Digital single-operator cholangioscope for endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy

Abstract

Background This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of a digital single-operator cholangioscope (SOC) system for endoscopic management of acute appendicitis.

Methods 14 patients with acute uncomplicated simple or supportive appendicitis were evaluated between November 2018 and September 2020. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by direct colonoscopy imaging and cholangioscope. The success rate of digital SOC-assisted endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), the procedure time, postoperative length of hospital stay, complications, and recurrence rate were recorded.

Results Technical success rate was 100 %, with high quality imaging of the appendiceal cavity achieved using SOC in all 14 patients. The mean procedure time was 37.8 (standard deviation [SD] 22) minutes. All patients experienced immediate relief from abdominal pain after the procedure. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 1.9 (SD 0.7) days. No recurrence occurred during 2–24 months of follow-up.

Conclusion Digital SOC-assisted ERAT provided a feasible, safe, and effective alternative approach for diagnosis and management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis without the need for X-ray or ultrasonic guidance.

• References

• 1 Liu BR, Song JT, Han FY. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 862-866
• 2 Ye LP, Mao XL, Yang H. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis techniques for the treatment of patients with acute appendicitis. Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56: 899-904
• 3 Liu BR, Ma X, Feng J. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT): a multicenter retrospective study in China. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 905-909
• 4 Li Y, Mi C, Li W. et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis by endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT): combination of colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde appendicography. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 3285-3291
• 5 Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P. et al. Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33: 430-432
• 6 Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S. et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015; 386: 1278-1287
• 7 Seetagal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC. et al. Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 433-437
• 8 Ambe PC. Negative appendectomy. It is really preventable?. J Invest Surg 2019; 32: 474-475
• 9 Maloney C, Edelman MC, Bolognese AC. et al. The impact of pathological criteria on pediatric negative appendectomy rate. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54: 1794-1799
• 10 Jeon BG. Predictive factors and outcomes of negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 2017; 213: 731-738
• 11 Kang J, Zhang W, Zeng L. et al. The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Surg Endosc 2020;
• 12 Podda M, Serventi F, Mortola L. et al. A prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter trial comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients with Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA study). Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 1649-1660