RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000020.xml
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82(11): 1194-1248
DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-6769
DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-6769
GebFra Science
Guideline/Leitlinie
Vaginale Geburt am Termin – Teil 2. Leitlinie der DGGG, OEGGG und SGGG (S3-Level, AWMF-Registernummer 015/083, Dezember 2020)
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch
Zusammenfassung
Ziel Das Ziel der vorliegenden Leitlinie ist die Zusammenfassung des aktuellen Wissens über die vaginale Geburt am Termin mit dem Fokus auf Definition der physiologischen Geburtsphasen mit Abgrenzung pathologischer Entwicklungen und Zustände sowie einer Einschätzung der Notwendigkeit oder auch Vermeidung einer Intervention. In diesem zweiten Teil werden Empfehlungen und Statements zur Betreuung in der Eröffnungs- und Austrittsphase sowie der Betreuung in der Nachgeburtsperiode präsentiert.
Methoden Die deutschen Empfehlungen geben inhaltlich überwiegend die Empfehlungen der National-Institute-for-Health-and-Care-Excellence-(NICE-)Leitlinie CG 190 „Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies“ wieder. In Einzelfällen wurden für die Erstellung der vorliegenden Leitlinien auch andere internationale Leitlinien verwendet. Darüber hinaus erfolgte, sofern für notwendig erachtet, eine systematische Literaturrecherche und -bewertung anhand von PICO-Fragen und die Berücksichtigung weiterer systematischer Reviews oder Einzelstudien. Zur Bewertung der Qualität zusätzlich berücksichtigter Studien wurden die Bewertungsinstrumente des Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) zur leichteren Verständlichkeit angewendet. Ansonsten wurden in der NICE-Leitlinie sowie den Evidenzberichten des IQWiG das GRADE-System zur Bewertung der Qualität der Evidenz verwendet.
Empfehlungen Die Formulierung von Empfehlungen und Statements erfolgte auf Basis identifizierter Evidenzen und/oder durch eine strukturierte Konsensfindung.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 17. Juli 2022
Angenommen nach Revision: 18. Juli 2022
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
03. November 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Kaiko RF, Foley KM, Grabinski PY. et al. Central nervous system excitatory effects of meperidine in cancer patients. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 180-185 DOI: 10.1002/ana.410130213.
- 2 Portz S, Schmidt M, Weitz M. Lying down after premature rupture of the membranes in term singleton pregnancies: an evidence-based recommendation?. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2016; 220: 200-206 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107361.
- 3 National Institute for Health and Care-Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care. Care of healthy woman and their babies during childbirth. Clinical guideline [CG 190]. NICE CG190 National Collaborating Centre for Womenʼs and Childrenʼs Health; 2014. Zugriff am 15. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190
- 4 Hannah ME, Hodnett ED, Willan A. et al. Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: expectant management at home or in hospital? The TermPROM Study Group. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 96: 533-538 DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00971-6.
- 5 Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL. et al. International Multicentre Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Study: evaluation of predictors of clinical chorioamnionitis and postpartum fever in patients with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1024-1029 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70007-3.
- 6 Ezra Y, Michaelson-Cohen R, Abramov Y. et al. Prelabor rupture of the membranes at term: when to induce labor?. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 115: 23-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.07.007.
- 7 Jomeen J, Martin CR. The impact of clinical management type on maternal and neonatal outcome following pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 2002; 6: 3-9 DOI: 10.1054/cein.2002.0249.
- 8 Hagskog K, Nisell H, Sarman I. et al. Conservative ambulatory management of prelabor rupture of the membranes at term in nulliparous women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 765-769 DOI: 10.3109/00016349409072501.
- 9 Eriksson M, Ladfors L, Mattsson LA. et al. Warm tub bath during labor. A study of 1385 women with prelabor rupture of the membranes after 34 weeks of gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 75: 642-644 DOI: 10.3109/00016349609054689.
- 10 Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL. et al. International multicenter term PROM study: evaluation of predictors of neonatal infection in infants born to patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Premature Rupture of the Membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 635-639 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70056-0.
- 11 Flenady V, King J. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; (03) CD001807 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001807.
- 12 Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (01) CD005302 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub2.
- 13 Saccone G, Berghella V. Antibiotic prophylaxis for term or near-term premature rupture of membranes: metaanalysis of randomized trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 627.e1-627.e9 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.034.
- 14 Wojcieszek AM, Stock OM, Flenady V. Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10) CD001807 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001807.pub2.
- 15 Middleton P, Shepherd E, Flenady V. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (01) CD005302 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005302.pub3.
- 16 Kehl S, Hösli I, Pecks U. et al. Induction of Labour. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k, AWMF Registry No. 015-088, December 2020). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81: 870-895 DOI: 10.1055/a-1519-7713.
- 17 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (IQWiG). Definitionen der Geburtsphasen. IQWiG-Berichte – Nr. 517. 2017. Zugriff am 16. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.iqwig.de/download/v16-01a_definitionen-der-geburtsphasen_rapid-report_v1-0.pdf
- 18 Lauzon L, Hodnett E. Antenatal education for self-diagnosis of the onset of active labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; 1998 (02) CD000935 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000935.
- 19 Maimburg RD, Vaeth M, Durr J. et al. Randomised trial of structured antenatal training sessions to improve the birth process. BJOG 2010; 117: 921-928 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02584.x.
- 20 Paz-Pascual C, Pinedo IA, Grandes G. et al. Design and process of the EMA Cohort Study: the value of antenatal education in childbirth and breastfeeding. BMC Nurs 2008; 7: 5 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-7-5.
- 21 Green JM, Spiby H, Hucknall C. et al. Converting policy into care: womenʼs satisfaction with the early labour telephone component of the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Labour. J Adv Nurs 2012; 68: 2218-2228 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05906.x.
- 22 Janssen PA, Still DK, Klein MC. et al. Early labor assessment and support at home versus telephone triage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1463-1469 DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247644.64154.bb.
- 23 Weavers A, Nash K. Setting up a triage telephone line for women in early labour. British Journal of Midwifery 2012; 20: 333-338 DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2012.20.5.333.
- 24 Janssen PA, Iker CE, Carty EA. Early labour assessment and support at home: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 734-741 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31002-7.
- 25 Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Willan AR. et al. Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 337: a1021 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1021.
- 26 Smith CA, Collins CT, Crowther CA. Aromatherapy for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (07) CD009215 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009215.
- 27 Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM. et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006 (04) CD003521 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003521.pub2.
- 28 Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT. et al. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (12) CD009514 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009514.
- 29 Smith CA, Levett KM, Collins CT. et al. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (02) CD009290 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009290.pub2.
- 30 Parsons M, Bidewell J, Nagy S. Natural eating behavior in latent labor and its effect on outcomes in active labor. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006; 51: e1-e6 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.08.015.
- 31 Cluett ER, Nikodem VC, McCandlish RE. et al. Immersion in water in pregnancy, labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (02) CD000111 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub2.
- 32 Abukhalil I, Kilby M, Aiken J. et al. Can the frequency of vaginal examinations influence the duration of labour?. IJGO 1994; 46: 151
- 33 Ahlden S, Andersch B, Stigsson L. et al. Prediction of sepsis neonatorum following a full-term pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1988; 25: 181-185 DOI: 10.1159/000293768.
- 34 World Health Organization. Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme. World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. Lancet 1994; 343: 1399-1404
- 35 Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Partogram action line study: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 976-980 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10260.x.
- 36 Pattinson RC, Howarth GR, Mdluli W. et al. Aggressive or expectant management of labour: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2003; 110: 457-461
- 37 Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Effect of different partogram action lines on birth outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 295-302 DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226862.78768.5c.
- 38 Ranta P, Spalding M, Kangas-Saarela T. et al. Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain–options of 1091 Finnish parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 60-66 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1995.tb05593.x.
- 39 Price DD, Harkins SW, Baker C. Sensory-affective relationships among different types of clinical and experimental pain. Pain 1987; 28: 297-307 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90065-0.
- 40 Bonnel AM, Boureau F. Labor pain assessment: validity of a behavioral index. Pain 1985; 22: 81-90 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90150-2.
- 41 Brown ST, Campbell D, Kurtz A. Characteristics of labor pain at two stages of cervical dilation. Pain 1989; 38: 289-295 DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90215-7.
- 42 Gross MM, Hecker H, Keirse MJ. An evaluation of pain and “fitness” during labor and its acceptability to women. Birth 2005; 32: 122-128 DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00355.x.
- 43 Beilin Y, Hossain S, Bodian CA. The numeric rating scale and labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1794-1798 DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000061581.23351.29.
- 44 Sittner B, Hudson DB, Grossman CC. et al. Adolescentsʼ perceptions of pain during labor. Clin Nurs Res 1998; 7: 82-93 DOI: 10.1177/105477389800700107.
- 45 Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M. et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 1976; 31: 1191-1198 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1976.tb11971.x.
- 46 Wuitchik M, Bakal D, Lipshitz J. The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 35-42
- 47 Baker A, Ferguson SA, Roach GD. et al. Perceptions of labour pain by mothers and their attending midwives. J Adv Nurs 2001; 35: 171-179 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01834.x.
- 48 Lowe NK, Roberts JE. The convergence between in-labor report and postpartum recall of parturition pain. Res Nurs Health 1988; 11: 11-21 DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770110104.
- 49 Niven C, Gijsbers K. A study of labour pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 1347-1351 DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90023-6.
- 50 Sheiner EK, Sheiner E, Shoham-Vardi I. et al. Ethnic differences influence care giverʼs estimates of pain during labour. Pain 1999; 81: 299-305 DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00019-6.
- 51 Frigoletto jr. FD, Lieberman E, Lang JM. et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 745-750 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199509213331201.
- 52 Rogers R, Gilson GJ, Miller AC. et al. Active management of labor: does it make a difference?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 599-605 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70152-2.
- 53 Menticoglou SM, Manning F, Harman C. et al. Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 906-912 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90364-x.
- 54 Russell R, Reynolds F. Epidural infusion of low-dose bupivacaine and opioid in labour. Does reducing motor block increase the spontaneous delivery rate?. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 266-273 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb13645.x.
- 55 Simkin PP, OʼHara M. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S131-S159 DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.122382.
- 56 Bloom SL, McIntire DD, Kelly MA. et al. Lack of effect of walking on labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 76-79 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199807093390203.
- 57 MacLennan AH, Cowther C, Derham R. Does the option to ambulate during spontaneous labour confer any advantage or disadvantage?. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine 1993; 3: 43-48
- 58 Flynn AM, Kelly J, Hollins G. et al. Ambulation in labour. Br Med J 1978; 2: 591-593 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6137.591.
- 59 Molina FJ, Sola PA, Lopez E. et al. Pain in the first stage of labor: relationship with the patientʼs position. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13: 98-103 DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00270-9.
- 60 Andrews CM, Chrzanowski M. Maternal position, labor, and comfort. Appl Nurs Res 1990; 3: 7-13 DOI: 10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80148-x.
- 61 Cammu H, Van Eeckhout E. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed use of amniotomy and oxytocin infusion in nulliparous labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 313-318 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09734.x.
- 62 Lopez-Zeno JA, Peaceman AM, Adashek JA. et al. A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 450-454 DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199202133260705.
- 63 Cohen GR, OʼBrien WF, Lewis L. et al. A prospective randomized study of the aggressive management of early labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 1174-1177 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80288-0.
- 64 Fraser WD, Turcot L, Krauss I. et al. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (02) CD000015 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000015.
- 65 Cardozo L, Pearce JM. Oxytocin in active-phase abnormalities of labor: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 152-157
- 66 Bidgood KA, Steer PJ. A randomized control study of oxytocin augmentation of labour. 1. Obstetric outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 94: 512-517 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03142.x.
- 67 Blanch G, Lavender T, Walkinshaw S. et al. Dysfunctional labour: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 117-120 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09362.x.
- 68 Merrill DC, Zlatnik FJ. Randomized, double-masked comparison of oxytocin dosage in induction and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 455-463 DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00338-5.
- 69 Jamal A, Kalantari R. High and low dose oxytocin in augmentation of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 6-8 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.06.004.
- 70 Majoko F. Effectiveness and safety of high dose oxytocin for augmentation of labour in nulliparous women. Cent Afr J Med 2001; 47: 247-250 DOI: 10.4314/cajm.v47i11.8624.
- 71 Satin AJ, Leveno KJ, Sherman ML. et al. High-dose oxytocin: 20- versus 40-minute dosage interval. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 234-238
- 72 Lazor LZ, Philipson EH, Ingardia CJ. et al. A randomized comparison of 15- and 40-minute dosing protocols for labor augmentation and induction. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 1009-1012
- 73 Arulkumaran S, Yang M, Ingemarsson I. et al. Augmentation of labour: does oxytocin titration to achieve preset active contraction area values produce better obstetric outcome?. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 15: 333-337 DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1989.tb00197.x.
- 74 Cummiskey KC, Gall SA, Dawood MY. Pulsatile administration of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74: 869-872
- 75 Xenakis EM, Langer O, Piper JM. et al. Low-dose versus high-dose oxytocin augmentation of labor–a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1874-1878 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90444-1.
- 76 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Care in established first stage of labour. 2020. Zugriff am 15. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190
- 77 American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 693-711 DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d.
- 78 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW. et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1281-1287 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e.
- 79 Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM. et al. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (05) CD000331 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4.
- 80 Smyth RM, Alldred SK, Markham C. et al. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (01) CD006167 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub3.
- 81 Ghi T, Eggebo T, Lees C. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 128-139 DOI: 10.1002/uog.19072.
- 82 Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ. et al. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (05) CD002006 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub4.
- 83 Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A. et al. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (03) CD009124 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3.
- 84 Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM. et al. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (06) CD006672 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3.
- 85 Magoga G, Saccone G, Al-Kouatly HB. et al. Warm perineal compresses during the second stage of labor for reducing perineal trauma: A meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 240: 93-98 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.06.011.
- 86 Pierce-Williams RAM, Saccone G, Berghella V. Hands-on versus hands-off techniques for the prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34: 993-1001 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1619686.
- 87 Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G. et al. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (02) CD000081 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.
- 88 Pergialiotis V, Bellos I, Fanaki M. et al. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 247: 94-100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.02.025.
- 89 Eogan M, Daly L, OʼConnell PR. et al. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?. BJOG 2006; 113: 190-194 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00835.x.
- 90 Kalis V, Karbanova J, Horak M. et al. The incision angle of mediolateral episiotomy before delivery and after repair. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008; 103: 5-8 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.05.026.
- 91 Stedenfeldt M, Pirhonen J, Blix E. et al. Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study. BJOG 2012; 119: 724-730 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03293.x.
- 92 Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP. et al. High-dose vs. low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 296-304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007.
- 93 Kenyon S, Tokumasu H, Dowswell T. et al. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation of delayed labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (07) CD007201 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007201.pub3.
- 94 Webb SS, Yates D, Manresa M. et al. Impact of subsequent birth and delivery mode for women with previous OASIS: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2017; 28: 507-514 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3226-y.
- 95 Fynes M, Donnelly V, Behan M. et al. Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study. Lancet 1999; 354: 983-986 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11205-9.
- 96 Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after a complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 724-726 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13870.x.
- 97 Tetzschner T, Sorensen M, Lose G. et al. Anal and urinary incontinence in women with obstetric anal sphincter rupture. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 1034-1040 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09557.x.
- 98 Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (05) CD000111 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4.
- 99 Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC. et al. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (11) CD003519 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub4.
- 100 Begley CM, Gyte GM, Devane D. et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; (02) CD007412 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub5.
- 101 Adnan N, Conlan-Trant R, McCormick C. et al. Intramuscular versus intravenous oxytocin to prevent postpartum haemorrhage at vaginal delivery: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2018; 362: k3546 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3546.
- 102 Gallos ID, Papadopoulou A, Man R. et al. Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (12) CD011689 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3.
- 103 Aigmueller T, Bader W, Beilecke K. et al. Management of 3rd and 4th Degree Perineal Tears after Vaginal Birth. German Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (AWMF Registry No. 015/079, October 2014). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2015; 75: 137-144 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1396323.
- 104 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern (Kinder-Richtlinie) in der Fassung vom 18. Juni 2015, veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 18.08.2016 B1, zuletzt geändert am 14. Mai 2020, veröffentlicht im Bundesanzeiger AT 29.05.2020 B6, in Kraft getreten am 25. März 2020.
- 105 Balogun OO, OʼSullivan EJ, McFadden A. et al. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (11) CD001688 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001688.pub3.
- 106 Selbmann H, Eißner H, Warnke W. Qualitätssicherung in der Geburtshilfe. Materialien und Berichte. Gerlingen: Bleicher Verlag; 1989
- 107 Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTIQ). Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr. 2017. Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Berlin: 2018. Zugriff am 21. Oktober 2022 unter: https://iqtig.org/downloads/auswertung/2017/16n1gebh/QSKH_16n1-GEBH_2017_BUAW_V02_2018-08-01.pdf
- 108 Dangel-Vogelsang B, Holthaus E, Kolleck B, Korporal J. Außerklinische Geburtshilfe in Hessen: Wie modern ist die Hebammen-Geburtshilfe?. Hamburg: E B Verlag; 1997
- 109 GKV Spitzenverband. Hebammenhilfevertrag. Anlage 3 Qualitätsvereinbarung zum Vertrag nach § 134a SGB V. Redaktionell angepasst am 01.04.2020 ed. 2015. Zugriff am 16. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.gkv-spitzenverband.de/media/dokumente/krankenversicherung_1/ambulante_leistungen/hebammen/aktuelle_dokumente/15_Anhang_3.a_QM_zur_Anlage_3_QV_09-2017.pdf
- 110 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2009 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2010
- 111 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2011 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2012
- 112 AQUA-Institut. Bundesauswertung zum Erfassungsjahr 2013 16/1 – Geburtshilfe. Qualitätsindikatoren. Göttingen: AQUA-Institut; 2014
- 113 Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses Richtlinie zu planungsrelevanten Qualitätsindikatoren – plan. QI-RL. 2019. Zugriff am 16. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.g-ba.de/downloads/39-261-3812/2019-06-20_PlanQI-RL_Veroeffentlichung-QI-akt-Bericht-2017.pdf
- 114 Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO). QSR – Verfahren. Entwicklung der Leistungsbereiche Vaginale Entbindung und Sectio Abschlussbericht. Berlin: Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK; 2016
- 115 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Perinatale Medizin. S1-Leitlinie 087-001: Empfehlungen für die strukturellen Voraussetzungen der perinatologischen Versorgung in Deutschland. 2015. Zugriff am 15. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/087-001.html
- 116 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Safe midwifery staffing for maternity settings. NICE guideline [NG4]. 2015. Zugriff am 16. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng4/resources/safe-midwifery-staffing-for-maternity-settings-pdf-51040125637
- 117 Bazian Ltd.. Safe midwife staffing for maternity settings: The relationship between midwife staffing at a local level and maternal and neonatal outcomes, and factors affecting these requirements. London: Bazian Ltd. A report for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014. Zugriff am 16. Oktober 2022 unter: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng4/resources/safe-midwifery-staffing-for-maternity-settings-pdf-51040125637
- 118 Tucker J, Parry G, Penney G. et al. Is midwife workload associated with quality of process of care (continuous electronic fetal monitoring [CEFM]) and neonatal outcome indicators? A prospective study in consultant-led labour wards in Scotland. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003; 17: 369-377 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00524.x.
- 119 Cerbinskaite A, Malone S, McDermott J. et al. Emergency caesarean section: influences on the decision-to-delivery interval. J Pregnancy 2011; 2011: 640379 DOI: 10.1155/2011/640379.