Computer-aided detection is here: will computer-aided quality algorithms soon follow?

Endoscopy 2022; 54(08): 769-770
DOI: 10.1055/a-1798-0154

Editorial

Referring to Yao L et al. p. 757–768

Authors

Sarah K. McGill

Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

References
1 Koo CS, Dolgunov D, Koh CJ. Key tips for using computer-aided diagnosis in colonoscopy – observations from two different platforms. Endoscopy 2021; 53
2 McGill SK, Rosenman J, Wang R. et al. Artificial intelligence identifies and quantifies colonoscopy blind spots. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1284-1286
3 Yao L, Zhang L, Liu J. et al. Effect of an artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system on efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a four-group parallel study. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 757-768
4 Gong D, Wu L, Zhang J. et al. Detection of colorectal adenomas with a real-time computer-aided system (ENDOANGEL): a randomised controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 352-361
5 Shaukat A, Rector TS, Church TR. et al. Longer withdrawal time is associated with a reduced incidence of interval cancer after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 952-957
6 Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA. et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 352-359
7 Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 33-36
8 Rex DK, Repici A, Gross SA. et al. High-definition colonoscopy versus Endocuff versus EndoRings versus full-spectrum endoscopy for adenoma detection at colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 335-344