J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84(02): 136-142
DOI: 10.1055/a-1757-0328
Original Article

A Comparison of Outcomes Using Combined Intra- and Extradural versus Extradural-Only Repair of Tegmen Defects

1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Glen D'Souza
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Ellina Hattar-Medina
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Michael Karsy
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Rebecca C. Chiffer
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Thomas O. Willcox
2   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Christopher J. Farrell
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
James J. Evans
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Tegmen tympani or tegmen mastoideum defects involve dehiscence of the temporal bone that can be a source of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) otorrhea. Herein, we compare a combined intra-/extradural repair strategy with an extradural-only repair as it pertains to surgical and clinical outcomes.

Design A retrospective review from our institution was performed of patients with tegmen defects requiring surgical intervention.

Participants Patients with tegmen defects who underwent surgery (combined transmastoid and middle fossa craniotomy) for repair of tegmen defects between 2010 and 2020 were inclined in this study.

Results A total of 60 patients with 40 intra-/extradural (mean follow-up time: 1,060 ± 1,103 days) and 20 extradural-only (mean follow-up time: 519 ± 369 days) repairs were identified. No major differences in demographic factors or presenting symptoms were identified between the two cohorts. There was no difference in hospital length of stay between the two patient cohorts (mean: 4.15 vs. 4.35 days, p = 0.8). In the extradural-only repair technique, synthetic bone cement was more frequently used (100 vs. 7.5%, p < 0.01), whereas in the combined intra-/extradural repair, synthetic dural substitute was used more often (80 vs. 35%, p < 0.01), with similar successful surgical outcomes achieved. Despite disparities in the techniques and materials used for repair, there were no differences in complication rates (wound infection, seizures, and ossicular fixation), 30-day readmission rates, or persistent CSF leak between the two treatment cohorts.

Conclusion The results of this study suggest no difference in clinical outcomes between combined intra-/extradural versus extradural-only repair of tegmen defects. A simplified extradural-only repair strategy can be effective, and may reduce the morbidity of intradural reconstruction (seizures, stroke, and intraparenchymal hemorrhage).



Publication History

Received: 08 June 2021

Accepted: 28 January 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
01 February 2022

Article published online:
11 April 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Wahba H, Ibrhaim S, Youssef TA. Management of iatrogenic tegmen plate defects: our clinical experience and surgical technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270 (09) 2427-2431
  • 2 Carlson ML, Copeland III WR, Driscoll CL. et al. Temporal bone encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid fistula repair utilizing the middle cranial fossa or combined mastoid-middle cranial fossa approach. J Neurosurg 2013; 119 (05) 1314-1322
  • 3 Blioskas S, Magras I, Polyzoidis S. et al. Repair of temporal bone encephalocele following canal wall down mastoidectomy. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2014; 2014: 271824
  • 4 Jackson CG, Pappas Jr DG, Manolidis S. et al. Brain herniation into the middle ear and mastoid: concepts in diagnosis and surgical management. Am J Otol 1997; 18 (02) 198-205 , discussion 205–206
  • 5 Brown NE, Grundfast KM, Jabre A, Megerian CA, O'Malley Jr BW, Rosenberg SI. Diagnosis and management of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid-middle ear effusion and otorrhea. Laryngoscope 2004; 114 (05) 800-805
  • 6 Gubbels SP, Selden NR, Delashaw Jr JB, McMenomey SO. Spontaneous middle fossa encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage: diagnosis and management. Otol Neurotol 2007; 28 (08) 1131-1139
  • 7 May JS, Mikus JL, Matthews BL, Browne JD. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea from defects of the temporal bone: a rare entity?. Am J Otol 1995; 16 (06) 765-771
  • 8 Cheng E, Grande D, Leonetti J. Management of spontaneous temporal bone cerebrospinal fluid leak: a 30-year experience. Am J Otolaryngol 2019; 40 (01) 97-100
  • 9 Sanna M, Fois P, Russo A, Falcioni M. Management of meningoencephalic herniation of the temporal bone: personal experience and literature review. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (08) 1579-1585
  • 10 Braca III JA, Marzo S, Prabhu VC. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage from tegmen tympani defects repaired via the middle cranial fossa approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74 (02) 103-107
  • 11 Wind JJ, Caputy AJ, Roberti F. Spontaneous encephaloceles of the temporal lobe. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 25 (06) E11
  • 12 Ramalingam KK, Ramalingam R, SreenivasaMurthy TM, Chandrakala GR. Management of temporal bone meningo-encephalocoele. J Laryngol Otol 2008; 122 (11) 1168-1174
  • 13 Kamiya K, Mori H, Kunimatsu A, Kawai K, Usami K, Ohtomo K. Two cases of spontaneous temporal encephalocele. J Neuroradiol 2012; 39 (05) 360-363
  • 14 Glasscock III ME, Dickins JR, Jackson CG, Wiet RJ, Feenstra L. Surgical management of brain tissue herniation into the middle ear and mastoid. Laryngoscope 1979; 89 (11) 1743-1754
  • 15 Kari E, Mattox DE. Transtemporal management of temporal bone encephaloceles and CSF leaks: review of 56 consecutive patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2011; 131 (04) 391-394
  • 16 Savva A, Taylor MJ, Beatty CW. Management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks involving the temporal bone: report on 92 patients. Laryngoscope 2003; 113 (01) 50-56
  • 17 McNulty B, Schutt CA, Bojrab D, Babu S. Middle cranial fossa encephalocele and cerebrospinal fluid leakage: etiology, approach, outcomes. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81 (03) 268-274
  • 18 Walia A, Lander D, Durakovic N, Shew M, Wick CC, Herzog J. Outcomes after mini-craniotomy middle fossa approach combined with mastoidectomy for lateral skull base defects. Am J Otolaryngol 2021; 42 (01) 102794
  • 19 Jeevan DS, Ormond R, Kim AH. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks and encephaloceles of temporal bone origin: nuances to diagnosis and management. World Neurosurg 2015; 83 (04) 560-566
  • 20 Kenning TJ, Willcox TO, Artz GJ, Schiffmacher P, Farrell CJ, Evans JJ. Surgical management of temporal meningoencephaloceles, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and intracranial hypertension: treatment paradigm and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 32 (06) E6
  • 21 Kurtzhals C, Hansen K, Kondziella D. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurol India 2011; 59 (06) 946-947
  • 22 Hoang S, Ortiz Torres MJ, Rivera AL, Litofsky NS. Middle cranial fossa approach to repair tegmen defects with autologous or alloplastic graft. World Neurosurg 2018; 118: e10-e17
  • 23 Patel A, Zakaria J, Bartindale MR. et al. Fetal bovine collagen grafts for repair of tegmen defects and encephaloceles via middle cranial fossa approach. Ear Nose Throat J 2021; 100 (3_suppl): 347S-351S