Download PDF
Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2008-2600
Original Article

Neuraxial Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from a Large Academic Medical Center

Olutoyosi T. Ogunkua 
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Emily H. Adhikari 
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Irina Gasanova
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Miakka N. Jalloh
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Sannoor S. Syed
1   Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Jessica E. Pruszynski 
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Catherine Y. Spong
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Three primary neuraxial techniques reduce labor pain: epidural, dural puncture epidural (DPE), and combined spinal-epidural (CSE). This study aims to determine whether neuraxial analgesia techniques changed after the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given that a dural puncture confirms neuraxial placement, we hypothesized that DPE was more frequent in women with concerns for COVID-19.

Study Design A single-center retrospective cohort study comparing neuraxial analgesia techniques for labor and delivery pain management before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and in patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) at a maternity hospital in Dallas, Texas, with a large delivery service. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square test for categorical and Kruskal–Wallis test for nonparametric ordinal comparisons. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test was used to assess the association between neuraxial technique and accidental dural puncture or postdural puncture headache.

Results Of 10,971 patients who received neuraxial analgesia for labor, 5,528 were delivered in 2019 and 5,443 in 2020. Epidural analgesia was the most common neuraxial technique for labor pain in 2019 and 2020. There was no difference in the frequency of neuraxial analgesia techniques or the rates of accidental dural puncture or postdural puncture headaches comparing all deliveries in 2019 to 2020. Despite a significant increase in DPEs relative to epidurals in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group compared with the SARS-CoV-2-negative group in 2020, there was no significant difference in postdural puncture headaches or accidental dural punctures.

Conclusion The advantages of a DPE, specifically the ability to confirm epidural placement using a small gauge spinal needle, likely led to an increase in the placement of this neuraxial in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. There was no effect on the frequency of postdural puncture headaches or accidental dural punctures within the same period.

Key Points

  • Epidural analgesia was the most common neuraxial technique for labor pain management.

  • Dural puncture epidural placements increased in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.

  • Rates of postdural puncture headaches and accidental dural puncture after neuraxial placement did not change.

Keywords

COVID-19 Pandemic - dural puncture epidural - combined spinal-epidural - epidural - postdural puncture headache - accidental dural puncture


Publication History

Received: 01 December 2022

Accepted: 05 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
05 January 2023

Article published online:
15 February 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Bauer ME, Bernstein K, Dinges E. et al. Obstetric anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anesth Analg 2020; 131 (01) 7-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bauer ME, Chiware R, Pancaro C. Neuraxial procedures in COVID-19-positive parturients: a review of current reports. Anesth Analg 2020; 131 (01) e22-e24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Khan A, Patrick A, Patil V, Nnochiri A, Wijayatilake S. The obstetric patient in the Covid pandemic: anaesthesia and perioperative care. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33 (05) 361-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bernstein K, Landau R. Management of maternal COVID-19: considerations for anesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34 (03) 246-253
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Song Y, Du W, Zhou S. et al. Effect of dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus on labor analgesia onset and maintenance: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2021; 132 (04) 971-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cook TM. Combined spinal-epidural techniques. Anaesthesia 2000; 55 (01) 42-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Toledano RD, Leffert L. What's new in neuraxial labor analgesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2021; 11 (03) 340-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. COVID in obstetrics: labor analgesia and cesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34 (01) 62-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cappiello E, O'Rourke N, Segal S, Tsen LC. A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107 (05) 1646-1651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Collis RE, Davies DW, Aveling W. Randomised comparison of combined spinal-epidural and standard epidural analgesia in labour. Lancet 1995; 345 8962 1413-1416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC. et al. Dural puncture epidural technique improves labor analgesia quality with fewer side effects compared with epidural and combined spinal epidural techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2017; 124 (02) 560-569
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bernards CM, Kopacz DJ, Michel MZ. Effect of needle puncture on morphine and lidocaine flux through the spinal meninges of the monkey in vitro. Implications for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1994; 80 (04) 853-858
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Morau E, Bouvet L, Keita H. et al; Obstetric Anaesthesia and Critical Care Club Working Group. Anaesthesia and intensive care in obstetrics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39 (03) 345-349
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bamber JH, Lucas DN. COVID-19 and access to labour epidural analgesia in UK hospitals. Anaesthesia 2020; 75 (08) 1119-1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bhatia K. Group of Obstetric Anaesthetists of Lancashire, Greater Manchester and Mersey Study Collaborators. Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in SARS-CoV-2-positive parturients across 10 maternity units in the north-west of England: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesthesia 2022; 77 (04) 389-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Patkar-Kattimani C, Athod R, Sangtani D. COVID-19 and obstetric anaesthetic services in a tertiary maternity care unit. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021; 45: 152-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gaiser RR. Postdural puncture headache: an evidence-based approach. Anesthesiol Clin 2017; 35 (01) 157-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lambert DH, Hurley RJ, Hertwig L, Datta S. Role of needle gauge and tip configuration in the production of lumbar puncture headache. Reg Anesth 1997; 22 (01) 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sprigge JS, Harper SJ. Accidental dural puncture and post dural puncture headache in obstetric anaesthesia: presentation and management: a 23-year survey in a district general hospital. Anaesthesia 2008; 63 (01) 36-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: a meta-analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50 (05) 460-469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lee JSE, Goy RWL, Sng BL, Lew E. Considerations and strategies in the organisation of obstetric anaesthesia care during the 2019 COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore. Int J Obstet Anesth 2020; 43: 114-117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar