Höher-intensive Bewegung im Alltag und ihr Potenzial für die Bewegungsförderung

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag betrachtet die Bedeutung von höher-intensiver Bewegung aus der Bewegungsförderungsperspektive. Da die Förderung von Alltagsaktivität im Gegensatz zu geplant-strukturierten und intensiven Trainingsprogrammen als niederschwellig angesehen wird, soll in diesem Übersichtsartikel erläutert werden, welches Potenzial Alltagsaktivität für höher-intensive Bewegung hat. Hierzu wird narrativ eruiert, welche unterschiedlichen Facetten Alltagsaktivität beinhaltet, inwiefern Alltagsaktivität höher- oder hoch intensiv sein kann und wie (intensive) Alltagsaktivität in der Bewegungsförderung stärker akzentuiert werden kann. Dabei wird ein besonderes Augenmerk auf aktuelle Bewegungsförderungsansätze der „Bewegungs-Snacks“ geworfen.

Abstract

This article explores in a narrative manner the relevance of vigorous-intensity physical activity (PA) from the PA promotion perspective. Since the promotion of incidental lifestyle PA is often considered as a low barrier in contrast to structured and vigorous exercise programs, the potential of incidental lifestyle PA for vigorous intensities is examined in this literature overview. For this purpose, the different elements of incidental lifestyle PA are introduced and to what extend incidental lifestyle PA may comprise of vigorous or very vigorous intensities. Furthermore, recent approaches are introduced, how (vigorous) incidental lifestyle PA may receive more focus in PA promotion. Particular attention is drawn to current PA promotion initiatives of PA snacks.

Stichworte

Alltagsaktivität - Bewegungs-Snacks - sedentärer Lebensstil

Key words

incidental lifestyle physical activity - physical activity snacks - sedentary lifestyle

• Literatur

• 1 Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F. et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012; 380: 219-229
• 2 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. In: Rubin D ed. Washington, DC. 2018
• 3 Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S. et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2020; 54: 1451-1462
• 4 Jakicic JM, Kraus WE, Powell KE. et al. Association between Bout Duration of Physical Activity and Health: Systematic Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019; 51: 1213-1219
• 5 Rütten A, Pfeifer K. Nationale Empfehlungen für Bewegung und Bewegungsförderung. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg. 2016
• 6 Finger JD, Mensink G, Lange C. et al. Gesundheitsfördernde körperliche Aktivität in der Freizeit bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland. 2017
• 7 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. In: Services USDoHaH ed. Washington, DC. 2008
• 8 Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM. et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Jama 2018; 320: 2020-2028
• 9 Ding D, Ramirez Varela A, Bauman AE. et al. Towards better evidence-informed global action: lessons learnt from the Lancet series and recent developments in physical activity and public health. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 462-468
• 10 Liubaoerjijin Y, Terada T, Fletcher K. et al. Effect of aerobic exercise intensity on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized trials. Acta diabetologica 2016; 53: 769-781
• 11 Wang Y, Nie J, Ferrari G. et al. Association of Physical Activity Intensity With Mortality: A National Cohort Study of 403 681 US Adults. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181: 203-211
• 12 Gebel K, Ding D, Bauman AE. Volume and intensity of physical activity in a large population-based cohort of middle-aged and older Australians: prospective relationships with weight gain, and physical function. Prev Med 2014; 60: 131-133
• 13 Gebel K, Ding D, Chey T. et al. Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity on All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged and Older Australians. JAMA Intern Med 2015; 970-977
• 14 Shiroma EJ, Sesso HD, Moorthy MV. et al. Do moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity physical activities reduce mortality rates to the same extent?. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e000802
• 15 Swain DP, Franklin BA. Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 141-147
• 16 Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE. et al. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1996-2001
• 17 Hoare E, Stavreski B, Jennings GL. et al. Exploring motivation and barriers to physical activity among active and inactive Australian adults. Sports 2017; 5: 47
• 18 Batacan RB, Duncan MJ, Dalbo VJ. et al. Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 494-503
• 19 Jelleyman C, Yates T, O’Donovan G. et al. The effects of high-intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2015; 16: 942-961
• 20 Costa EC, Hay JL, Kehler DS. et al. Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training On Blood Pressure in Adults with Pre- to Established Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Sports Med 2018; 48: 2127-2142
• 21 Wewege M, van den Berg R, Ward RE. et al. The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 635-646
• 22 Keating SE, Johnson NA, Mielke GI. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on body adiposity. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 943-964
• 23 Biddle SJH, Batterham AM. High-intensity interval exercise training for public health: a big HIT or shall we HIT it on the head?. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2015; 12: 95
• 24 Hardcastle SJ, Ray H, Beale L. et al. Why sprint interval training is inappropriate for a largely sedentary population. Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5
• 25 Gibala MJ, McGee SL. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain?. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2008; 36: 58-63
• 26 Gibson-Moore H. UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines 2019: What’s new and how can we get people more active?. Nutrition Bulletin 2019; 44: 320-328
• 27 Reynolds R, McKenzie S, Allender S. et al. Systematic review of incidental physical activity community interventions. Prev Med 2014; 67: 46-64
• 28 Stamatakis E, Johnson NA, Powell L. et al. Short and sporadic bouts in the 2018 US physical activity guidelines: is high-intensity incidental physical activity the new HIIT?. Br J Sports Med 2019; bjsports-2018-100397. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-100397
• 29 Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE. et al. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 128: 2259-2279
• 30 Sims J, Hill K, Hunt S. et al. National physical activity recommendations for older Australians: Discussion document. In: Ageing AGDoHa ed. Canberra. 2006
• 31 Wallmann-Sperlich B, Düking P, Müller M. et al. Type and intensity distribution of structured and incidental lifestyle physical activity of students and office workers: A retrospective content analysis. BMC Public Health accepted.
• 32 Jingjie W, Yang L, Jing Y. et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk of cardiovascular diseases in adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 286
• 33 Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M. et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2018; doi:10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
• 34 Ekelund U, Tarp J, Fagerland MW. et al. Joint associations of accelero-meter measured physical activity and sedentary time with all-cause mortality: a harmonised meta-analysis in more than 44 000 middle-aged and older individuals. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2020; 54: 1499-1506
• 35 Froböse I, Wallmann-Sperlich B. Der DKV-Report 2021 „Wie gesund lebt Deutschland?“. In: Krankenversicherung DD ed. Düsseldorf: DKV Deutsche Krankenversicherung. 2021
• 36 Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ. et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet 2016; 388: 1302-1310
• 37 Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J. et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4570
• 38 World Health Organization W. Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. In. Genf: World Health Organisation; 2020
• 39 Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Ding D. et al. Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2018; doi:10.1136/bjsports-2018-099131
• 40 Dempsey PC, Biddle SJH, Buman MP. et al. New global guidelines on sedentary behaviour and health for adults: broadening the behavioural targets. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2020; 17: 151
• 41 Buffey AJ, Herring MP, Langley CK. et al. The Acute Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting Time in Adults with Standing and Light-Intensity Walking on Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med 2022; doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01649-4
• 42 Sanders JP, Biddle SJH, Gokal K. et al. ‘Snacktivity™’ to increase physical activity: Time to try something different?. Preventive Medicine 2021; 153: 106851
• 43 Tyldesley-Marshall N, Greenfield SM, Parretti HM. et al. Snacktivity™ to Promote Physical Activity: a Qualitative Study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2021; doi:10.1007/s12529-021-10040-y
• 44 Stamatakis E, Huang BH, Maher C. et al. Untapping the Health Enhancing Potential of Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity (VILPA): Rationale, Scoping Review, and a 4-Pillar Research Framework. Sports Med 2021; 51: 1-10
• 45 Islam H, Gibala MJ, Little JP. Exercise Snacks: A Novel Strategy to Improve Cardiometabolic Health. Exercise and sport sciences reviews 2022; 50: 31-37
• 46 Jenkins EM, Nairn LN, Skelly LE. et al. Do Stair Climbing Exercise “Snacks” Improve Cardiorespiratory Fitness?. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2019; 681–684. doi:10.1139/apnm-2018-0675
• 47 Little JP, Langley J, Lee M. et al. Sprint exercise snacks: a novel approach to increase aerobic fitness. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019; 1203–1212. doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04110-z
• 48 Allison MK, Baglole JH, Martin BJ. et al. Brief Intense Stair Climbing Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017; 49: 298-307
• 49 Sanchez-Lastra MA, Ding D, Dalene KE. et al. Stair climbing and mortality: a prospective cohort study from the UK Biobank. Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 2021; 12: 298-307
• 50 Holtermann A, Krause N, van der Beek AJ. et al. The physical activity paradox: six reasons why occupational physical activity (OPA) does not confer the cardiovascular health benefits that leisure time physical activity does. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 149-150
• 51 Holtermann A. Physical activity health paradox: reflections on physical activity guidelines and how to fill research gap. Occup Environ Med 2022; 79: 145-146
• 52 Cillekens B, Lang M, van Mechelen W. et al. How does occupational physical activity influence health? An umbrella review of 23 health outcomes across 158 observational studies. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 1474-1481
• 53 Martinez Gomez D, Coenen P, Celis-Morales C. et al. Lifetime high occupational physical activity and total and cause-specific mortality among 320 000 adults in the NIH-AARP study: a cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2022; 79: 147-154