Misconceptions, Myths, and Mystery: A Cross-sectional Survey Study on Public Knowledge and Values of Microsurgery

Abstract

Background Microsurgery is a foundational plastic surgery principle. However, public unawareness of microsurgery and its associated rigorous training in the United States may contribute to current misconceptions and undervaluing of plastic and reconstructive surgeons. This study aims to characterize public knowledge of microsurgery.

Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to September 2021 using Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess baseline public knowledge of microsurgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the association between baseline knowledge and demographic characteristics. Significance was set to a p < 0.05.

Results A total of 516 responses were analyzed. The mean age was 36.7 years (standard deviation, 16.04 years; white, 84%; non-Hispanic, 70%). Of those surveyed, 52% agreed that general surgeons perform microsurgery, while only 28% agreed that plastic and reconstructive surgeons perform microsurgery. When asked if head and neck reconstruction, breast reconstruction, and finger replantation required microsurgery, only 28, 41, and 41% of respondents agreed, respectively. When controlled for sociodemographic factors, Hispanics had significantly more odds to mistake that head and neck reconstruction did not require microsurgery (odds ratio [OR] 95% CI 0.49; 0.30–0.80; p = 0.004) and less odds to consider plastic and reconstructive surgeons for reconstruction (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32–0.84; p = 0.008). Females had 1.63 more odds of considering plastic and reconstructive surgeons for reconstruction (95% CI 1.09–2.43; p = 0.017). Low-educated participants had significantly more odds to consider general surgeons as those who performed reconstructive microsurgery (OR 8.70; 95% CI 1.09–69.40; p = 0.041).

Conclusion Misconceptions of microsurgery as a foundational principle of plastic surgery persist and correlate with undervaluing the specialty. Knowledge differs by ethnicity, level of education, and gender. Therefore, patient counseling should use culturally appropriate elements to demystify microsurgery, build value, and better inform risks and benefits.

Keywords

microsurgery - education - reconstruction

Ethical Statement

The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Publication History

Received: 02 April 2022

Accepted: 05 July 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
11 July 2022

Article published online:
26 September 2022

• References

• 1 de Blacam C, Kilmartin D, Mc Dermott C, Kelly J. Public perception of plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (02) 197-204
• 2 Dunkin CSJ, Pleat JM, Jones SAM, Goodacre TEE. Perception and reality-a study of public and professional perceptions of plastic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56 (05) 437-443
• 3 Xun H, Lee E, Yesantharao P. et al. Reconstructive and restorative cues improve public perception on the value of plastic and reconstructive surgeries. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (11) 2947-2956
• 4 Widgerow AD. Plastic surgery–more than just a nip and tuck. S Afr Med J 1994; 84 (01) 7
• 5 Gill P, Bruscino-Raiola F, Leung M. Public perception of the field of plastic surgery. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81 (10) 669-672
• 6 Kim DC, Kim S, Mitra A. Perceptions and misconceptions of the plastic and reconstructive surgeon. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38 (04) 426-430
• 7 Park AJ, Scerri GV, Benamore R, McDiarmid JG, Lamberty BG. What do plastic surgeons do?. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1998; 43 (03) 189-193
• 8 Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13 (12) 791-798
• 9 Chew LD, Bradley KA, Flum DR, Cornia PB, Koepsell TD. The impact of low health literacy on surgical practice. Am J Surg 2004; 188 (03) 250-253
• 10 Vargas CR, Chuang DJ, Lee BT. Assessment of patient health literacy: a national survey of plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1405-1414
• 11 DeSanti RL, Nair L, Adetayo OA. Increasing diversity in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (05) 813e-814e
• 12 Noel OF, Berg A, Onyango N, Mackay DR. Ethnic and gender diversity comparison between surgical patients and caring surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (10) e3198
• 13 Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, Black CK, Song DH. The public's preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (02) 619-630
• 14 Mortensen K, Hughes TL. Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33 (04) 533-538
• 15 Bardos J, Friedenthal J, Spiegelman J, Williams Z. Cloud based surveys to assess patient perceptions of health care: 1000 respondents in 3 days for US $300. JMIR Res Protoc 2016; 5 (03) e166
• 16 Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG. Running experiments on Amazon mechanical turk. Judgm Decis Mak 2010; 5 (05) 411-419
• 17 Chandler J, Shapiro D. Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2016; 12 (01) 53-81
• 18 Arditte KA, Çek D, Shaw AM, Timpano KR. The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research. Psychol Assess 2016; 28 (06) 684-691