Download PDF
Ultraschall Med 2021; 42(05): 541-550
DOI: 10.1055/a-1452-9898
Guidelines & Recommendations

Dopplersonografie in der Schwangerschaft – Qualitätsanforderungen der DEGUM und klinischer Einsatz (Teil 2)

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Renaldo Faber
1   Leipzig, Center of Prenatal Medicine, Leipzig, Germany
,
Kai-Sven Heling
2   Praxis, prenetal diagnosis and human genetics, Berlin, Germany
,
Horst Steiner
3   Praxis für Pränatalmedizin, Salzburg, Austria
,
Ulrich Gembruch
4   Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Im 2. Teil zum Einsatz der Methode der Dopplersonografie in der Pränatal- und Geburtsmedizin geht es um den klinischen Einsatz. Die Erwartungen einer breiten Anwendung der Methode als Screeningverfahren haben sich nicht bestätigt. Allerdings spielen die Widerstandsindizes der Aa. uterinae im Rahmen eines multimodalen Ansatzes für die Vorhersage der Präeklampsie im 1. Trimester eine wichtige Rolle, verbessern die Genauigkeit und schaffen die Grundlage für eine effektive Prophylaxe mit Aspirin. Für die Zustandsdiagnostik und Überwachung wachstumsretardierter Föten im 2. und 3. Trimester hat die Dopplersonografie der A. umbilicalis, A. cerebri media und des Ductus venosus eine herausragende Bedeutung. Insbesondere die Hämodynamik des Ductus venosus ist ein entscheidendes Kriterium für das Geburtsmanagement der frühen, schweren IUGR vor 34 SSW. Die maximale Geschwindigkeit in der A. cerebri media ist der zentrale Parameter in der fetalen Anämiediagnostik und hat deren Qualität grundlegend verändert und verbessert. Allerdings sind diese Verbesserungen an eine hohe methodische Qualität der Messung gekoppelt. Dies alles trifft natürlich auch für Zwillinge und höhergradige Mehrlinge zu. Die differenzierte Diagnostik spezifischer Komplikationen von monochorialen Mehrlingen wie FFTS, TAPS und TRAP ist ohne den Einsatz der Dopplersonografie nicht mehr zu denken. Der Erfolg des vielfältigen Einsatzes der Dopplersonografie ist verknüpft mit exakter methodischer Anwendung und präziser pathophysiologischer Interpretation.

Key words

dopplersonography - fetal surveillance - guideline - clinical application


Publication History

Received: 27 February 2021

Accepted: 16 March 2021

Article published online:
27 April 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Faber R, Heling KS, Steiner H. et al. Dopplersonografie in der Schwangerschaft – Qualitätsanforderungen der DEGUM und klinischer Einsatz (Teil 1). Ultraschall in Med 2019; 40: 319-325
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Harrington K, Cooper D, Lees C. et al. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine arteries: the importance of bilateral notching in the prediction of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 182-188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Albaiges G, Missfelder-Lobos H, Lees C. et al. One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 559-564
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Garcia B, Llurba E, Valle L. et al. Do knowledge of uterine artery resistance in the second trimester and targeted surveillance improve maternal and perinatal outcome? UTOPIA study: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 680-689
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Papageorghiou A, Yu C, Bindra R. et al. Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction by transvaginal uterine artery Doppler at 23 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18: 441-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pedrosa AC, Matias A. Screening for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review of tests combining uterine artery Doppler with other markers. J Perinat Med 2011; 39: 619-635
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Singh T, Leslie K, Bhide A. et al. Role of second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in assessing stillbirth risk. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119: 256-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Stampalija T, Gyte GLM, Alfirevic Z. Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2010: CD008363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bahado-Singh RO, Jodicke C. Uterine Artery Doppler in First-trimester Pregnancy Screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010; 53: 879-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Poon L. et al. Competing risks model in early screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013; 33: 8-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Poon LC, Nicolaides K. Early Prediction of Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014; 2014: 297-307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva Costa F. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 53: 7-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y. et al. Prevention of Preeclampsia and Intrauterine Growth Restriction With Aspirin Started in Early Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 402-414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Roberge S, Villa P, Nicolaides K. et al. Early administration of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of preterm and term preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2012; 31: 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC. et al. Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 613-622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Khalil A, Nicolaides K. How to record uterine artery Doppler in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 478-479
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gomez O, Figueras F, Martinez J. et al. Sequential changes in uterine artery blood flow pattern between the first and second trimesters of gestation in relation to pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 802-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gallo DM, Wright D, Casanova C. et al. Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 19–24 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 619-627
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GML. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: CD001450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Prefumo F, Guven M, Ganapathy R. et al. The longitudinal variation in uterine artery blood flow pattern in relation to birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 764-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Khalil A, Garcia-Mandujano R, Maiz N. et al. Longitudinal changes in uterine artery Doppler and blood pressure and risk of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 541-547
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bakalis S, Stoilov B, Akolekar R. et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 30–34 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 707-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Li N, Ghosh G, Gudmundsson S. Uterine artery Doppler in high-risk pregnancies at 23–24 gestational weeks is of value in predicting adverse outcome of pregnancy and selecting cases for more intense surveillance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93: 1276-1281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine F. et al. Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 13-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte G. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013: CD007529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Turan OM, Turan S, Gungor S. et al. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32: 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Baschat AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 501-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Figueras F, Gratacos E. Stage-based approach to the management of fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 655-659
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A. et al. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet 2015; 385: 2162-2172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kehl S, Dötsch J, Hecher K. et al. Intrauterine Growth Restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2017; 77: 1157-1173
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Kennedy H. et al. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 430-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Miranda J, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Triunfo S. et al. Prediction of fetal growth restriction using estimated fetal weight vs a combined screening model in the third trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 603-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Baschat AA, Gembruch U. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 124-127
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Oros D, Figueras F, Cruz-Martinez R. et al. Longitudinal changes in uterine, umbilical and fetal cerebral Doppler indices in late-onset small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 191-195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Figueras F, Savchev S, Triunfo S. et al. An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 279-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bakalis S, Akolekar R, Gallo DM. et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler at 30–34 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 45: 409-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, Gallo DM. et al. Umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteryDoppler at 35–37 weeks’ gestation in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 82-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E. et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 454-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mari G, Deter RL, Carpenter RL. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal redcell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Picklesimer AH, Oepkes D, Moise A. et al. Determinants of the middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 526.e1-526.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mari G, Hanif F, Kruger M. et al. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: a new Doppler parameter in the assessment of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 310-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Kempe A, Rösing B, Berg C. et al. First-trimester treatment of fetal anemia secondary to parvovirus B19 infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29: 226-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hellmund A, Berg C, Geipel A. et al. Early intrauterine transfusion in fetuses with severe anemia caused by parvovirus B19 infection. Fetal Diagn Ther 2018; 43: 129-137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Oepkes D, Seaward PG, Vandenbussche FP. et al. DIAMOND Study Group: Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 156-164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Pretlove SJ, Fox CE, Khan KS. et al. Noninvasive methods of detecting fetal anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2009; 116: 1558-1567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Scheffer PG, van der Schoot CE, Page-Christiaens GC. et al. Noninvasive fetal blood group genotyping of rhesus D, c, E and of K in alloimmunised pregnant women: evaluation of a 7-year clinical experience. BJOG 2011; 118: 1340-1348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Moise Jr KJ, Argoti PS. Management and prevention of red cell alloimmunization in pregnancy: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1132-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Mari G, Norton ME, Stone J. et al. Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SFMF) Clinical Guideline #8: the fetus at risk for anemia – diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 697-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Detti L, Oz U, Guney I. et al. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses: Doppler ultrasound velocimetry for timing the second intrauterine transfusion in fetuses with anemia from red cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1048-1051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Scheier M, Hernandez-Andrade E, Fonseca EB. et al. Prediction of severe fetal anemia in red blood cell alloimmunization after previous intrauterine transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1550-1556
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Dodd JM, Andersen C, Dickinson JE. et al. MCA Doppler Study Group. Fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler to time intrauterine transfusion in red-cell alloimmunization: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 51: 306-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Garabedian C, Vaast P, Behal H. et al. Management of severe fetal anemia by Doppler measurement of middle cerebral artery: are there other benefits than reducing invasive procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 192: 27-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lam YH, Tang MH. Middle cerebral artery Doppler study in fetuses with homozygous alpha-thalassaemia-1 at 12–13 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn 2002; 22: 56-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Leung TY, Lao TT. Thalassaemia in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012; 26: 37-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Vaisbuch E. et al. Parvovirus B19 infection in human pregnancy. BJOG 2011; 118: 175-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 de Jong EP, Lindenburg IT, van Klink JM. et al. Intrauterine transfusion for parvovirus B19 infection: long-term neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206: 204.e1-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Cosmi E, Mari G, Delle Chiaie L. et al. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia resulting from parvovirus infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1290-1293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Amann C, Geipel A, Müller A. et al. Fetal anemia of unknown cause – a diagnostic challenge. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32 (Suppl. 02) E115-E121
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Wylie BJ, D’Alton ME. Fetomaternal hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 1039-1051
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Tamblyn JA, Norton A, Spurgeon L. et al. Prenatal therapy in transient abnormal myelopoiesis: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 101: F67-F71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 47: 247-263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Geipel A, Berg C, Germer U. et al. Doppler assessment of the uterine circulation in the second trimester in twin pregnancies: prediction of pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and birth weight discordance. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 541-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Fisk NM, Duncombe GJ, Sullivan M. The basic and clinical science of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Placenta 2009; 30: 379-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Allen MH. et al. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 550-555
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M. et al. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 136-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Slaghekke F, Kist WJ, Oepkes D. et al. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010; 27: 181-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Slaghekke F, Lewi L, Middeldorp JM. et al. Residual anastomoses in twin-twin transfusion syndrome after laser: the Solomon randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 285.e1–e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 van Winden KR, Quintero RA, Kontopoulos EV. et al. Pre-operative twin anemia/polycythemia in the setting of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). Fetal Diagn Ther 2015; 37: 274-280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Slaghekke F, Pasman S, Veujoz M. et al. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity to predict fetal hemoglobin levels in twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015; 46: 432-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Tollenaar LSA, Lopriore E, Middeldorp JM. et al. Improved antenatal prediction of twin anemia-polycythemia sequence by delta middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: a new antenatal classification system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 788-793
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Tavares de Sousa M, Fonseca A, Hecher K. Role of fetal intertwin difference in middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in predicting neonatal twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 794-797
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lewi L, Valencia C, Gonzales E. et al. The outcome of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence diagnosed in the first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 213.e1–4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 von Kaisenberg CS, Klaritsch P, Ochsenbein-Kölble N. et al. AWMF LL 015-087 S24. Überwachung und Betreuung von Zwillingsschwangerschaften.
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Gratacos E, Lewi L, Munoz B. et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Mackie FL, Rigby A, Morris RK. et al. Prognosis of the co-twin following spontaneous single intrauterine fetal death in twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2019; 126: 569-578
    PubMedGoogle Scholar