PDF herunterladen
Semin Neurol 2022; 42(03): 325-334
DOI: 10.1055/a-1892-1894
Review Article

Applications of Advanced MRI to Disorders of Consciousness

David Fischer 
1   Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Virginia Newcombe 
2   Division of Anaesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
,
Davinia Fernandez-Espejo 
3   School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
,
Samuel B. Snider
4   Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
› Institutsangaben Funding D.F. is supported by the NIH National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (R25NS06574309). V.N. is supported by the Academy of Medical Sciences/The Health Foundation Clinician Scientist Fellowship. D.F.-E. has no funding to report. S.B.S. is supported by the American Academy of Neurology Clinical Research Training Scholarship.
› Weitere Informationen
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Disorder of consciousness (DoC) after severe brain injury presents numerous challenges to clinicians, as the diagnosis, prognosis, and management are often uncertain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been used to evaluate brain structure in patients with DoC. More recently, advances in MRI technology have permitted more detailed investigations of the brain's structural integrity (via diffusion MRI) and function (via functional MRI). A growing literature has begun to show that these advanced forms of MRI may improve our understanding of DoC pathophysiology, facilitate the identification of patient consciousness, and improve the accuracy of clinical prognostication. Here we review the emerging evidence for the application of advanced MRI for patients with DoC.

Keywords

neuroimaging - MRI - disorders of consciousness - prognostication


Publikationsverlauf

Accepted Manuscript online:
05. Juli 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. September 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Pratt AK, Chang JJ, Sederstrom NO. A fate worse than death: prognostication of devastating brain injury. Crit Care Med 2019; 47 (04) 591-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Elmer J, Torres C, Aufderheide TP. et al; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2016; 102: 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF. et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ 2011; 183 (14) 1581-1588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hirsch KG, Fischbein N, Mlynash M. et al. Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for post-cardiac arrest coma. Neurology 2020; 94 (16) e1684-e1692
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rohaut B, Doyle KW, Reynolds AS. et al. Deep structural brain lesions associated with consciousness impairment early after hemorrhagic stroke. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 4174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Snider SB, Edlow BL. MRI in disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol 2020; 33 (06) 676-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Laureys S, Schiff ND. Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. Neuroimage 2012; 61 (02) 478-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Koch C, Massimini M, Boly M, Tononi G. Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016; 17 (05) 307-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schiff ND. Cognitive motor dissociation following severe brain injuries. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72 (12) 1413-1415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sair HI, Hannawi Y, Li S. et al; Neuroimaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery (NICER) Consortium. Early functional connectome integrity and 1-year recovery in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Radiology 2018; 287 (01) 247-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Velly L, Perlbarg V, Boulier T. et al; MRI-COMA Investigators. Use of brain diffusion tensor imaging for the prediction of long-term neurological outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: a multicentre, international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17 (04) 317-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fischer DB, Boes AD, Demertzi A. et al. A human brain network derived from coma-causing brainstem lesions. Neurology 2016; 87 (23) 2427-2434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Parvizi J, Damasio AR. Neuroanatomical correlates of brainstem coma. Brain 2003; 126 (Pt 7): 1524-1536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hindman J, Bowren MD, Bruss J, Wright B, Geerling JC, Boes AD. Thalamic strokes that severely impair arousal extend into the brainstem. Ann Neurol 2018; 84 (06) 926-930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Snider SB, Hsu J, Darby RR. et al. Cortical lesions causing loss of consciousness are anticorrelated with the dorsal brainstem. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41 (06) 1520-1531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Adams JH, Jennett B, McLellan DR, Murray LS, Graham DI. The neuropathology of the vegetative state after head injury. J Clin Pathol 1999; 52 (11) 804-806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Posner JB, Saper CB, Schiff ND, Claassen J. Plum and Posner's Diagnosis and Treatment of Stupor and Coma. 5th ed.. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2019
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Owen AM, Coleman MR, Menon DK. et al. Residual auditory function in persistent vegetative state: a combined PET and fMRI study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15 (3-4): 290-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Di HB, Yu SM, Weng XC. et al. Cerebral response to patient's own name in the vegetative and minimally conscious states. Neurology 2007; 68 (12) 895-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Monti MM, Pickard JD, Owen AM. Visual cognition in disorders of consciousness: from V1 to top-down attention. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34 (06) 1245-1253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Menon DK, Owen AM, Williams EJ. et al; Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre Team. Cortical processing in persistent vegetative state. Lancet 1998; 352 (9123): 200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Fox MD, Raichle ME. Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8 (09) 700-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 2011; 106 (03) 1125-1165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Raichle ME. The brain's default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 2015; 38: 433-447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Buckner RL, DiNicola LM. The brain's default network: updated anatomy, physiology and evolving insights. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019; 20 (10) 593-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Fernández-Espejo D, Soddu A, Cruse D. et al. A role for the default mode network in the bases of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2012; 72 (03) 335-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rosazza C, Andronache A, Sattin D. et al; Coma Research Center, Besta Institute. Multimodal study of default-mode network integrity in disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol 2016; 79 (05) 841-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ-F. et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain 2010; 133 (Pt 1): 161-171
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Norton L, Hutchison RM, Young GB, Lee DH, Sharpe MD, Mirsattari SM. Disruptions of functional connectivity in the default mode network of comatose patients. Neurology 2012; 78 (03) 175-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Demertzi A, Antonopoulos G, Heine L. et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity differentiates minimally conscious from unresponsive patients. Brain 2015; 138 (Pt 9): 2619-2631
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF. et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 2007; 27 (09) 2349-2356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wu X, Zou Q, Hu J. et al. Intrinsic functional connectivity patterns predict consciousness level and recovery outcome in acquired brain injury. J Neurosci 2015; 35 (37) 12932-12946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Di Perri C, Bahri MA, Amico E. et al. Neural correlates of consciousness in patients who have emerged from a minimally conscious state: a cross-sectional multimodal imaging study. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15 (08) 830-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Threlkeld ZD, Bodien YG, Rosenthal ES. et al. Functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex 2018; 106: 299-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Kondziella D, Fisher PM, Larsen VA. et al. Functional MRI for assessment of the default mode network in acute brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2017; 27 (03) 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Di Perri C, Amico E, Heine L. et al. Multifaceted brain networks reconfiguration in disorders of consciousness uncovered by co-activation patterns. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39 (01) 89-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Demertzi A, Tagliazucchi E, Dehaene S. et al. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sci Adv 2019; 5 (02) eaat7603
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Cao B, Chen Y, Yu R. et al. Abnormal dynamic properties of functional connectivity in disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 24: 102071
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Pierpaoli C, Basser PJ. Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36 (06) 893-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Weng L, Xie Q, Zhao L. et al. Abnormal structural connectivity between the basal ganglia, thalamus, and frontal cortex in patients with disorders of consciousness. Cortex 2017; 90: 71-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Zheng ZS, Reggente N, Lutkenhoff E, Owen AM, Monti MM. Disentangling disorders of consciousness: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and machine learning. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38 (01) 431-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Snider SB, Bodien YG, Bianciardi M, Brown EN, Wu O, Edlow BL. Disruption of the ascending arousal network in acute traumatic disorders of consciousness. Neurology 2019; 93 (13) e1281-e1287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Newcombe VF, Williams GB, Scoffings D. et al. Aetiological differences in neuroanatomy of the vegetative state: insights from diffusion tensor imaging and functional implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010; 81 (05) 552-561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Guldenmund P, Soddu A, Baquero K. et al. Structural brain injury in patients with disorders of consciousness: a voxel-based morphometry study. Brain Inj 2016; 30 (03) 343-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Annen J, Frasso G, Crone JS. et al; Coma Science Group Collaborators. Regional brain volumetry and brain function in severely brain-injured patients. Ann Neurol 2018; 83 (04) 842-853
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M, Davis MH, Laureys S, Pickard JD. Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 2006; 313 (5792): 1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR. et al. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (07) 579-589
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Edlow BL, Chatelle C, Spencer CA. et al. Early detection of consciousness in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2017; 140 (09) 2399-2414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Fernández-Espejo D, Rossit S, Owen AM. A thalamocortical mechanism for the absence of overt motor behavior in covertly aware patients. JAMA Neurol 2015; 72 (12) 1442-1450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Stafford CA, Owen AM, Fernández-Espejo D. The neural basis of external responsiveness in prolonged disorders of consciousness. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22: 101791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND. et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology 2018; 91 (10) 450-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kondziella D, Bender A, Diserens K. et al; EAN Panel on Coma, Disorders of Consciousness. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27 (05) 741-756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Monti MM, Schnakers C. Flowchart for implementing advanced imaging and electrophysiology in patients with disorders of consciousness: To fMRI or not to fMRI?. Neurology 2022; 98 (11) 452-459
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85 (12) 2020-2029
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Mahadevan AS, Tooley UA, Bertolero MA, Mackey AP, Bassett DS. Evaluating the sensitivity of functional connectivity measures to motion artifact in resting-state fMRI data. bioRxiv 2018; 1-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Burns KEA. et al; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Determination of neurologic prognosis and clinical decision making in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of Canadian intensivists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists. Crit Care Med 2013; 41 (04) 1086-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Leblanc G, Boutin A, Shemilt M. et al. Incidence and impact of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in clinical trials of severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Clin Trials 2018; 15 (04) 398-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Edlow BL, Claassen J, Schiff ND, Greer DM. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: mechanisms, prognosis and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17 (03) 135-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Di H, Boly M, Weng X, Ledoux D, Laureys S. Neuroimaging activation studies in the vegetative state: predictors of recovery?. Clin Med (Lond) 2008; 8 (05) 502-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Coleman MR, Davis MH, Rodd JM. et al. Towards the routine use of brain imaging to aid the clinical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Brain 2009; 132 (Pt 9): 2541-2552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Wang F, Di H, Hu X. et al. Cerebral response to subject's own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state. BMC Med 2015; 13: 83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Koenig MA, Holt JL, Ernst T. et al. MRI default mode network connectivity is associated with functional outcome after cardiopulmonary arrest. Neurocrit Care 2014; 20 (03) 348-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Silva S, de Pasquale F, Vuillaume C. et al. Disruption of posteromedial large-scale neural communication predicts recovery from coma. Neurology 2015; 85 (23) 2036-2044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Song M, Yang Y, He J. et al. Prognostication of chronic disorders of consciousness using brain functional networks and clinical characteristics. eLife 2018; 7: 7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Guo H, Liu R, Sun Z. et al. Evaluation of prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e630-e639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Yu Y, Meng F, Zhang L. et al. A multi-domain prognostic model of disorder of consciousness using resting-state fMRI and laboratory parameters. Brain Imaging Behav 2021; 15 (04) 1966-1976
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Pugin D, Hofmeister J, Gasche Y. et al. Resting-state brain activity for early prediction outcome in postanoxic patients in a coma with indeterminate clinical prognosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020; 41 (06) 1022-1030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Peran P, Malagurski B, Nemmi F. et al. Functional and structural integrity of frontoparietal connectivity in traumatic and anoxic coma. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (08) e639-e647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Fischer D, Threlkeld ZD, Bodien YG. et al. Intact brain network function in an unresponsive patient with COVID-19. Ann Neurol 2020; 88 (04) 851-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Qin P, Wu X, Huang Z. et al. How are different neural networks related to consciousness?. Ann Neurol 2015; 78 (04) 594-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Maknojia S, Churchill NW, Schweizer TA, Graham SJ. Resting state fMRI: going through the motions. Front Neurosci 2019; 13: 825
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Kirsch M, Guldenmund P, Ali Bahri M. et al. Sedation of patients with disorders of consciousness during neuroimaging: effects on resting state functional brain connectivity. Anesth Analg 2017; 124 (02) 588-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Stamatakis EA, Adapa RM, Absalom AR, Menon DK. Changes in resting neural connectivity during propofol sedation. PLoS One 2010; 5 (12) e14224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Liang P, Zhang H, Xu Y, Jia W, Zang Y, Li K. Disruption of cortical integration during midazolam-induced light sedation. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36 (11) 4247-4261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Bonhomme V, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A. et al. Resting-state network-specific breakdown of functional connectivity during ketamine alteration of consciousness in volunteers. Anesthesiology 2016; 125 (05) 873-888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Guldenmund P, Demertzi A, Boveroux P. et al. Thalamus, brainstem and salience network connectivity changes during propofol-induced sedation and unconsciousness. Brain Connect 2013; 3 (03) 273-285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Ni L, Wen J, Zhang LJ. et al. Aberrant default-mode functional connectivity in patients with end-stage renal disease: a resting-state functional MR imaging study. Radiology 2014; 271 (02) 543-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Murray GD, Butcher I, McHugh GS. et al. Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24 (02) 329-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Galanaud D, Perlbarg V, Gupta R. et al; Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery Consortium. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology 2012; 117 (06) 1300-1310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Tollard E, Galanaud D, Perlbarg V. et al. Experience of diffusion tensor imaging and 1H spectroscopy for outcome prediction in severe traumatic brain injury: Preliminary results. Crit Care Med 2009; 37 (04) 1448-1455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Betz J, Zhuo J, Roy A, Shanmuganathan K, Gullapalli RP. Prognostic value of diffusion tensor imaging parameters in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29 (07) 1292-1305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Luyt CE, Galanaud D, Perlbarg V. et al; Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery Consortium. Diffusion tensor imaging to predict long-term outcome after cardiac arrest: a bicentric pilot study. Anesthesiology 2012; 117 (06) 1311-1321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Greicius MD, Kiviniemi V, Tervonen O. et al. Persistent default-mode network connectivity during light sedation. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29 (07) 839-847
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Bevers MB, Scirica BM, Avery KR, Henderson GV, Lin AP, Lee JW. Combination of clinical exam, MRI and EEG to predict outcome following cardiac arrest and targeted temperature management. Neurocrit Care 2018; 29 (03) 396-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Bruno MA, Fernández-Espejo D, Lehembre R. et al. Multimodal neuroimaging in patients with disorders of consciousness showing “functional hemispherectomy”. Prog Brain Res 2011; 193: 323-333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Barth M, Breuer F, Koopmans PJ, Norris DG, Poser BA. Simultaneous multislice (SMS) imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med 2016; 75 (01) 63-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Setsompop K, Gagoski BA, Polimeni JR, Witzel T, Wedeen VJ, Wald LL. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67 (05) 1210-1224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Chan ST, Evans KC, Song TY. et al. Dynamic brain-body coupling of breath-by-breath O2-CO2 exchange ratio with resting state cerebral hemodynamic fluctuations. PLoS One 2020; 15 (09) e0238946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Chang C, Glover GH. Relationship between respiration, end-tidal CO2, and BOLD signals in resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 2009; 47 (04) 1381-1393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Kalthoff D, Seehafer JU, Po C, Wiedermann D, Hoehn M. Functional connectivity in the rat at 11.7T: impact of physiological noise in resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 2011; 54 (04) 2828-2839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Birn RM, Diamond JB, Smith MA, Bandettini PA. Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI. Neuroimage 2006; 31 (04) 1536-1548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Glover GH, Li TQ, Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44 (01) 162-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Edlow BL, Barra ME, Zhou DW. et al. Personalized connectome mapping to guide targeted therapy and promote recovery of consciousness in the intensive care unit. Neurocrit Care 2020; 33 (02) 364-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Crone JS, Schurz M, Höller Y. et al. Impaired consciousness is linked to changes in effective connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex within the default mode network. Neuroimage 2015; 110: 101-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 Achard S, Delon-Martin C, Vértes PE. et al. Hubs of brain functional networks are radically reorganized in comatose patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109 (50) 20608-20613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (06) 600-614
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Thibaut A, Chennu S, Chatelle C. et al. Theta network centrality correlates with tDCS response in disorders of consciousness. Brain Stimul 2018; 11 (06) 1407-1409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Horn A, Fox MD. Opportunities of connectomic neuromodulation. Neuroimage 2020; 221: 117180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Spindler LRB, Luppi AI, Adapa RM. et al. Dopaminergic brainstem disconnection is common to pharmacological and pathological consciousness perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118 (30) 118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar