Potential Contribution of Ultrasonography Assistance for the Safe and Steady Procedure of Endoscopic Intracerebral Hematoma Evacuation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background Endoscopic hematoma evacuation is one of the most promising procedures for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to avoid severe outcomes, such as death or dependency. However, the effect of the procedure on the functional outcome remains controversial. Thus, standardization and sophistication are required to enhance the surgical results. This study aimed to evaluate the potential efficacy of ultrasonography (US) in endoscopic hematoma evacuation.

methods This study included 39 consecutive patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH who underwent endoscopic hematoma evacuation between April 2019 and July 2021. The patients were divided into two groups, namely, surgery with or without US assistance. Rebleeding and evacuation rate were set as the primary endpoints, and operation time, requirement for repeat puncture, and modified Rankin scale at discharge were set as the secondary endpoints. During surgery, the burr hole was placed, and the dura mater was widely opened. The US probe was applied on the brain surface via the burr hole to detect the depth and direction of the hematoma cavity. With US assistance, the hematoma cavity was punctured with a cannula, and the transparent port was introduced into the hematoma cavity along the tract. The hematoma was gently evacuated with the irrigation–suction instrument.

Results Of the 39 cases, 9 underwent endoscopic hematoma evacuation with US assistance. Rebleeding was noted in 0 and 2 (6.7%) patients with and without US assistance, respectively (p = 0.43). The mean hematoma evacuation rates were 78.6 and 80.6% in patients with and without US assistance, respectively (p = 0.80). In all cases with US assistance, the cavity could be reached with a single tap. However, repeat puncture was required in 20 (66.7%) cases without US assistance (p = 0.04). In one case, an unexpected residual hematoma was detected using US, which was applied after hematoma evacuation and before wound closure. The operation time was not extended even if US was used during the surgery.

Conclusions US-assisted hematoma evacuation is an effective procedure that can assist in the precise insertion of the puncture cannula and exclusion of the residual hematoma. US might contribute toward improving the accuracy of each step of the procedure, thus leading to better clinical outcomes.

Keywords

endoscopic surgery - hematoma evacuation - intracerebral hematoma - ultrasonography

• References

• 1 van Asch CJJ, Luitse MJA, Rinkel GJE, van der Tweel I, Algra A, Klijn CJ. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9 (02) 167-176
• 2 Wilkinson DA, Pandey AS, Thompson BG, Keep RF, Hua Y, Xi G. Injury mechanisms in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Neuropharmacology 2018; 134 (Pt B): 240-248
• 3 Counsell C, Boonyakarnkul S, Dennis M. et al. Primary intracerebral haemorrhage in the Oxfordshire Community stroke project. Cerebrovasc Dis 1995; 5: 26-34
• 4 Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM. et al; STICH investigators. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet 2005; 365 (9457): 387-397
• 5 Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, Murray GD, Gholkar A, Mitchell PM. STICH II Investigators. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial. Lancet 2013; 382 (9890): 397-408
• 6 Vespa P, Hanley D, Betz J. et al; ICES Investigators. ICES Investigators. ICES (Intraoperative Stereotactic Computed Tomography-Guided Endoscopic Surgery) for brain hemorrhage: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2016; 47 (11) 2749-2755
• 7 Scaggiante J, Zhang X, Mocco J, Kellner CP. Minimally invasive surgery for Intracerebral hemorrhage an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke 2018; 49 (11) 2612-2620
• 8 Chang KV, Wu WT, Özçakar L. Ultrasound-guided interventions of the cervical spine and nerves. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2018; 29 (01) 93-103
• 9 Chang KV, Kara M, Su DCJ. et al. Sonoanatomy of the spine: a comprehensive scanning protocol from cervical to sacral region. Med Ultrason 2019; 21 (04) 474-482
• 10 Narenthiran G, Parks C, Pettorini B. Management of Chiari I malformation in children: effectiveness of intra-operative ultrasound for tailoring foramen magnum decompression. Childs Nerv Syst 2015; 31 (08) 1371-1376
• 11 Sadahiro H, Nomura S, Goto H. et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided endoscopic surgery for putaminal hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (05) 1151-1155
• 12 Naritaka H, Ishikawa M, Terao S. et al. Ultrasonographic superb microvascular imaging for emergency surgery of intracerebral hemorrhage. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 75: 206-209
• 13 Li Y, Yang R, Li Z. et al. Surgical evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of safety and efficacy of stereotactic aspiration, endoscopic surgery, and craniotomy. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 332-340
• 14 Eroglu U, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I. et al. Surgical management of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages: endoscopic versus open surgery. World Neurosurg 2018; 114: e60-e65
• 15 Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12 (11) 997-1003
• 16 Hlaváč M, Knoll A, Etzrodt-Walter G. et al. Intraoperative MRI in transsphenoidal resection of invasive pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurg Rev 2019; 42 (03) 737-743
• 17 Gohla G, Bender B, Tatagiba M, Honegger J, Ernemann U, Roder C. Identification of tumor residuals in pituitary adenoma surgery with intraoperative MRI: do we need gadolinium?. Neurosurg Rev 2020; 43 (06) 1623-1629