Endoscopic removal of lumen-apposing metal stents – risk factors for stent embedment, complex removals, and adverse events: analysis from a multicenter prospective case series

Abstract

Background Removing lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) may be difficult and even harmful, but these features have seldom been analyzed. We aimed to generate a comprehensive assessment of the feasibility and safety of LAMS retrieval procedures.

Methods A prospective multicenter case series including all technically successfully deployed LAMSs between January 2019 and January 2020 that underwent endoscopic stent removal. All retrieval-related data were prospectively recorded using standardized telephone questionnaires as part of centralized follow-up that ended after stent removal had been performed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the potential risk factors for complex removal.

Results For the 407 LAMSs included, removal was attempted in 158 (38.8 %) after an indwell time of 46.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 31–70). The median (IQR) removal time was 2 (1–4) minutes. Removal was labelled as complex in 13 procedures (8.2 %), although advanced endoscopic maneuvers were required in only two (1.3 %). Complex removal risk factors were stent embedment (relative risk [RR] 5.84, 95 %CI 2.14–15.89; P = 0.001), over-the-wire deployment (RR 4.66, 95 %CI 1.60–13.56; P = 0.01), and longer indwell times (RR 1.14, 95 %CI 1.03–1.27; P = 0.01). Partial and complete embedment were observed in 14 (8.9 %) and five cases (3.2 %), respectively. The embedment rate during the first 6 weeks was 3.1 % (2/65), reaching 15.9 % (10/63) during the following 6 weeks (P = 0.02). The adverse event rate was 5.1 %, including seven gastrointestinal bleeds (5 mild, 2 moderate).

Conclusions LAMS removal is a safe procedure, mostly requiring basic endoscopic techniques attainable in conventional endoscopy rooms. Referral to advanced endoscopy units should be considered for stents with known embedment or long indwell times, which may require more technically demanding procedures.

• References

• 1 Fugazza A, Sethi A, Trindade AJ. et al. International multicenter comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with lumen-apposing metal stent placement for pancreatic fluid collection drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 574-583
• 2 Parsa N, Nieto JM, Powers P. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis using 20-mm versus 15-mm lumen-apposing metal stents: An international, multicenter, case-matched study. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 211-219
• 3 Bang JY, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Lumen-apposing metal stent placement for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: Predictors of adverse events. Gut 2020; 69: 1379-1381
• 4 Mudireddy PR, Sethi A, Siddiqui AA. et al. EUS-guided drainage of postsurgical fluid collections using lumen-apposing metal stents: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1256-1262
• 5 Tyberg A, Kedia P, Tawadros A. et al. EUS-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE): the first learning curve. J Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 54: 569-572
• 6 Stecher S, Simon P, Friesecke S. et al. Delayed severe bleeding complications after treatment of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents. Gut 2017; 66: 1871-1872
• 7 Tsuchiya T, Teoh AYB, Itoi T. et al. Long-term outcomes of EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1138-1146
• 8 Zeissig S, Sulk S, Brueckner S. et al. Severe bleeding is a rare event in patients receiving lumen-apposing metal stents for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Gut 2018; 68: 945-946
• 9 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK. et al. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 2019; 68: 1200-1209
• 10 Garcia-Alonso F, Sanchez-Ocana R, Peñas-Herrero I. et al. Cumulative risks of stent migration and gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with lumen-apposing metal stents. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 386-395
• 11 Pérez de Rozas SB, Carbajo AY, Garcia-Alonso FJ. et al. A retrospective, multicenter analysis of incidents associated with axios^TM lumen-apposing stents. Rev Esp Enfermedades Dig 2019; 111: 419-424
• 12 Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U. et al. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut 2017; 66: 2054-2056
• 13 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
• 14 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42: 377-381
• 15 Mistry T, Shah M, Javia S. et al. Retrieval and redeployment of migrated lumen-apposing metal stent to facilitate endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off necrosis. VideoGIE 2018; 3: 151-152
• 16 Krafft MR, Nasr JY. Anterograde endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct drainage: a technical review. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 1770-1781
• 17 van Halsema EE, Wong Kee Song LM, Baron TH. et al. Safety of endoscopic removal of self-expandable stents after treatment of benign esophageal diseases. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 18-28
• 18 van Heel NCM, Haringsma J, Wijnhoven BPL. et al. Endoscopic removal of self-expandable metal stents from the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 44-50
• 19 Krafft MR, Shah-Khan SM, Hsueh W. et al. Endoscopic retrieval of a buried lumen-apposing metal stent through an indwelling lumen-apposing metal stent. VideoGIE 2018; 3: 117-118
• 20 Sanchez-Ocana R, Peñas-Herrero I, Santos-Santamarta F. et al. EUS-guided removal of a buried lumen-apposing metal stent caused by delayed inward migration after cyst-gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 229
• 21 Chandran S, Efthymiou M, Kaffes A. et al. Management of pancreatic collections with a novel endoscopically placed fully covered self-expandable metal stent: a national experience (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 127-135
• 22 Venkatachalapathy S, Bekkali N, Pereira S. et al. Multicenter experience from the UK and Ireland of use of lumen-apposing metal stent for transluminal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Endosc Int Open 2018; 06: E259-E265
• 23 Biedermann J, Zeissig S, Brückner S. et al. EUS-guided stent removal in buried lumen-apposing metal stent syndrome: a case series. VideoGIE 2020; 5: 37-40
• 24 Kwon YH, Jeon SW, Lee YK. Endoscopic management of refractory benign colorectal strictures. Clin Endosc 2013; 46: 472-475
• 25 Alonso Araujo SE, Costa AF. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of benign anastomotic strictures after oncologic anterior rectal resection: report on 24 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2008; 18: 565-568
• 26 Ridtitid W, Siripun A, Rerknimitr R. Stricture at colorectal anastomosis: to dilate or to incise. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E340
• 27 Cheng YS, Li MH, Yang RJ. et al. Restenosis following balloon dilation of benign esophageal stenosis. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9: 2605-2608
• 28 Wallstabe I, Teich N. Successful endoscopic incision of pouch-anal stricture in a patient with ulcerative colitis. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19: 429-430
• 29 Kwon JH, Han KH, Kim MH. et al. Two cases of electrocautery incision therapy using an insulated-tip knife for treatment of symptomatic benign short-segment colonic stenosis following colonic resection. Korean J Gastroenterol 2014; 64: 164-167
• 30 Bravi I, Ravizza D, Fiori G. et al. Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 229-232
• 31 Karaca G, Pekcici MR, Altunkaya C. et al. The effects of scalpel, harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrocautery on the healing of colonic anastomosis after colonic resection. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016; 90: 315-321