videoplattform YouTube am häufigsten zur spezifischen Suche verwendet wird (24,4 %). Jüngere Athleten (< 30 Jahre) nutzen Videoplattformen deutlich häufiger als ältere Athleten (p = 0,011). Sportspezifische Literatur wird von der Altersgruppe 30.–50. Lebensjahr am häufigsten verwendet (37,4 %). Die Altersgruppe > 50 Jahre nutzt dieses Medium signifikant seltener (18,8 %; p = 0,013). Wettkampfathleten nutzen signifikant häufiger webbasierte medizinische Inhalte als Freizeitathleten (p = 0,005). Das generelle Interesse an Verletzungsprophylaxe ist groß, wobei Wettkampfathleten häufiger entsprechende Inhalte nutzen. Fast 9 % aller befragten Patienten begaben sich aufgrund ihrer Online-Recherchearbeit in eine entsprechende sportorthopädische Einrichtung.

Zusammenfassung Internetbasierte medizinische Informationen werden von 69,9 % der Athleten genutzt, die Videoplattform YouTube wird am häufigsten verwendet. Videoplattformen und sportspezifische Literatur werden von jüngeren Athleten deutlich häufiger als von älteren Athleten genutzt. Webbasierte medizinische Inhalte werden von Wettkampfathleten signifikant häufiger aufgerufen als von Freizeitathleten. Das generelle Interesse an Verletzungsprophylaxe ist groß, wobei Wettkampfathleten häufiger entsprechende Inhalte nutzen bzw. suchen.

Abstract

Background Digital media have found their way into almost all areas of daily life. The aim of this study was to analyse the extent to which injured athletes use online media to gather information on sports injuries or on how to prevent them.

Material and methods Between 07–2017 and 12–2019, both recreational and competitive climbing athletes were surveyed on their use of various media with regard to sports medicine and prevention.

Results 488 athletes were included in the study (70.9 % male, 29.1 % female, 33.2 ± 10.3 (13–71) years of age). 69.9 % of the athletes use web-based medical content, with the video platform YouTube being most frequently used for specific searches (24.4 %). Younger athletes (< 30y) use video platforms significantly more often than older athletes (p = 0.011). Sports-specific literature is most frequently used by the age group 30–50 years (37.4 %). The age group > 50 uses this medium significantly less frequently (18.8 %; p = 0.013). Competitive athletes use web-based medical content significantly more often than recreational athletes (p = 0.005). The general interest in injury prevention is high, with competitive athletes using relevant content more often. Almost 9 % of all patients interviewed visited a sports-orthopaedic facility because of their online research work.

Summary Internet-based medical information is used by 69.9 % of athletes, with the video platform YouTube being most frequently used. Video platforms and sports-specific literature are used significantly more often by younger athletes than by older athletes. Web-based medical content is accessed significantly more often by professional athletes than by recreational athletes. The general interest in injury prophylaxis is high, with competitive athletes using or browsing medical content more often.

Schlüsselwörter

soziale Medien - Sportmedizin - Ökonomie - Gesundheitssystem

Key words

social media - sports medicine - economics - health system

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. April 2021

• Literatur

• 1 Cumps E, Verhagen E, Annemans L. et al. Injury rate and socioeconomic costs resulting from sports injuries in Flanders: data derived from sports insurance statistics 2003. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 767-772
• 2 Polinder S, Haagsma J, Panneman M. et al. The economic burden of injury: Health care and productivity costs of injuries in the Netherlands. Accid Anal Prev 2016; 93: 92-100
• 3 Baumann ECF. „Erst mal Doktor Google fragen? Nutzung neuer Medien zur Information und zum Austausch über Gesundheitsthemen“. Gütersloh: Böcken, B. Braun und R. Meierjürgen; 2015
• 4 Waller MC, Kerr DA, Binnie MJ. et al. Supplement Use and Behaviors of Athletes Affiliated With an Australian State-Based Sports Institute. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2019; 29: 518-525
• 5 Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris PR. et al. How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 1853-1862
• 6 Swallow JS, Joseph JR, Willsey K. et al. Online postconcussion return-to-play instructions. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018; 21: 44-48
• 7 Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES. et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26: 840-845
• 8 OʼBrien J, Finch CF. Injury Prevention Exercise Programs for Professional Soccer: Understanding the Perceptions of the End-Users. Clin J Sport Med 2017; 27: 1-9
• 9 Barreto JE, Whitehair CL. Social Media and Web Presence for Patients and Professionals: Evolving Trends and Implications for Practice. PM R 2017; 9: S98-S105
• 10 Volker P, Andelfinger TH. eHealth : Wie Smartphones, Apps und Wearables die Gesundheitsversorgung verändern werden. Springer Gabler Verlag; 2016
• 11 Kulzer B. Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung: Im digitalenZeitalter grundlegend verändert. Perspektiven der Diabetologie 2/2015. Dtsch Arztebl 2015; 43: 20 www.aerzteblatt.de/lit4315
• 12 Schöffl V, Morrison A, Hefti U. et al. The UIAA Medical Commission injury classification for mountaineering and climbing sports. Wilderness Environ Med 2011; 22: 46-51
• 13 Freeman JL, Caldwell PHY, Bennett PA. et al. How Adolescents Search for and Appraise Online Health Information: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr 2018; 195: 244-255.e1
• 14 Denecke K, Bamidis P, Bond C. et al. Ethical Issues of Social Media Usage in Healthcare. Yearb Med Inform 2015; 10: 137-147
• 15 NW 1615 L. St, Suite 800Washington, Inquiries D 20036USA202-419-4300 | M-857-8562 | F-419-4372 | M. Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Center. Im Internet: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/
• 16 Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 2002; 287: 2869-2871
• 17 White RW, Horvitz E. Experiences with web search on medical concerns and self diagnosis. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009; 2009: 696-700
• 18 Tang H, Ng JHK. Googling for a diagnosis--use of Google as a diagnostic aid: internet based study. BMJ 2006; 333: 1143-1145
• 19 Harris PR, Sillence E, Briggs P. Perceived threat and corroboration: key factors that improve a predictive model of trust in internet-based health information and advice. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e51
• 20 Dalmer NK. Questioning reliability assessments of health information on social media. J Med Libr Assoc 2017; 105: 61-68
• 21 Fung IC-H, Blankenship EB, Ahweyevu JO. et al. Public Health Implications of Image-Based Social Media: A Systematic Review of Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Flickr. Perm J 2020; 24: 18.307
• 22 Drozd B, Couvillon E, Suarez A. Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review. JMIR Med Educ 2018; 4: e3
• 23 Williams D, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG. et al. Big hits on the small screen: an evaluation of concussion-related videos on YouTube. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 107-111
• 24 Nankervis B, Ferguson L, Gosling C. et al. How do professional Australian Football League (AFL) players utilise social media during periods of injury? A mixed methods analysis. J Sci Med Sport 2018; 21: 681-685
• 25 Zazzera E. Use of Social Media for Injury Prevention: An Integrative Review. J Trauma Nurs 2020; 27: 13-28
• 26 Verhagen E, van Nassau F. Implementation science to reduce the prevalence and burden of MSK disorders following sport and exercise-related injury. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2019; 33: 188-201
• 27 Varady NH, Chandawarkar AA, Kernkamp WA. et al. Who should you be following? The top 100 social media influencers in orthopaedic surgery. World J Orthop 2019; 10: 327-338
• 28 Aydin MA, Gokcen HB. Factors considered by patients in provider selection for elective specialty surgery: A questionnaire-based survey. Int J Surg 2019; 69: 43-48
• 29 Hanzel T, Richards J, Schwitters P. et al. #DocsOnTwitter: How Physicians use Social Media to Build Social Capital. Hosp Top 2018; 96: 9-17
• 30 Smailhodzic E, Hooijsma W, Boonstra A. et al. Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 442
• 31 Gijsen V, Maddux M, Lavertu A. et al. #Science: The Potential and the Challenges of Utilizing Social Media and Other Electronic Communication Platforms in Health Care. Clin Transl Sci 2020; 13: 26-30
• 32 Roth C, Mazières A, Menezes T. Tubes and bubbles topological confinement of YouTube recommendations. PLoS ONE 2020; 15: e0231703
• 33 Fourcade M, Johns F. Loops, ladders and links: the recursivity of social and machine learning. Theory Soc 2020 Aug 26: 1–30