PDF herunterladen
Int J Sports Med 2023; 44(06): 420-426
DOI: 10.1055/a-1928-9824
Physiology & Biochemistry

Femur 3D-DXA Assessment in Female Football Players, Swimmers, and Sedentary Controls

Amineh Amani‡
1   Cellular Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Barcelona, Spain
2   Centre Mèdic, CETIR, Barcelona, Spain
,
Montse Bellver‡
3   Sports Medicine, Centre Alt Rendiment Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
,
Luis del Rio
2   Centre Mèdic, CETIR, Barcelona, Spain
,
Joan Ramon Torrella
1   Cellular Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Biologia, Barcelona, Spain
,
Antonia Lizarraga
4   Medical Services, Futbol Club Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
,
Ludovic Humbert
5   Musculoskeletal Unit, Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain
,
Franchek Drobnic
3   Sports Medicine, Centre Alt Rendiment Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
6   Medical Department, Shanghai Shenhau FC, Shanghai, China
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Cortical and trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), cortical thickness and surface BMD (sBMD, density-to-thickness ratio) were analyzed in the proximal femur of elite female football players and artistic swimmers using three-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (3D-DXA) software and compared to sedentary controls. Football players had significantly higher (p<0.05) vBMD (mg/cm3) in the trabecular (263±44) and cortical femur (886±69) than artistic swimmers (224±43 and 844±89) and sedentary controls (215±51 and 841±85). Football players had also higher (p<0.05) cortical thickness (2.12±0.19 mm) and sBMD (188±22 mg/cm2) compared to artistic swimmers (1.85±0.15 and 156±21) and sedentary controls (1.87±0.16 and 158±23). Artistic swimmers did not show significant differences in any parameter analyzed for 3D-DXA when compared to sedentary controls. The 3D-DXA modeling revealed statistical differences in cortical thickness and vBMD between female athletes engaged in weight-bearing (football) and non-weight bearing (swimming) sports and did not show differences between the non-weight bearing sport and the sedentary controls. 3D-DXA modeling could provide insight into bone remodeling in the sports field, allowing evaluation of femoral trabecular and cortical strength from standard DXA scans.

Key words

3D analysis - bone health - exercise


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 21. April 2022

Angenommen: 11. August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
22. August 2022

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
20. März 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Compston JE, Papapoulos SE, Blanchard F.. Report on osteoporosis in the European Community: current status and recommendations for the future. Working Party from European Union Member States. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 531-534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US), 2004: PMID 20945569
    PubMed
  • 3 El Maghraoui A, Roux C.. DXA scanning in clinical practice. QJM 2008; 101: 605-617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gifre L, Humbert L, Muxi A, Del Rio L. et al. Analysis of the evolution of cortical and trabecular bone compartments in the proximal femur after spinal cord injury by 3D-DXA. Osteoporo Int 2018; 29: 201-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Humbert L, Martelli Y, Fonolla R. et al. 3D-DXA: Assessing the femoral shape, the trabecular macrostructure and the cortex in 3D from DXA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2017; 36: 27-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Väänänen SP, Grassi L, Flivik G. et al. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image. Med Image Anal 2015; 24: 125-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bala Y, Zebaze R, Seeman E.. Role of cortical bone in bone fragility. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2015; 27: 406-413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG. et al. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet 2005; 366: 129-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tveit M, Rosengren BE, Nilsson JÅ. et al. Exercise in youth: High bone mass, large bone size, and low fracture risk in old age: Elite soccer, bone traits, and fractures. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2015; 25: 453-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Farr JN, Amin S, LeBrasseur NK. et al. Body composition during childhood and adolescence: relations to bone strength and microstructure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99: 4641-4648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Agostinete RR, Fernandes RA, Narciso PH. et al. Categorizing 10 sports according to bone and soft tissue profiles in adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020; 52: 2673-2681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Stojanović E, Radovanović D, Dalbo VJ. et al. Basketball players possess a higher bone mineral density than matched non-athletes, swimming, soccer, and volleyball athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15: 123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ubago-Guisado E, Vlachopoulos D, Fatouros IG. et al. Longitudinal determinants of 12-month changes on bone health in adolescent male athletes. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13: 106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nilsson M, Ohlsson C, Mellström D. et al. Sport-specific association between exercise loading and the density, geometry, and microstructure of weight-bearing bone in young adult men. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 1613-1622
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bellver M, Del Rio L, Jovell E. et al. Bone mineral density and bone mineral content among female elite athletes. Bone 2019; 127: 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gomez-Bruton A, Montero-Marín J, González-Agüero A. et al. The effect of swimming during childhood and adolescence on bone mineral sensity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2016; 46: 365-379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stanforth D, Lu T, Stults-Kolehmainen MA. et al. Bone mineral content and density among female NCAA Division I athletes across the competitive season and over a multi-year time frame. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 2828-2838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gómez-Bruton A, Montero-Marin J, González-Agüero A. et al. Swimming and peak bone mineral density: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 365-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nikander R, Sievänen H, Heinonen A. et al. Femoral neck structure in adult female athletes subjected to different loading modalities. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 520-528
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kazakia GJ, Tjong W, Nirody JA. et al. The influence of disuse on bone microstructure and mechanics assessed by HR-pQCT. Bone 2014; 63: 132-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Vico L, van Rietbergen B, Vilayphiou N. et al. Cortical and trabecular bone microstructure did not recover at weight-bearing skeletal sites and progressively deteriorated at non-weight-bearing sites during the year following international space station missions. J Bone Miner Res 2017; 32: 2010-2021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McKay AAK, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES. et al. Defining training and performance caliber: a Participant Classification Framework. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2022; 17: 317-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Morgan SL. et al. International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance. J Clin Densitom 2016; 19: 127-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 World Health Organization. Assessment of Fracture Risk and its Application to Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Report of a WHO Study Group. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1994: 129
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Humbert L, Hazrati Marangalou J, del Río Barquero LM. et al. Cortical thickness and density estimation from clinical CT using a prior thickness-density relationship: Estimating cortical thickness and density from clinical CT. Med Phys 2016; 43: 1945-1954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Orduna G, Humbert L, Fonolla R. et al. Cortical and trabecular bone analysis of patients with high bone mass from the Barcelona osteoporosis cohort using 3-dimensional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: A case-control study. J Clin Densitom 2018; 21: 480-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Koşar ŞN.. Associations of lean and fat mass measures with whole body bone mineral content and bone mineral density in female adolescent weightlifters and swimmers. Turk J Pediatr 2016; 58: 79-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen J, Burke L. et al. The IOC consensus statement: beyond the Female Athlete Triad – Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S). Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 491-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bellver M, Drobnic F, Jovell E. et al. Jumping rope and whole-body vibration program effects on bone values in Olympic artistic swimmers. J Bone Miner Metab 2021; 39: 858-867
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Freitas L, Amorim T, Humbert L. et al. Cortical and trabecular bone analysis of professional dancers using 3D-DXA: a case-control study. J Sports Sci 2019; 37: 82-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lozano-Berges G, Matute-Llorente A, González-Agüero A. et al. Soccer helps build strong bones during growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pediatr 2018; 177: 295-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Plaza-Carmona M, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Gómez-Cabello A. et al. Higher bone mass in prepubertal and peripubertal female footballers. Eur J Sport Sci 2016; 16: 877-883
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Machado MM, Fernandes PR, Cardadeiro G. et al. Femoral neck bone adaptation to weight-bearing physical activity by computational analysis. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2179-2185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Humbert L, Winzenrieth R, Di Gregorio S. et al. 3D Analysis of cortical and trabecular bone from hip DXA: precision and trend assessment interval in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 2019; 22: 214-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ruiz Wills C, Olivares AL, Tassani S. et al. 3D patient-specific finite element models of the proximal femur based on DXA towards the classification of fracture and non-fracture cases. Bone 2019; 121: 89-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 O’Rourke D, Beck BR, Harding AT. et al. Assessment of femoral neck strength and bone mineral density changes following exercise using 3D-DXA images. J Biomech 2021; 119: 110315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar