Erhöhung der Sicherheit in der mikrochirurgischen
                    Brustrekonstruktion – Technik und Technologie

Amir Khosrow Bigdeli; Arash Momeni; Ulrich Kneser

doi:10.1055/a-1858-5214

Handchirurgie · Mikrochirurgie · Plastische Chirurgie, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2022; 54(04): 314-325
DOI: 10.1055/a-1858-5214

Originalarbeit

Erhöhung der Sicherheit in der mikrochirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion – Technik und Technologie

Increasing Safety in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction – Technique and Technology

Autor*innen

Amir Khosrow Bigdeli

¹Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie – Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany

²Klinik für Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Arash Momeni

³Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
Ulrich Kneser

¹Klinik für Hand-, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie – Schwerbrandverletztenzentrum BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany

²Klinik für Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie der Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Die mikrochirurgische Rekonstruktion mit freien Lappenplastiken hat sich als Standardverfahren in der Brustrekonstruktion etabliert. Dabei kann heute mit Hilfe des freien Gewebetransfers eine natürliche und ästhetisch anspruchsvolle Rekonstruktion der weiblichen Brust auch nach modifizierter radikaler Mastektomie und Bestrahlung erreicht werden. In den letzten Jahrzehnten wurden die mikrochirurgischen Techniken weitgehend standardisiert. Zahlreiche neue Entnahmestellen und Lappenplastiken wurden beschrieben, die entsprechend der lokalen Gewebeverfügbarkeit eine individualisierte Rekonstruktion mit großer Patientinnenzufriedenheit ermöglichen. Infolgedessen hat sich der Fokus der mikrochirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion vom reinen „Lappenüberleben“ hin zur Maximierung des ästhetischen Ergebnisses auch unter Berücksichtigung der Hebedefektmorbidität verlagert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden aktuelle Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet mit einem besonderen Fokus auf Operationstechniken und Technologien, die dazu beitragen, die Sicherheit der mikrochirurgischen Brustrekonstruktion zu erhöhen, beschrieben.

Abstract

Microsurgical reconstruction has established itself as a standard procedure in breast reconstruction as it permits creation of a natural and aesthetically appealing breast mound, even after modified radical mastectomy and radiation. In the past few decades numerous new free flap donor-sites have been described that permit an individualized approach to reconstruction, thus, resulting in a high level of patient satisfaction. Paralleling these technical innovations, the focus of microsurgical breast reconstruction has shifted from mere “flap success” to “aesthetic outcome”, while also taking into account the respective donor-site morbidity. Here, the authors discuss contemporary developments in the field with a particular focus on surgical techniques and technologies that contribute to increasing the safety of microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Schlüsselwörter

Mikrochirurgische Brustrekonstruktion - Mikrochirurgie - freier Gewebetransfer

Key words

microsurgical breast reconstruction - microsurgery - free tissue transfer

Volltext

Referenzen

Literatur
1 Champaneria MC, Wong WW, Hill ME. et al. The evolution of breast reconstruction: A historical perspective. World J Surg 2012; 36: 730-742
2 Dibbs R, Trost J, Degregorio V. et al. Free Tissue Breast Reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2019; 33: 59-66
3 Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Deconstructing the reconstruction: Evaluation of process and efficiency in deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 717E-724E
4 Keck M, Bergmann PA, Deindl P. et al. How well are patients informed on the websites of German university breast centres about the possibilities of breast reconstruction?. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, Plast Chir Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripher Nerven und Gefasse Organ der V. 2020; 52: 83-87
5 Ardehali B, Morritt AN, Jain A. Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67: 752-755
6 O’Connor EF, Rozen WM, Chowdhry M. et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg 2016; 5: 88-92
7 Kulkarni AR, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL. et al. Venous Thrombosis in Handsewn versus Coupled Venous Anastomoses in 857 Consecutive Breast Free Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32: 178-182
8 McLaughlin M, Porter BE, Cohen-Shohet R. et al. Safety of Coupled Arterial Anastomosis in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37: 132-135
9 Pafitanis G, Nicolaides M, O’Connor EF. et al. Microvascular anastomotic arterial coupling: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74: 1286-1302
10 Samargandi OA, Winter J, Corkum JP. et al. Comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipients for microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2017; 37: 937-946
11 Cook JA, Tholpady SS, Momeni A. et al. Predictors of internal mammary vessel diameter: A computed tomographic angiography-assisted anatomic analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 1340-1348
12 Nahabedian MY. The internal mammary artery and vein as recipient vessels for microvascular breast reconstruction: are we burning a future bridge?. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 311-316
13 Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM. et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1-6
14 Rozen WM, Ye X, Guio-Aguilar PL. et al. Autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting: an anatomical study and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 181-198
15 Vollbach FH, Heitmann CD, Fansa H. An appraisal of internal mammary artery perforators as recipient vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction-an analysis of 515 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open 2016; 4: 1-7
16 Healy C, Allen RJS. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30: 121-125
17 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32-38
18 Daar DA, Salibian AA, Frey JD. et al. Deconstructing the Reconstruction: Evaluation of Process and Efficiency in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147: 559e-560e
19 Mohan AT, Zhu L, Wang Z. et al. Techniques and Perforator Selection in Single, Dominant DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Algorithmic Approach to Maximize Efficiency and Safety. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 790e-803e
20 Serletti JM, Man LX, Selber JC. Abdominal wall following free TRAM or DIEP flap reconstruction: A meta-analysis and critical review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 752-764
21 Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K. et al. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 758-771
22 Uda H, Kamochi H, Sarukawa S. et al. Clinical and quantitative isokinetic comparison of abdominal morbidity and dynamics following DIEP versus muscle-sparing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140: 1101-1109
23 Tevlin R, Wan DC, Momeni A. Should free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps be considered a quality indicator in breast reconstruction?. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72: 1923-1929
24 Eisenhardt SU, Momeni A, Von Fritschen U. et al. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap – What is the current standard?: Consensus Paper of the German Working Party on the Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels. Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plast Chir 2018; 50: 248-255
25 Lindenblatt N, Gruenherz L, Farhadi J. A systematic review of donor site aesthetic and complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2019; 8: 389-398
26 Grünherz L, Keijzer W, Uyulmaz S. et al. Donor site aesthetics and morbidity after DIEP flap breast reconstruction-A retrospective multicenter study. Breast J 2020; 26: 1980-1986
27 Henn D, Sivaraj D, Barrera JA. et al. The Plane of Mesh Placement Does Not Impact Abdominal Donor Site Complications in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 87: 542-546
28 Siegwart LC, Sieber L, Fischer S. et al. The Use of Semi-Absorbable Mesh and its Impact on Donor-Site Morbidity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45: 907-916
29 Siegwart LC, Sieber L, Fischer S. et al. Influence of closed incision negative-pressure therapy on abdominal donor-site morbidity in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2020;
30 Akita S, Mitsukawa N, Tokumoto H. et al. Low-rise scar deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2015; 35: 451-456
31 Kotsougiani-Fischer D, Sieber L, Fischer S. et al. Safety of a Modified Lipoabdominoplasty Technique for Donor-Site Closure in Abdominal-Based Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45: 1431-1440
32 Fertsch S, Munder B, Andree C. et al. Risk Factor Analysis for Flap and Donor Site Related Complications in 1274 DIEP Flaps – Retrospective Single Center Study 2021; 116
33 Heidekrueger PI, Fritschen U, Moellhoff N. et al. Impact of body mass index on free DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2021; 74: 1718-1724
34 Prantl L, Moellhoff N, Fritschen UV. et al. Impact of smoking status in free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction: A multicenter study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36: 694-702
35 Ludolph I, Horch RE, Harlander M. et al. Is there a rationale for autologous breast reconstruction in older patients? A retrospective single center analysis of quality of life, complications and comorbidities after DIEP or ms-TRAM flap using the BREAST-Q. Breast J 2015; 21: 588-595
36 Dejean MF, Dabi Y, Goutard M. et al. Deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap in elderly women for breast reconstruction: The experience of a tertiary referral center and a literature review. Breast J 2021; 27: 700-705
37 Yousif NJ. The transverse gracilis musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 1993; 31: 382
38 Bodin F, Dissaux C, Dupret-Bories A. et al. The transverse musculo-cutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: How to avoid complications. Microsurgery 2016; 36: 42-48
39 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY. et al. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 16-23
40 Jo T, Kim EK, Eom JS. et al. Comparison of transverse upper gracilis and profunda femoris artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: A systematic review. Microsurgery 2020; 40: 916-928
41 Qian B, Xiong L, Li J. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Microsurgical Safety and Efficacy of Profunda Artery Perforator Flap in Breast Reconstruction. J Oncol 2019; 2019
42 Dayan JH, Allen RJ. Neurotized Diagonal Profunda Artery Perforator Flaps for Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open 2019; 7: e2463
43 Russe E, Kholosy H, Weitgasser L. et al. Autologous fat grafting for enhancement of breast reconstruction with a transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: A cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2018; 71: 1557-1562
44 Siegwart LC, Bolbos A, Tapking C. et al. Safety and donor site morbidity of the transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap in autologous breast reconstruction—A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124: 492-509
45 Christopoulos G, Sergentanis TN, Vlachogiorgos A. et al. The use of the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85: e66-e75
46 Salibian AA, Bekisz JM, Frey JD. et al. Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2021; 41: 240-249
47 Kim SY, Lee KT, Mun GH. Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Planning of Bipedicled DIEP Flaps with Intraflap Crossover Anastomosis: An Anatomical and Clinical Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138: 409e-418e
48 Hernandez Rosa J, Sherif RD, Torina PJ. et al. Use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70: 47-53
49 Tomouk T, Mohan AT, Azizi A. et al. Donor site morbidity in DIEP free flap breast reconstructions: A comparison of unilateral, bilateral, and bipedicled surgical procedure types. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70: 1505-1513
50 Momeni A, Kanchwala S. Hybrid Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Surgical Approach that Combines the Benefits of Autologous and Implant-Based Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142: 1109-1115
51 Hamdi M, Khuthaila DK, Van Landuyt K. et al. Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007; 60: 904
52 Elzinga K, Buchel E. The Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Un lambeau perforateur de l’artère iliaque circonflexe profonde pour la reconstruction mammaire. Plast Surg (Oakville, Ont) 2018; 26: 229-237
53 Beugels J, Vasile JV, Tuinder SMH. et al. The Stacked Hemiabdominal Extended Perforator Flap for Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142: 1424-1434
54 Rabey NG, Erel E, Malata CM. Double-pedicled abdominal free flap using an entirely new microvascular combination of DIEP and SIEA vascular pedicles for unilateral breast reconstruction: a novel addition to the Hamdi classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 767e-769e
55 Malata CM, Rabey NG. Decision Making in Double-Pedicled DIEP and SIEA Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstructions: An Algorithmic Approach and Comprehensive Classification. Front Surg 2015; 2: 49
56 Myers PL, Nelson JA, Allen RJ. Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2021; 10: 444-459
57 Mayo JL, Allen RJ, Sadeghi A. Four-flap Breast Reconstruction: Bilateral Stacked DIEP and PAP Flaps. Plast Reconstr surgery Glob open 2015; 3: e383
58 Haddock NT, Suszynski TM, Teotia SS. An Individualized Patient-centric Approach and Evolution towards Total Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction in an Academic Setting. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open 2020; 8: 1-6
59 Martinez CA, Fairchild B, Secchi-del Rio R. et al. Bilateral Outpatient Breast Reconstruction with Stacked DIEP and Vertical PAP Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open 2021; 9: e3878
60 Werdin F, Haug DM, Amr A. et al. Double transverse myocutaneous gracilis free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2016; 36: 539-545
61 Schmauss D, Beier JP, Eisenhardt SU. et al. The „safe“ flap – Preoperative perforator-mapping and intraoperative perfusion assessment to reduce flap-associated morbidity – Consensus statement of the German Speaking Working Group for Microsurgery of the Peripheral Nerves and Vessels. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, Plast Chir Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripher Nerven und Gefasse Organ der V 2019; 51: 410-417
62 Schrögendorfer KF, Nickl S, Keck M. et al. Viability of five different pre- and intraoperative imaging methods for autologous breast reconstruction. Eur Surg – Acta Chir Austriaca 2016; 48: 326-333
63 Rozen WM, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW. et al. Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 9-16
64 Mathes DW, Neligan PC. Preoperative imaging techniques for perforator selection in abdomen-based microsurgical breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37: 581-591
65 Rozen WM, Stella DL, Bowden J. et al. Advances in the pre-operative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps: magnetic resonance angiography. Microsurgery 2009; 29: 119-123
66 Rozen WM, Ashton MW. Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009; 33: 327-335
67 Haddock NT, Dumestre DO, Teotia SS. Efficiency in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: The real benefit of computed tomographic angiography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 719-723
68 Vasile JV, Levine JL. Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016; 5: 197-211
69 Macchi V, Vigato E, Porzionato A. et al. The gracilis muscle and its use in clinical reconstruction: an anatomical, embryological, and radiological study. Clin Anat 2008; 21: 696-704
70 Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY. et al. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 16e-23e
71 Agrawal MD, Thimmappa ND, Vasile JV. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction: preoperative magnetic resonance angiography for perforator flap vessel mapping. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31: 1-11
72 Haddock NT, Greaney P, Otterburn D. et al. Predicting perforator location on preoperative imaging for the profunda artery perforator flap. Microsurgery 2012; 32: 507-511
73 Thimmappa ND, Vasile JV, Ahn CY. et al. MRA of the skin: mapping for advanced breast reconstructive surgery. Clin Radiol 2019; 74: 13-28
74 Hennessy O, Potter SM. Use of infrared thermography for the assessment of free flap perforators in autologous breast reconstruction: A systematic review. JPRAS Open 2020; 23: 60-70
75 Rauh A, Henn D, Nagel SS. et al. Continuous Video-Rate Laser Speckle Imaging for Intra- and Postoperative Cutaneous Perfusion Imaging of Free Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019;
76 Zötterman J, Opsomer D, Farnebo S. et al. Intraoperative laser speckle contrast imaging in DIEP breast reconstruction: A prospective case series study. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open 2020; 1-7
77 Beier JP, Horch RE, Arkudas A. et al. Decision-making in DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps: The potential role for a combined laser Doppler spectrophotometry system. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2013; 66: 73-79
78 Bigdeli AK, Thomas B, Falkner F. et al. The Impact of Indocyanine-Green Fluorescence Angiography on Intraoperative Decision-Making and Postoperative Outcome in Free Flap Surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36: 556-566
79 Varela R, Casado-Sanchez C, Zarbakhsh S. et al. Outcomes of DIEP Flap and Fluorescent Angiography: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145: 1-10
80 Momeni A, Sheckter C. Intraoperative laser-assisted indocyanine green imaging can reduce the rate of fat necrosis in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 507E-513E
81 Hembd AS, Yan J, Zhu H. et al. Intraoperative Assessment of DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Using Indocyanine Green Angiography: Reduction of Fat Necrosis, Resection Volumes, and Postoperative Surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 1-10
82 Ludolph I, Bettray D, Beier JP. et al. Leaving the perfusion zones? Individualized flap design in 100 free DIEP and ms-TRAM flaps for autologous breast reconstruction using indocyanine green angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021;